chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
 
Chessgames.com User Profile Chessforum

jessicafischerqueen
Member since Sep-23-06
no bio
>> Click here to see jessicafischerqueen's game collections.

Chessgames.com Full Member

   jessicafischerqueen has kibitzed 46689 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Nov-01-22 jessicafischerqueen chessforum (replies)
 
jessicafischerqueen: Thanks <Fred,> and give my regards to <Mrs Bear> as well!
 
   Sep-07-22 playground player chessforum (replies)
 
jessicafischerqueen: <Ohio> lol and the inevitable "defund the police" thrown in there towards the end, almost as if it's so "de rigeur" that he almost forgot to mention it. Interestingly, the informal "street bosses" who step up to occupy the positions of defunded police street ...
 
   Sep-07-22 Susan Freeman chessforum (replies)
 
jessicafischerqueen: <z> I remember that, unless there was more than one "that" and I missed a few. I recall him flooding the forum with passages from Goethe in order to enrage <Travis Bickle> or; and/or; <Hozza>. Mephistopholes was the work in question. He posted a new ...
 
   Aug-30-22 chessgames.com chessforum (replies)
 
jessicafischerqueen: <OhioMissScarlettFan> I agree with your sentiment here: <OhioChessFan: <Missy> I appreciate your measured tone throughout this. And I agree a very high % of the time with what you're saying. Really, you're mostly saying what I am already thinking.>
 
   Aug-28-22 perfidious chessforum (replies)
 
jessicafischerqueen: Your over there regimen sounds salubrious! Interestingly, in Canada we save time by spelling "music and poker" as "moker." Initially we spelled it "poomus" but that sounded a little too declasse, even for us...
 
   Aug-24-22 Kibitzer's Café (replies)
 
jessicafischerqueen: So the Pacific Ocean can play a boat at chess! Nice one
 
   Aug-24-22 Charles Kalme (replies)
 
jessicafischerqueen: <wwall: Kalme did not win the 1954 US Junior championship. Ross Siemms won in 1954. scoring 7.5. Kalme and Saul Yarmak tied for 2nd-3rd, scoring 7.> According to Imre Konig in "CHESS LIFE (Volume 8, Number 23, August 5, 1954)" The top 4 finishers were: 1. Siemms ...
 
   Aug-22-22 Carel van den Berg (replies)
 
jessicafischerqueen: hmm... or the Furman Wikipedia photo is wrong...
 
   Aug-13-22 Biographer Bistro (replies)
 
jessicafischerqueen: Game Collection: Charousek - Maroczy Game Collection Voting
 
   Aug-10-22 WannaBe chessforum (replies)
 
jessicafischerqueen: <MannBee> sneak preview: TIE ME KANGAROO DOWN, MATE, TIE ME KANGAROO DOWN
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

Glory, Glory Tottenham Hotspur

Kibitzer's Corner
ARCHIVED POSTS
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 584 OF 801 ·  Later Kibitzing>
May-07-09  achieve: Very good find <Rfxc2>

If say Bh3 - and then:

<<Rc7> picks up Black's <a-pawn> by force.

Pretty sure about this- >

And the Doctor is not so pretty sure about this, as the <a7> square is on the <K-g1> diagonal, and very nasty threats will pop up like a <Discovered Check-attack> perhaps with ...Rd1+ (ouch) and the <c1>-rook is falling...


click for larger view

But my engine now after a long thought thinks highly of Rfxc2!

Kudos for that, <Jess>

May-07-09  hms123: <jess> After <34.Rfxc2 Bd3 35.Rc7 Bd8 36.Rxa7 Bb6>


click for larger view

May-07-09  hms123: <jess> <36.Rc8+ Bd8 37.R1c7> is better.


click for larger view

<37....a5>


click for larger view

May-07-09  achieve: <howard!> In your first FEN the Black <d3>-Bishop disables, blocks, the ...Rd1++ <discovered Double Check>

Why play the B to the <d3> square, where it Blocketh the d-rook?

HAHAHAHAAAHAHAHA

Never mind me -- who is winning in that last FEN?

Pretty tight there on the c- and d-files

May-07-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: Ah so.... I didn't see that FEN you guys found with the discovered check threat--

So in the last FEN by <hms MOOSE>, how do you judge the position?

It's certainly not a forced win from here surely... me and <Elephant> found that after the text move from the game, no defence can prevent Black from gaining a won game- especially if White tries the defence he played in the actual game (which is the puzzle solution of course).

The <MOOSE FEN> there looks hairy to me.

Imagine playing either color in time trouble.

White Queen pawns can be targeted by Black's LSB and Black's a-pawn can become a target for the White Rook on c7--

I bet a couple of GMs could play this out to a draw.

May-07-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: <who is winning in that last FEN?>

JINX

nervy position

May-07-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: In <Howard's> first FEN the discovered check still wins material-

<Rc4+> still picks up the White Rook in exchange for a bishop-

Then Black has a clear piece up and a won game-

But the Bishop retreat to <h3> looks "clean"-

But later Black might want that Bishop nearer White's queen pawns, which are both on light squares?

May-07-09  achieve: Nervy indeed. I think the ...Bd3 is not good enough, as I said it blocks and interferes with the movement of the Black d4 rook (to d1).

...Bh3 may be better

Same patterns emerge but with better chances for equality for Black...

Things might go to something like this:


click for larger view

W to play

heh, +0.05 (Rybka)

May-07-09  hms123: <jess> <niels. In the last FEN, Black has a slight advantage, but is far from winning.
May-07-09  achieve: <But the Bishop retreat to <h3> looks "clean"-

But later Black might want that Bishop nearer White's queen pawns, which are both on light squares?> Good point, and certainly one to consider... Very complex position this.

My gut tells me Black can hold...

May-07-09  hms123: <34...Bh3 35.Rc8+ Bd8 36.Ra8 Kf8 37.Rcc8 Ke8>


click for larger view

<38.Rxa7 Rd7 39. Rxd7 Kxd7 40.Rb8>


click for larger view

Even.

May-07-09  achieve: Ermm... White can hold?

Back to ze drawing board...

May-07-09  achieve: <howard> Your second FEN is exactly the same as mine: +0.05

So Fritz and Ryb "agree"

Well, what does that teach me...

The final FEN is still a bit "nervy" for us humans.

I think <Jess> early conclusions were right on the money, and deserve another round of applause, irrespective of all the fancy Pin discovery Channel lines.

May-07-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: If <Rybka> is drawing itself- then we might say that two GMs might find a draw as well? I think there's plenty of room for someone to make a mistake though.

I'd bet a lot of money there would be a decisive result in this line between <sub-2000> rated players.

May-07-09  hms123: <niels> <jess> I agree with Jess. There would be a decisive result most of the time--I would say even for <sub-2200>players. That's a tough, unbalanced position.

Good find, Jess. And, here at least, a nice morning's workout.

May-07-09  achieve: <jessicafischerqueen: If <Rybka> is drawing itself- then we might say that two GMs might find a draw as well? I think there's plenty of room for someone to make a mistake though.> I think so - not at all sure here two GM's would draw this...

Nigel Short said a few months ago he had to play the last round Corus while ending up so tired in that final game that he <couldn't count the number of pieces on the board> anymore.

He wasn't kidding.

I wouldn't connect the outcome to the two ratings of the players.

Exhibit A: The game of today's puzzle, where you found Rfxc2, and the GM played an instantly losing move.

May-07-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: Heh....

Thank goodness for those <instantly losing moves>.

If they didn't exist, I couldn't win any games.

May-07-09  hms123: <niels> Good point, indeed. The issue, though, is that finding one's way through this kind of position is difficult for everyone, but that weaker players are more likely to make a third-best or fourth-best choice, rather than merely a second-best choice.

Of course, as you say, fatigue and other factors would certainly enter into the equation in a particular instance.

May-07-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: <other factors>

Once I was calculating a long sequence on my porch and my Mom made me help her bring in the groceries.

When I got back to the board, I played an <instantly losing move>.

However, I *did* enjoy some tasty perogies later with my Mom.

May-07-09  hms123: <I *did* enjoy some tasty perogies later with my Mom.>

Lucky you. Are then any left? I guess not--just as well, I suppose.

Crumbs.

May-07-09  achieve: <weaker players are more likely to make a third-best or fourth-best choice> No doubt. But...

Players

- do have their "specialties"

- can get inspired, rejuvenated

- can get overcome by nerves

- can overcome the nerves

- etc

<Howard> Having replayed a lot of the Olympiad games where 300+ rating difference was involved, quite remarkable was the number of times the lower rated "weaker" guy was outplaying the stronger one out of the opening, well into the middle game, but around move 35 started throwing away the win, during crunch-time...

But statistically you will be proven right, I suppose, even though the stat may have little baring in case of an individual game/ particular position.

May-07-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: yes- given position, given day- anybody can lose the thread of a position, especially this kind.

Also, sometimes <minus 300 points> people "take scalps" precisely because the <Master player> is emotionally "resting."

You can't really "rest" when you're playing serious chess.

The endurance test is mental, not "glutear"-- It's not the sitting on your butt for 3 to 7 hours-- it's the keeping the thread of the game for that long.

Sometimes the worm turns...

May-07-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: <H>

<crumbs>

heh-- you realize that perogies can't have crumbs eh?

THEY'RE SOFT!!

Do they have "ethnic food" in your state?

They have "ethnic food" here, but it's all <Korean ethnic food>.

Mrs. Ethnographer
Peeling Potatos division

May-07-09  hms123: <niels> <jess> The problem with statistics is that they don't have any bearing on an individual case. As Damon Runyan once said:

<The race is not always to the swift, not the battle to the strong, but that's the way to bet.>

May-07-09  madlydeeply: ok no more foreigner that is so immature sorry. Whew what a relief it is to let go ofSEEMS LIKE THE FIRST TIME I WOULD CLIMB ANY MOUNTAIN SAIL ACCROSS A STORMY SEA YAH YAH

um so how do you make those groovy position graphics, with the li'l chess pardner?

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 801)
search thread:   
ARCHIVED POSTS
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 584 OF 801 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific user only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Participating Grandmasters are Not Allowed Here!

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
   
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC