ARCHIVED POSTS
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 607 OF 801 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
| Jul-09-09 | | zanshin: <b> Don't delete it. I just read it - and it's an excellent, well-written post. I will read it again later when I have more time. |
|
| Jul-09-09 | | Boomie: <zanshin: I don't know the exact reasons <Domdaniel, Twinlark, Deffi, hms123, Boomie> have stopped (or greatly reduced) their participation the GMMU game.> I'm not sure I know exactly why either. The main aggravation I had was the demise of the forum system. That system seemed to be working so why scrap it? The main reason for the end of the forums seemed to be that kwid and his friends refused to use it. <zanshin> remember when we and some others scanned the main page to copy lines to the appropriate forae? We could never get those players to stop cluttering the main page with their huge lines. One must ask why did they insist on using the main page. Was it the allure of a larger audience? Another problem I had was the influx of stronger CC players. This seemed to me to be in violation of the spirit of the game. This was supposed to be a team of amateurs which I interpret as players below 2400 in strength. Perhaps this definition is wrong but I would like the word "amateur" defined in this context. In the forums I felt the camaraderie you mention. Discussion could be easily followed. On the main page one has to go back many pages to find the start of a discussion and it's hard to follow. Perhaps this is one reason only computer lines are posted. Why bother leaving a comment when it's going to be almost impossible to find the responses? Without the forums I feel I have nothing to contribute. At least as a forum sponsor I could participate in the logistics of the team. My main contribution to the GMMU game has been my comment which started this whole discussion. I now have mixed emotions about that since it has led to some hard feelings. But it did cause some people to examine what they are doing and why so I suppose the overall effect is positive. |
|
| Jul-09-09 | | zanshin: <<zanshin> remember when we and some others scanned the main page to copy lines to the appropriate forae?> Yes, <Boomie>, I remember that. I complained it was a tedious and thankless job - so you thanked me for doing it! The camaraderie factor that <benjinathan> mentioned, I had also included in my initial reply to <JFQ> on the benefits of Centaur chess (which was lost when my laptop blue screened). I wrote something like: "I enjoy the interaction with diverse and intelligent people (who else plays chess? ;-)) from all parts of the world." With the "Real World Team" and everything that has happened since GMAN1, I don't know if we can ever get back to being a bunch of amateurs just having fun. |
|
| Jul-09-09 | | hms123: <Boomie> <zanshin> <benjinathan> I think <Boomie> has captured it well. I made lots of friends in the World games--you three among them. I don't think that would/could happen in the current version. It is hard to contribute and <kwid> and his buddies make it harder to do so. They undermined the forum system--intentionally if <kingscrusher> and others are right. It is easy to believe. I think the cg folks need to find other formats to replace the World games so as to preserve the site's attractiveness to a wider variety of chess players. I think the good guys are being pushed out by the a-social nature of the World game. It is not going to get better. |
|
| Jul-09-09 | | benjinathan: I have to say I agree with almost everything that is written below my post. I don't accept <kingcrushers> allegations, however. They make no sense. Having said that I accept that <kwid>'s particpiation ands the way they particpate makes it virtually impossible for the below 1800 player to do anything. Perversely, that is why I have defended the game so strongly: it is because there are a few-Tabanus and Imag and (even)_Artar that work like crazy to contirbute and I didn't like the belittling of that effort. |
|
Jul-09-09
 | | jessicafischerqueen: Well thanks for all of these posts-
It appears there is much consensus here.
<Ben>- actually, the <Kingscrusher-Kwid> feud has a long, long pedigree- One of us actually knows something accurate about this feud. <Tim>? Was it you? Or <Howard>? |
|
| Jul-09-09 | | hms123: <jess> Not me--but I have my own experience with <kwid> around the forums. I won't say more in public, but it gives me reason to believe <kingscrusher>. Let me add that I have had exactly no contact of any kind ever with <kingscrusher> other than to watch some of his videos. |
|
Jul-09-09
 | | jessicafischerqueen: Were you ever tempted to tell him to <kwid it>? |
|
| Jul-09-09 | | hms123: <jess> Actually, yes. He doesn't seem to listen well. |
|
| Jul-09-09 | | benjinathan: The problem with the <kwid> conspiracy theories is that, so far as I can tell, there are about four people who read his standard engine post. So even if they are deliberately false, they only mislead four people. Really, so much of this could be avoided through deliberate use of the ignore button...a fate sure to befall me, I am sure...anyone?; anyone? Buehler? |
|
| Jul-09-09 | | Boomie: <Jessie: re Kingcrusher. <Tim>? Was it you?> Guilty a bit. Kingcrusher posted a link to his site where kb2ct (under a different handle) had insulted a GM opponent. I think most of Kingcrusher's complaints concern this kind of interaction with the kwidz kidz on his site. Perhaps he should have posted on their forae instead of the game page. However his statements about long lines was in tune with the discussion that I (somewhat regrettably now) started. So I mostly agree with Benji that Kingcrusher shouldn't have posted this on the game page except for the statements about long lines. |
|
| Jul-09-09 | | Boomie: <jessicafischerqueen:
Contrary to popular opinion, the <swastika> symbol was not lifted intact by the Nazis. They changed the Indian swastika symbol- which is Buddhist, by the way- by reversing the direction of the little thingies on the end of the spokes.> Well, not exactly true. Swastikas have been found that date back to 5000 BC. It is a design that occurs naturally in square basket weaving. A little closer to India, swastikas have been found in the remains of the Indus Valley civilization which was ground into dust by the invasion of the Vedic culture. So the symbol was used on the subcontinent before 1500 BC when the invasion took place. The symbol was used in both right and left handed forms. In Hinduism they represent Brahma the creator. The right handed form is the evolution and the left handed form is the involution of the universe. |
|
Jul-09-09
 | | jessicafischerqueen: Well spotted <Tim>!! Which is more than I can say for this defective Dalmatian I once bought. This is what I get for not GOOGLING for fact checking. However, I'd much rather learn from you than from "it". |
|
| Jul-09-09 | | twinlark: Boomie's comments on ceasing participation in the World teams is pretty much spot on. I spent hours in the GMT game copying analyses into forums, exhorting people (especially the strong CC players) to take a few seconds to post their analyses into the forums and participate in the discussions, hosing down fights, extricating myself from fights, and generally trying to support kutztown46 and zanshin in keeping the forum system alive. Not to mention engaging in analysis myself. The factors that produced those early victories: the forum system, the camaraderie, the willingness to think outside the box, to use engines as a tool rather than a crutch (or substitute brain), the lively debates, and most of all the sense of a coherent Team, seem to have disappeared. I haven't been remotely tempted to join, or even to eavesdrop. I couldn't bear it. |
|
| Jul-09-09 | | Boomie: <JessieRoo>
"On August 25 through August 31, 2008, Daegu hosted the first ever Asian Bodypainting Festival" Will you be attending this year? I hear your interpretation of Alexander Alekhine last year was a real crowd pleaser. |
|
| Jul-09-09 | | Boomie: <jessicafischerqueen: If you are on Windows- just delete all files from your cache and reboot.> I tried this with IE8 but it didn't work. I'm stuck with goofy icons. Still it's a good idea to clean house every now and again. If you know where the right icon is for a program, you can change it by right clicking the link and selecting properties. I don't know any wholesale way of changing them all though. Sigh. Bloody computers. |
|
| Jul-09-09 | | zanshin: <The factors that produced those early victories: the forum system, the camaraderie, the willingness to think outside the box, to use engines as a tool rather than a crutch (or substitute brain), the lively debates, and most of all the sense of a coherent Team, seem to have disappeared.> Good summary <twinlark>! Your non-participation was and still is the Team's loss. |
|
Jul-09-09
 | | jessicafischerqueen: <Tim> IE8 is one of the worst browsers in the entire history of the Internet. Re-install IE7 is my advice.
<Gorilla Firefox 3.5> is quite marvellous IMO. |
|
| Jul-10-09 | | Boomie: <JessAroooo>
I see the great Drawski debate rages on. There have been only 5 decisive games out of 21 at Dortmund. If I am Krammy, I'm not going to press against a player like Leko. In the last round, Bacrot vs Kramnik, 2009, he tried a little harder with black against Backrow. Interesting game with lots of wierd tactics. |
|
Jul-10-09
 | | jessicafischerqueen: Somebody has to fill in for <Woody>. Also, it's always fun when I can show up on <acirce's> radar since he has me on perma-ignore. I have to say his post today showed remarkable restraint, compared to some of the medecine he's adminstered to <Vladimir "Anand's not *really* the world champion yet" Kramnik> bashers. I don't care for him at all- but I have to say I respect him more than some people I could mention. When he puts someone on ignore he doesn't take them off to "peek". He only goes by "reposted comments." I admire such conviction.
Also, he was cracking jokes when 99.99999 percent of the time he's a dour, jaundiced, supercilious, and frequently malevolent sourpuss. As well, the whole thread should be deleted off there anyways since it belongs on the <Vladimir "I'm a Gutless Wonder who should have retired after being Humiliated by Anand" Kramnik> player page. |
|
| Jul-10-09 | | Boomie: Gott in Himmel! Thorsson has returned and as incisive as always. I knew there was a reason for scanning the game page. <Thorsson: I was shocked to see that the forum system had disappeared. It was one of the team's great strengths, even if it wasn't always smooth sailing.
I'd be a little worried, from the admittedly little I've read, that the team had largely descended into being a postman for RV's Rybka 3.> <Thorsson:
<<mcguigan97: Hmm...you do know a draw is when both sides are equal?
GMMU, who you praise for his non-Rybka moves, only got a draw.The team - with Rybka support - got a draw.
Therefore, GMMU did not play better than our team. His "non-Rybka" moves did not help him. And please note, he had white. As you know, if anything, a draw with white is a worse performance than a draw with black. The game provides no support for the notion that we played badly or that GMMU played well. We are equal - that is what a draw is.> > "All Animals are Equal. But some are more equal than others." The erudite and intelligent will understand what I mean by this, but education being what it is these days, let me elucidate. Umansky, possibly assisted by a computer, but if so certainly a less powerful one than RV's, has held a team of many hundreds, assisted by many computers, including RV's beast, to a draw. That's a moral victory to Umansky for my money. He is more equal than the team. Having been on both sides of the fence (I once played a game against a team on another site) I don't think it's really possible to beat an organised, large team supported by numerous strong computers. At least the odds of every single Centaur missing the problem move are probably dependent on reaching a very singular position.> |
|
Jul-10-09
 | | jessicafischerqueen: Well <Thorsson> has just said everything I said- even more categorically, in fact. But without insulting anyone.
What a most excellent role model he is. |
|
| Jul-10-09 | | Boomie: <JessieKim>
I chatted with your twin sister today. She mentioned how hard it is to find an English teacher in Korea. Being a mensch, and not that bright a one at that, I blurted out that I knew this dingbat in Daegu who would love to chat about anything. I gave her the link to your forum. So if you get a strange message in broken English from a guest, you know who to blame. Prolly not going to happen but I kinda hope it does although I'm not sure why. She plays a different game but would be rated somewhere around 2650 if they used ELO. Plus she's totally charming. Oh, her name is Cho Hye Yeon. So...there it is then. |
|
| Jul-10-09 | | Boomie: <jessicafischerqueen: <Tim> IE8 is one of the worst browsers in the entire history of the Internet.> I went into the Temp folder and deleted the goofy icons by hand, rebooted, and viola da gamba, game over. Figures the go ddamned fu cking bastard of a browser tool didn't touch them. Gen. Boomie S. Patton |
|
Jul-10-09
 | | jessicafischerqueen: <temporary layoffs
GOOD TIMES!>
Since the first moment I went on line I've become convinced that everyone, including people who make the "free browsers", wants to make it as difficult as possible to delete the "temporary cache". It can become bloated quickly and slow down your speed. But more sinister- nobody wants you to have the ability to block third party cookies. Ok cookies are plenty useful- but I could live without them. I know all my passwords etc. and it takes a minute at most to re-sign in to all the sites I use that have passwords. These "cookies" can be "gateway foods" to more sinister fare- Like Trojans, Ghost Trackers, and all manner of unwanted attention gusting up to having your PC hijacked. It is estimated that as many as 30 per cent of all personal computers are currently in some form of "drone state". You might never know, until you are investigated by the police. (More horrifying, I suspect that some of the "members" at this website have been hijacked. Not their computers- but them themselves. This is the prescient thesis of <Marcuse's> "One Dimensional Man," following <Weber>, who pioneered the notion of human beings turning in to what he termed "monads") |
|
 |
 |
ARCHIVED POSTS
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 607 OF 801 ·
Later Kibitzing> |