jessicafischerqueen Member since Sep-23-06 no bio

jessicafischerqueen has kibitzed 46689 times to chessgames   [more...]

Nov-01-22 jessicafischerqueen chessforum    jessicafischerqueen: Thanks <Fred,> and give my regards to <Mrs Bear> as well!      Sep-07-22 playground player chessforum    jessicafischerqueen: <Ohio> lol and the inevitable "defund the police" thrown in there towards the end, almost as if it's so "de rigeur" that he almost forgot to mention it. Interestingly, the informal "street bosses" who step up to occupy the positions of defunded police street ...      Sep-07-22 Susan Freeman chessforum    jessicafischerqueen: <z> I remember that, unless there was more than one "that" and I missed a few. I recall him flooding the forum with passages from Goethe in order to enrage <Travis Bickle> or; and/or; <Hozza>. Mephistopholes was the work in question. He posted a new ...      Aug-30-22 chessgames.com chessforum    jessicafischerqueen: <OhioMissScarlettFan> I agree with your sentiment here: <OhioChessFan: <Missy> I appreciate your measured tone throughout this. And I agree a very high % of the time with what you're saying. Really, you're mostly saying what I am already thinking.>      Aug-28-22 perfidious chessforum    jessicafischerqueen: Your over there regimen sounds salubrious! Interestingly, in Canada we save time by spelling "music and poker" as "moker." Initially we spelled it "poomus" but that sounded a little too declasse, even for us...      Aug-24-22 Kibitzer's Café    jessicafischerqueen: So the Pacific Ocean can play a boat at chess! Nice one      Aug-24-22 Charles Kalme    jessicafischerqueen: <wwall: Kalme did not win the 1954 US Junior championship. Ross Siemms won in 1954. scoring 7.5. Kalme and Saul Yarmak tied for 2nd-3rd, scoring 7.> According to Imre Konig in "CHESS LIFE (Volume 8, Number 23, August 5, 1954)" The top 4 finishers were: 1. Siemms ...      Aug-22-22 Carel van den Berg    jessicafischerqueen: hmm... or the Furman Wikipedia photo is wrong...      Aug-13-22 Biographer Bistro    jessicafischerqueen: Game Collection: Charousek - Maroczy Game Collection Voting      Aug-10-22 WannaBe chessforum    jessicafischerqueen: <MannBee> sneak preview: TIE ME KANGAROO DOWN, MATE, TIE ME KANGAROO DOWN

indicates a reply to the comment.

Glory, Glory Tottenham Hotspur

ARCHIVED POSTS < Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 642 OF 801 ·  Later Kibitzing> Oct-11-09    dakgootje: He (supposing it's a he) has a nice name actually; freely translated as 'being sarcastic'. onto from the Greek verb for to be ontos (?), compare with ontology which is the philosophical study of being (as in existence). Caustic (in merriam-webster's words) meaning 'marked by incisive sarcasm'. Strengthens my belief someone likes looking words up in dictionaries (and thus writing the harder words consequently right). Oct-11-09    jessicafischerqueen: The admins like <I Like Fish>, and have even parodied him on the chessgames.com forum. Which might explain how he just got away with bloody murder the other day with some hilarious sexual-content posts.... Oct-11-09    achieve: I finally dared to do what I promised some days ago; I asked him to disclose his native language, at the Carlsen page, where he posted some minutes ago... Btw - I am not a fan (on the contrary) of <I like [...]> - but that's - as is the case so many times - a matter of taste, I suppose. Not near onto's shadow, imo. <Strengthens my belief someone likes looking words up in dictionaries (and thus writing the harder words consequently right).> Good chance, I agree. Oct-11-09    dakgootje: oh the tension about what the answer is going to be :P Oct-11-09    achieve: I can....... ...hardly.... ....breathe... Oct-11-09    achieve: <dak> I hope my question was not too impertinent ;p Oct-11-09    A Karpov Fan: Sorry about the miscommunication earlier <Jess>. I really didn't mean to imply chess was easy, or that there is any easy way of playing it. Not that I know of currently anyhow :-) I was looking at this position and thought you might enjoy trying to find the combination. click for larger view White to go and win btw it's from a real game this time, an excellent game too Judit Polgar vs Anand, 1998 Oct-11-09    dakgootje: yay! I got it! *proud* :P Oct-11-09    A Karpov Fan: most impressive <dak>, now you will be nice and warmed up for some of the endgames in my forum :-) Oct-11-09    dakgootje: oi, I knew there was a catch solving the puzzle :( I'll give them a go tomorrow (hopefully) :D If I find the time... which is scarce either way currently and just found out I've <really> got to see <loads> of youtube-videos... yeps, compulsory ;) Oct-11-09    jessicafischerqueen: <dak> you should be proud- very proud, since <Anand> overlooked this beautiful combination during the game. So you can now say "I'm smarter than Vishy"!! Oct-12-09    notyetagm: 42 ? click for larger view 42 ♗d4-c5?? click for larger view 42 ... d5-d4! Δ ... ♗c4-d5 ♖ moves ♖e1-h1# <clearance:d5> click for larger view is a *great* example of what can happen when you <RELEASE A BLOCKADE>. (VAR) 43 ♗c5x♗d6?? ♗c4-d5 click for larger view [Event "Lost Boys op"] [Site "Amsterdam"] [Date "2002.07.26"] [Round "9"] [White "Sutovsky,Emil"] [Black "Van Wely,Loek"] [Result "0-1"] [Eco "B30"] 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 e6 4.0-0 Nge7 5.Re1 a6 6.Bf1 d5 7.d3 h6 8.Nbd2 g6 9.exd5 exd5 10.d4 cxd4 11.Nb3 Bg7 12.Nfxd4 0-0 13.Be3 Re8 14.Qd2 Kh7 15.Nxc6 Nxc6 16.c3 Ne5 17.Bd4 Bf5 18.Qf4 Qg5 19.Qxg5 hxg5 20.Na5 b5 21.Nb7 Nc4 22.b3 Nd2 23.f3 Nxf1 24.Kxf1 g4 25.fxg4 Bxg4 26.h3 Bf5 27.Nd6 Rxe1+ 28.Rxe1 Be6 29.Nb7 Bf8 30.b4 Bf5 31.Re5 Bd3+ 32.Kf2 Bc4 33.a3 Rc8 34.Re3 g5 35.Rf3 Rc7 36.Nc5 a5 37.Na6 Re7 38.bxa5 Re2+ 39.Kg1 Re1+ 40.Kh2 Bd6+ 41.g3 f5 42.Bc5 d4 43.Kg2 Bd5 44.Kf2 Bxf3 45.Kxe1 Bxg3+ 46.Kd2 dxc3+ 47.Kxc3 Be1+ 48.Kd4 Bxa5 49.Bb4 Bd8 50.Kc5 Be2 51.Nb8 Be7+ 52.Kd4 Bf6+ 53.Ke3 Bf1 54.Nd7 Bb2 55.Nf8+ Kh6 56.h4 gxh4 57.Bd6 Kg5 58.Kf3 Bc4 59.Be7+ Kh5 60.Nd7 Bc1 61.Ne5 Bd5+ 62.Kf2 h3 0-1 Oct-12-09    notyetagm: Game Collection: Trapped pieces: lack of mobility, NO RETREAT(!) B Finegold vs D Kuljasevic, 2009 13 .. c6-c5?? cuts off the Black a3-queen's retreat along a3-f8 B Jacobsen vs A Chernin, 2009 28 Nf3-g5?? commit White e5-rook to square with little mobility I Krush vs A Zatonskih, 2009 22 Bd3-f1?? Black f5-bishop controls the d3-,c2-flight squares Oct-12-09    Open Defence: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=px1U... Oct-12-09    Open Defence: Dido a one hit wonder ? Didi ? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h3on... Oct-12-09    Open Defence: this is my favourite Dido song http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xSG7... Oct-12-09    Open Defence: aah I thought I referred to her as a one hit wonder... Oct-12-09    Open Defence: heh I am playing against a guy rated 2367 ... not only has he avoided my Marshall lines.. but he moves instantly.. the moment I move about 15 mins later he logs in and moves... the call is definitely coming from inside the house.... Oct-12-09    dakgootje: <So you can now say "I'm smarter than Vishy"!!> Indeed! Maybe I should challenge him for a game or 10! btw, Dido rocks :P Oct-12-09    jessicafischerqueen: <Deffi> do you mean you suspect him of a little "extra help"? I think his rating might be too low to indicate that no? If you're going to use that kind of assistance, wouldn't you have a 3000 plus rating like all the other cheaters? Maybe he's just online ALL THE TIME. heh You can have them send you a "tweet" in these games when someone moves, if you choose that setting. Well you can at my site anyhoo. Although you know what truth be told- everyone knows that "real ICCF games" permit engine help because there's no way to stop that so you kind of have to. I don't see any real argument against allowing engine use in Correspondence at any level- although I should think it would be more fun for both if engines weren't used. Luckily I never got my rating over 2200 so I sincerely doubt I ever played anyone who got "help". Oct-12-09    dakgootje: <If you're going to use that kind of assistance, wouldn't you have a 3000 plus rating like all the other cheaters?> not if the person doesn't run the engine for that long per move or just had a crappy engine :P <Luckily I never got my rating over 2200> heh, I believe my game-knot rating is still 1700-ish :D Oct-12-09    jessicafischerqueen: <dak> my site starts at a 1400 baseline system so you have to subtract at least 200 points to compare it to other sites- and even then you'd have to know how the other sites work the rating. 1200 is a much more common baseline- that's what <Yahoo> uses for example. Chess.com uses JIMINY GLICKO for example. But not <letsplaychess.com> Oct-12-09    jessicafischerqueen: Also I've retired from Correspondence chess permanently because it gives me hives. Oct-12-09    crawfb5: <jessicafischerqueen: Also I've retired from Correspondence chess permanently because it gives me hives.> Careful, or you'll set off another round of bee song parodies... "What's the buzz? Tell me what's a-happening..." Also, I'm not such a problem ace as you might think. The more "problem-like" the piece placement, the more disoriented I get. Everything seems out of context. I'm better at finding interesting problems than solving them. Oct-12-09    crawfb5: My current opponents at Kingscrusher's site are rated 2726 (1 game), 2649 (2 games), 2445 (2 games), and 2287 (2 games). I think I'm crusin' for a bruisin'... Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 801) search thread:    ARCHIVED POSTS < Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 642 OF 801 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines: No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members. Nothing in violation of United States law. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members. No trolling. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times. See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator. NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific user only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com. If you need an account, register now; it's quick, anonymous, and free! If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.