chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
 
Chessgames.com User Profile Chessforum

jessicafischerqueen
Member since Sep-23-06
no bio
>> Click here to see jessicafischerqueen's game collections.

Chessgames.com Full Member

   jessicafischerqueen has kibitzed 46689 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Nov-01-22 jessicafischerqueen chessforum (replies)
 
jessicafischerqueen: Thanks <Fred,> and give my regards to <Mrs Bear> as well!
 
   Sep-07-22 playground player chessforum (replies)
 
jessicafischerqueen: <Ohio> lol and the inevitable "defund the police" thrown in there towards the end, almost as if it's so "de rigeur" that he almost forgot to mention it. Interestingly, the informal "street bosses" who step up to occupy the positions of defunded police street ...
 
   Sep-07-22 Susan Freeman chessforum (replies)
 
jessicafischerqueen: <z> I remember that, unless there was more than one "that" and I missed a few. I recall him flooding the forum with passages from Goethe in order to enrage <Travis Bickle> or; and/or; <Hozza>. Mephistopholes was the work in question. He posted a new ...
 
   Aug-30-22 chessgames.com chessforum (replies)
 
jessicafischerqueen: <OhioMissScarlettFan> I agree with your sentiment here: <OhioChessFan: <Missy> I appreciate your measured tone throughout this. And I agree a very high % of the time with what you're saying. Really, you're mostly saying what I am already thinking.>
 
   Aug-28-22 perfidious chessforum (replies)
 
jessicafischerqueen: Your over there regimen sounds salubrious! Interestingly, in Canada we save time by spelling "music and poker" as "moker." Initially we spelled it "poomus" but that sounded a little too declasse, even for us...
 
   Aug-24-22 Kibitzer's Café (replies)
 
jessicafischerqueen: So the Pacific Ocean can play a boat at chess! Nice one
 
   Aug-24-22 Charles Kalme (replies)
 
jessicafischerqueen: <wwall: Kalme did not win the 1954 US Junior championship. Ross Siemms won in 1954. scoring 7.5. Kalme and Saul Yarmak tied for 2nd-3rd, scoring 7.> According to Imre Konig in "CHESS LIFE (Volume 8, Number 23, August 5, 1954)" The top 4 finishers were: 1. Siemms ...
 
   Aug-22-22 Carel van den Berg (replies)
 
jessicafischerqueen: hmm... or the Furman Wikipedia photo is wrong...
 
   Aug-13-22 Biographer Bistro (replies)
 
jessicafischerqueen: Game Collection: Charousek - Maroczy Game Collection Voting
 
   Aug-10-22 WannaBe chessforum (replies)
 
jessicafischerqueen: <MannBee> sneak preview: TIE ME KANGAROO DOWN, MATE, TIE ME KANGAROO DOWN
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

Glory, Glory Tottenham Hotspur

Kibitzer's Corner
ARCHIVED POSTS
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 633 OF 801 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Sep-23-09  A Karpov Fan: I don't ever find the time to wallow in the deep waters of chess study <Jess>. I'm much closer to the gnat.

Behold my gnat like appetites...

I worked on this puzzle yesterday, it took me quite some time but the answer is so simple once you see it. I felt I learned a broader strategic concept from it also, so like to share it with you.


click for larger view

White to move and mate in two.

(I apologize if this is too simple for you btw, I am just a humble gnat tho)

P.S.

I am limbering up for my revenge in a few hours!

-lol-

Sep-23-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: <Anatoli>

That's not such an easy puzzle, due to the fact that a forced mate is not hard to find- but the eye wants the fingers to move a rook to the e7 square to deliver check. That leads to a forced mate from either Rook in all variations, and it's absolutely what I would play in an actual game.

This mates, of course, but White must still play Ne6 after the Black King moves.

It's faster to mate by not delivering check on the first move.

The "in between move" Ne6 played first mates one move faster than if you deliver check on the first move. The fact that you need the Knight to be on the <e6> square in any case means that the all too tempting Rook check on <e7> is actually a wasted move.

This means you have to also recognize that White has time for an in between move- a <ziefadhgushungt swiffer mop> is the correct term-- because Black has no defence. White has time here.

I'm guessing that's the "trick" to the puzzle eh?

You know this website is full of puzzle solvers who will line up to tell you how easy this puzzle is.

But you know what, puzzles are not games and they are not as important as games. I bet you almost every one of those people would actually deliver the Rook check first in an actual game.

I can also tell you that there are many, many puzzle solvers here who don't even play games.

Solving a puzzle is fun- and puzzle solving is still regarded as the best method of tactical training- apart from actually playing.

But your ass is not on the line in a puzzle.

It takes guts to play a game- it doesn't take guts to solve a puzzle.

That's because you can't "lose" a puzzle. You can only lose a game. And more- people are much more afraid to lose a long time control game.

This is because you invest a lot more of your heart and mind and time into it.

There is no "premade excuse" (ah, it's just a puzzle, ah it's just Blitz of course I didn't see it, etc. etc.)

This is why I regard chess against another human at a long time control to be the ONLY form of "serious chess."

What strategic principle are you referring to here?

Sep-23-09  hms123: <jess>
<What strategic principle are you referring to here?>

Interference. It helps to have seen this before--which is true of puzzles generally, but less so of real positions. In real positions, there can be subtle differences which may a given theme work or not. Therein lies the real challenge.

Sep-23-09  hms123: <jess> BTW, any OTB player would go with <Ne6> and win quickly.
Sep-23-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: Ah yes Knight on <e6> controls the <f8> square so the Black Rook cannot move there to try to defend the position.

Interferes with the Rook's ability to defend (for one more move for cripe sake).

BTW I usually insist that you gentlemen use the proper German terms for these concepts.

The German word for interference is <Panzerkampfwagen Mark IV short barrel>, for example.

Sep-23-09  hms123: <jess> Actually, I was thinking more of <Nf3> interfering with the rook at f2 and the bishop at g2.


click for larger view

Sep-23-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: <Howard> Brilliant!

That's actually the proper solution in fact, which I didn't even find.

DOH

Brilliant---

What a great puzzle.

Sep-23-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: Ok

<Re7+?> wins by force in four moves

<Ne6> wins by force in three moves

But <Nf3!!> wins by force in two moves.

But the main purpose of the puzzle as a training device is not to help you "learn the fastest mating pattern"- it is to teach you about interference and how to recognize that resource when it's available.

HA!

Brilliant puzzle.

Sep-23-09  A Karpov Fan: I am delighted you found that puzzle so entertaining <Jess> :-)

You found the move I dwelt on for a long time ( 1. Ne6 ) as well.

Full agreement from me that playing live, this, or the immediate rook check would be my choice.

As <the cat in the hat> rightly points out, interference was the theme I had in mind.

If I find anymore nice ones like that I will send them over.

regards

malcolm

Sep-23-09  hms123: <A karpov fan> aka <malcolm> A friend of a friend is a friend--stop by my place any time--howard
Sep-24-09  achieve: Wonderful <Lastkraftwagen Reparaturbau>-theme at work there with the Springer nach f-drei.

Hervorragender illustrierung des <Einmischung>-prinzips.

BTW - I think "Einmischung" *is* the correct chess term here in German; Ziemlich sicher. Pretty sure.

Literally translated we'd get something like: intermingling

Sep-24-09  Hugin: Hey Jessica! here is a diffrent Bobby Fischer...He even sings in the end hehe.

Bobby Fischer talks about God, Religion and Love
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bm4u...

Sep-24-09  A Karpov Fan: Maybe it is just my ego talking, but I think I won the best game of the match <Jess> -lol-
Sep-24-09  WBP: <Jess>

Headin' off to Skookum,

To do a little growlin,'

If I see a Lady Bigfoot,

You can bet I'll be a howlin'.

OK, so there's no chess element here, which shall surely not past muster with those Chessgames authorities who vigilantly scrutinize this page like cannibals hungrily eyeing a busload of fat American tourists. (Plus, I guess that's close to a sexually suggestive limerick, and you know what that meant for you and <Dom>. [You should hear the alternative version--even came with a scratch 'n sniff card.])

SO, for the Chessgames authorities looking in:

1. e4

There!!! There's your stinking chess!!!

(Sorry <Jess>, I've had WAY too much coffee.)

Sep-25-09  Boomie: <Shoeless Jessie Jackson>

Sir Nige pulled another little opening surprise and managed to win.

The Effing Mingo played a Najdorf and Nige played 6. a4. Notice that most of the unusual opening moves he plays are perfectly logical. a4 mucks up black's queenside expansion.

After hitting the outside corner with that curve ball, Effing Mungo played the Najdorf like 7...e5 instead of transposing to the more common Schwester Cough e6.

Now mammy's little baby likes Shortnin' brought the wicked slider 8. Nxc6. The OE shows only 8 games before this one with this position. It also shows a ginormous winning percentage for white. Opening Explorer

So it seems the Effer has been conned into an inferior position. Of corpse, more work is needed to prove this refutation of e5.

Sep-25-09  Open Defence: thats Sir Effing Mungo with 2 small ff's
Sep-25-09  Boomie: <OD>

I sit corrected. Thanks for the bird's eye lowdown on that caper...wudever that means.

What in all that is holy are you doing up at 3 AM anyhoo?

Sep-25-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: <Anatoli>

You know on a rare serious note yes - your rapid win was in fact a highlight- partly because the game actually ended with a won position instead of right in the middle because 30 minutes is a RIDICULOUS CLOWN TIME CONTROL.

You know this Rapid business and then even worse the Blitz stuff in this Match-

It's embarrassing.

I'm sorry but there it is. It's almost like they are performing clowns instead of the two greatest players (by far) of the last thirty years.

They are very serious players.

Rapid is not serious chess.

Blitz is even less serious.

This is ridiculous and embarrassing and I wish they never did this.

Sep-25-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: <Hugin Bear>

Thanks! I heard that one before but I'm not sure if I linked it. I will check and put it in if not.

And yes it's wonderful to hear Bobby when he's in a good mood.

And in such a strange context.

He is disarming here partially because of his virtual total ignorance of everything in the world except chess.

Sep-25-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: <Niels> I like "intermingling" better than "interference"-- seems a "deeper" description of the actual tactic.
Sep-25-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: <Timson Weed>

You know the more I think about it the more difficult it is to think of an active player I like more than <GM Nigel Mammy's Little Baby Loves Shortnin' Shortnin'>.

He's a true blue serious chess purist- always was, is now.

Sep-25-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: <Bill> you sound great to me.

There is no such thing as "too much coffee."

Right now my eyes are as big as dinner plates and my whole body is shaking.

Good times!

Sep-26-09  Open Defence: <What in all that is holy are you doing up at 3 AM anyhoo?> playing bullet hehehehehehehe
Sep-26-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: Somebody's got in to the Black Najdorfs again
Sep-26-09  Travis Bickle: Jess and Deffi my chess is suffering. I drew two won games. Im missing crucial moves that I usually dont miss. 1 game I had 2 R's a B and a N to his R!! The pawns were set up in a way where he found refuge behind my pawns after a few weak moves by me. Then I had to try and hunt him down with 12 seconds left, I offered him a draw so he accepted. My opponent was 250 points higher than me so it wasnt all bad. Today I had an equal strength player dead beat. We both were low on time but I missed just taking his N because I was locked into my plan and didnt adjust to his move. Then I missed a sure win when I could have exchanged N's and won on the spot with just my K but I didnt catch that until I was analyzing. I need to do tactical puzzles to sharpen my skills up. I guess drawing isnt as bad as losing. ; P
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 801)
search thread:   
ARCHIVED POSTS
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 633 OF 801 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific user only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Participating Grandmasters are Not Allowed Here!

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
   
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC