chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
 
Chessgames.com User Profile Chessforum

jessicafischerqueen
Member since Sep-23-06
no bio
>> Click here to see jessicafischerqueen's game collections.

Chessgames.com Full Member

   jessicafischerqueen has kibitzed 46689 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Nov-01-22 jessicafischerqueen chessforum (replies)
 
jessicafischerqueen: Thanks <Fred,> and give my regards to <Mrs Bear> as well!
 
   Sep-07-22 playground player chessforum (replies)
 
jessicafischerqueen: <Ohio> lol and the inevitable "defund the police" thrown in there towards the end, almost as if it's so "de rigeur" that he almost forgot to mention it. Interestingly, the informal "street bosses" who step up to occupy the positions of defunded police street ...
 
   Sep-07-22 Susan Freeman chessforum (replies)
 
jessicafischerqueen: <z> I remember that, unless there was more than one "that" and I missed a few. I recall him flooding the forum with passages from Goethe in order to enrage <Travis Bickle> or; and/or; <Hozza>. Mephistopholes was the work in question. He posted a new ...
 
   Aug-30-22 chessgames.com chessforum (replies)
 
jessicafischerqueen: <OhioMissScarlettFan> I agree with your sentiment here: <OhioChessFan: <Missy> I appreciate your measured tone throughout this. And I agree a very high % of the time with what you're saying. Really, you're mostly saying what I am already thinking.>
 
   Aug-28-22 perfidious chessforum (replies)
 
jessicafischerqueen: Your over there regimen sounds salubrious! Interestingly, in Canada we save time by spelling "music and poker" as "moker." Initially we spelled it "poomus" but that sounded a little too declasse, even for us...
 
   Aug-24-22 Kibitzer's Café (replies)
 
jessicafischerqueen: So the Pacific Ocean can play a boat at chess! Nice one
 
   Aug-24-22 Charles Kalme (replies)
 
jessicafischerqueen: <wwall: Kalme did not win the 1954 US Junior championship. Ross Siemms won in 1954. scoring 7.5. Kalme and Saul Yarmak tied for 2nd-3rd, scoring 7.> According to Imre Konig in "CHESS LIFE (Volume 8, Number 23, August 5, 1954)" The top 4 finishers were: 1. Siemms ...
 
   Aug-22-22 Carel van den Berg (replies)
 
jessicafischerqueen: hmm... or the Furman Wikipedia photo is wrong...
 
   Aug-13-22 Biographer Bistro (replies)
 
jessicafischerqueen: Game Collection: Charousek - Maroczy Game Collection Voting
 
   Aug-10-22 WannaBe chessforum (replies)
 
jessicafischerqueen: <MannBee> sneak preview: TIE ME KANGAROO DOWN, MATE, TIE ME KANGAROO DOWN
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

Glory, Glory Tottenham Hotspur

Kibitzer's Corner
ARCHIVED POSTS
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 605 OF 801 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jul-05-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: Oh yes and the "beyond comfort level" - you'll recall that matches exactly with my comparison of cotton candy to a nutritious meal I gave in my EMU.

It's only fun for me if it's tough to figure out.

Jul-06-09  achieve: <Jess>: <Makes me feel good about having driven myself insane> Brilliant... Got to remember that one.

<It's only fun for me if it's tough to figure out.> heh - again...

<Oh yes and the "beyond comfort level" - you'll recall that matches exactly ...> Exactly.

Pain and gain are OK, but when study becomes "draining" ... That's a no-no, as the gentlemen you refer to said. And that too is personal.

Hmmm - this was too easy! Yeah - I like a good scrap and a few scars as well; I liked it when I got something to show for my 'delicious pain', and sometimes went off the court bleeding, not just figuratively speaking.

We all roll certain ways, and some change over time, as well, I presume.

Jul-06-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: <El Coacho>

Yes- I think that there are certain people who can only ever have fun at a pastime- whatever it is- if they are forced to go beyond comfort level.

My Mom's favorite is the Friday New York Times crossword-

It can drive her crazy, but each New York Times Daily puzzle- (each is a little harder than the previous day) both prepares and builds her up for it.

I imagine our crew of <CG.com> Puzzle of the Day regulars have a very similar experience- judging from their kibbutzes, since the puzzles are arranged in same pattern as the NYT Crosswords.

My would have as much interest in solving the TV Guide crossword (easiest on the planet) as she would in staring at a rock for six hours.

Actually that kind of sounds like fun. Maybe a bad analogy.

But you get my drift.

That's why a reliable ratings range is imporant for me in selecting a game- I can't play that often due to time constraints.

Has to be someone within a 50-100 points strength of me, preferably stronger.

Otherwise there's virtually no chance of the "mental stretch" that makes me feel best while playing chess, and after the game as well.

And I don't want to play someone right out of my league- getting pounded, or worse- "handled" in a way that makes you think you never had a chance even to draw is a bit too extreme for me. I like to play someone better, but against whom I have a chance to win.

This need for reliable "rating number to playing strength correspondence" is the main reason I put FICS on hold.

Absolutely ridiculous to have 1700+ members playing like fish at 90 minutes each, and then to get pounded by someone sandbagging in the 1400 range who is actually significantly stronger than me.

At long time controls <Yahoo> is 100 times more reliable in terms of the number actually matching playing strength.

And they seem to have solved the bug that made the tables crash- which is what drove me to FICS in the first place.

Tally Ho!!

Jul-06-09  Open Defence: Happy <NAVEL PROBE> Week!!!
Jul-06-09  achieve: heh - GO GET 'em, Tigresse!!

Here's a true story from own experience, that I had almost forgotten, but suddenly remembered following your excellent post, in picking opposition that force you to "stretch"

I remember in my preparation for Seoul, as I had no real competition in Holland, who were essentially my team-mates, and I was national champ, that "we" were able to arrange a sparring-partner for me that could push me to <go and search for> that illusive edge, extra speed, that I needed to be able to compete with, and beat, the absolute top level from players from France, Sweden, Finland, Germany, Asia... So I spent two weeks at an aunt's house who lived near a guy who was absolute able bodied top in Holland, premier league player here, and I got whupped pretty bad at first, all games 21-15, or worse for me, but I was forced to adapt, and simply find a way to compete with him, as I could feel and sense he wasn't more talented or creative with the ball, but he just had at least 10-20% added leg speed, movement, and therefore incredibly grooved topspins, fast ones, off both wings... So I started to speed up myself, I needed to, lower my position, knee bend, and didn't care if I lost 10 out of 10 games we played a day, in the first week, but at the end of week two, I cut in to the ratio and got it down to probably 3:1 - 2:1, still in his favor, making him the favorite, still, in any best of five if we'd play. But at least I felt I had gained ground, sharpened up many aspects of my game that hadn't improved that much in years, and really that two week training camp had gotten me in the right frame of mind to play extremely sharp, within my control, in Seoul, with "surprisingly" good result.

Most important was the air of confidence that i had gained, and was able to take with me to Korea. It was only a matter of being able to control the mind and nerves, in order to be able to dig up what I "knew" was in there...

The fact that I "knew" it was there, firmly believed in it, is what gave me the edge. That confidence can even make you beat a "higher rated" - if the guy gets rattled, if you start shakin his "bonbons", those guys could tense up and were really rolling over like puppies, because they'd lose confidence in the abilities they had.

Sounds tough, but if you smell blood, and go after it like a rabbit badger, the so called top dogs can go off the boil.

That's why sparring against an engine is valuable, but never will they go off the boil. Never.

Humans do, without exception IMO.

Conclusion:

As long as you pick players that are intrinsically stronger than you (which is hard to do online as you explained - I hope Yahoo *does* provide that pool of players for you), learn to spar with them, live with them, even if you lose every game, you'll be closing in on them, without even being aware.

I was lucky though, that we were able to find a guy of relative 2600 strength, where I was say 2400/2450, and spend TWO WEEKS functioning as a sparring robot, which is much harder in chess, to find someone, or the plural, to be there - daily - for 3 to 4 hours a day for sparring.

Point is that you want the serious sparring at 30 mins a game minimum, and not the 10 mins or faster format.

Anyhoo, 't can be fun reminiscing, and it illustrates the importance- and luxury- of being able to play and train against stronger opposition, dragging you out of your comfort zone, forcing you to <find ways> to close the gap, if possible, or at least learn to live with the temporary, "uncomfortable", situation.

Not many have the balls to undergo that, and it becomes harder and harder with advancing years, but eg Jacob Aagaard, prolific chess writer, managed to get his GM title well in his thirties.

Actually - to have the silly engines as super slaves, is quite an advantage in many ways, to other sports, and to make good use of them is quite a challenge, but they are at your beg and call 24/7 - though not a lot of fun to talk to.

Well - that's what our CHESS AHOY friends are for.

Jul-06-09  achieve: <Jess> Just send you a cut short emu that I promised to send, but had to cut off just when I started because I myself had an appointment with someone, that I completely forgot about... Doh...

Mr. Needs a Secretary
(Where's Lars when you need him!)

Jul-06-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: A very thrilling, and instructive sports story, <Doctor>.

You already mastered one art.

I don't think it's necessary or even advisable for everyone to try to master an art.

But I think the attempt carries a certain charismatic drama for the fan.

I will try to master the art of teaching English without throwing students out of third story windows, for a start.

I won't be able to master chess in any form- but I certainly look forward to future battles.

Only 4 weeks now till vacation!

Jul-06-09  achieve: <I don't think it's necessary or even advisable for everyone to try to master an art.> I couldn't agree more, and it's all relative as to setting goals; what I mean is that I never had to reach too far ahead of my possibilities, to gain significant progress, fairly soon, which is mostly luck, for genetic reasons.Within 2 years of joining a club, I was selected for European Champ chips in Ingolstadt, Germany, so it went quickly. But I was a very eager student and LOVED to train. Very hard. Loved it.

No way I am gonna stare myself to death at some sort of goal with which I have little feeling with, most unlikely to be within my grasp.

But that I covered in another 500 word post at someone else's page...

I posted at Barangay!! And was treated to a <red carpet> welcome!

Like Old Times!!@!@!

Jul-06-09  Trigonometrist: Hey <Jess>..about torrenting I stumbled on to this link...

It discusses port forwarding and a particular patch that helps speeds...

http://filesharefreak.com/2008/04/0...

It's for uTorrent alone, I think, but the patch must work for any interface...Try it if you haven't...

Anyway though I managed to forward a port my speeds are stuck on an average of 25 kb/s. Earlier it used to fluctuate from 5 to 35 kb/s...

But I can't attain higher speeds...

Hmmm...so I'll have to spend another two days to download Death Note(7.28 GB)...

Jul-06-09  hms123: <jess> Here's a position (after 52 moves) from the Carlsen vs Naiditsch, 2009 game. White to move and win. This is not an issue of tactics, but one of strategy instead. Try to win it against Shredder and then check out how Carlsen managed.


click for larger view

Jul-06-09  Ragh: <jessicafischerqueen: This need for reliable "rating number to playing strength correspondence" is the main reason I put FICS on hold.> FICS also conducts tournaments in 60min/15sec and 75/0 time controls every weekend. These tournaments will definitely attract players who are serious at playing those TCs. You should probably try those instead of just posting a 90/0 seek and waiting for an opponent.
Jul-07-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  ChessBookForum: Open me at your peril.

Tremble at my works.

Oh...and fear me.

Jul-07-09  achieve: <Jess> Reply emu in your nest.

Bit more logistical this time around...

Will get to the details of your last one a bit later; pressed for time here now a bit.

Jul-07-09  benjinathan: <jfq> Thanks for responding to my rant in such an honest and forthright way. My view is that there is lots of place for chess enthusiasts of all kinds here and I won't slag any of them including the ones I find odious (like on the Fischer and Carlsen pages). Although I would say that I want this to be a place where I am relatively comfortable having my kids visit and I do defend that somewhat.

But the pettey sniping drives me insane. I have quit the Umansky game. My memebrship renewal is in 19 days and if I had not just started a game with <justakid> I probably would disappear altogether.

Good luck on your improvement. I would love to know how you do it. Ihave put two hard years in and recently I have felt like I have been going backwards.

Peace.

Jul-07-09  Travis Bickle: Ello Jess come to my forum for a musical trip back to the 60's. ; P
Jul-07-09  chessic eric: <jessicafischerqueen: User: 600POUNDGORILLA

heh> Too funny!

Jul-07-09  just a kid: <benjinathan>I hate that too.That's what you have an ignore list for. ;)
Jul-07-09  Boomie: <Jessie: <benjinathan: Good luck on your improvement. I would love to know how you do it. I have put two hard years in and recently I have felt like I have been going backwards.> <Boomie at Benji's house>: First, Jessie will respond with her version of how she's "doing it". She's a teacher and never misses an opportunity to lecture us.>

Perhaps I shouldn't have said this without your consent. But it sounded "right" at the time. See Benji's forum for my complete post on training.

I was inspired by Howard the Duck's little message about CG'ers who like to help. So I blame Quack. And society.

Jul-07-09  just a kid: Arggggggghhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!

I was in the midist of making a new collection which had a lot a typing and all of the sudden my computer froze!I'm too lazy to type it all again.I was making a collection on the interesting opening 1.e4 e5 2.f4 Bc5 3.Qh5!?

Jul-07-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: <Trig> I urge you to do more research before dowloading programs.

If you do download programs that promise to help your torrent download speed, be very careful.

1. I recommend seeing if the software is available on the CNET website. If it isn't, it could be useless- or worse- it could be spyware or other malware. Like pornography, "fast download speed" is something with a big demand, so there are lots of crooks out there looking to exploit it.

If the software download is available on CNET, carefully read the editor's review and ALL of the user reviews.

2. The longer I read about this topic and experiment, the more I believe that the most salient issue is the quality of the torrent.

Make sure the torrent isn't malware- read up on how to recognize a "fake torrent"-

And then make sure that there are more "seeders" than "leechers" before you download a given torrent.

The overall number of people involved in sharing a file is not the most important factor- the seed-to-leach ratio is.

IE- a torrent file with 1,333 seeders and 5,000 leachers has a lot of traffic-

But a torrent file with 45 seeders and 5 leachers is MUCH BETTER for download speed.

Good luck with your patches, add ons and software downloads- but please be careful.

Research any software thoroughly before downloading.

And like I said, IMO CNET is the best guarantee of <bona fide> software downloads.

Jul-07-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: Hi <Tyler>!!

Sorry to hear about your disaster- It's happened to me too more than a few times.

Sounds like a good idea for a games collection.

Jul-07-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: <Howard> thank you for the training exercise- I will in fact try it out, just don't have the time for any chess study or play at the moment.

End of semester shenanigans at work and holiday planning are driving me insane right now.

Jul-07-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: <Raghamuffin>

Thanks for the FICS tip!

I'm sure you are correct, as usual. I may give them another chance if THEY are lucky--

However, I've had nothing but good experience on <Yahoo> with long time controls since I switched back.

No long waits for a game, reliable ratings-to-strength numbers, no lag, and most importantly- no disconnections or crashing tables.

Jul-07-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: <Travis> I listened to several of the new King tracks you posted- sorry I haven't kept up but I've been really busy lately.

Will do a more thorough check of your new playlists as soon as I can.

Jul-07-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: <Cartoon of a Book>

You're not fooling anyone, you know.

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 801)
search thread:   
ARCHIVED POSTS
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 605 OF 801 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific user only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Participating Grandmasters are Not Allowed Here!

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
   
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC