It's Jess here-

Thanks for that link and the heads up on Bobby's page-

Nice to see that the same five people are continuing the same argument they started five years ago with absolutely no results of any kind yet.

There's no rush to watch the chess videos they are up now permanently I hope-

I have to go back to work in a week and I'm pretty steamed about it. I just want to make chess videos.

I look forward to your latest addition to the "Songs about their true love" series as well. What a great idea- I'm surprised there isn't a compilation CD of such tracks.

<Travis' True Love Songs to Their Actual Girls, not Skeezy Road Hoes> could be a possible title.

Excellent photos of Sir Paul and his dog.

Did you see the comment by the guy who said "What's with all the pictures of Paul and Yoko"?

hahahaha

I can glower with the best of them. Hearing me swear at inanimate objects would turn your hair blue.

I decided my first plan had a hole in it, despite some nice lines. I have another plan, but I still think there should be more there than I am seeing. There's a lot of things up in the air at the same time, and if I overlook a move order or some other finesse, I'm cooked.

You'd think these people have time to read a book, but I suppose they subscribe to <George Costanza's> trenchant observation that

"Finishing a whole book doesn't prove anything!"

My favorite moment from my occasional masochistic glances at the <Kenneth I Paid for an Argument Page> was that worthy constitutional scholar <Kibbutzer NN> capping off a particularly condescending point by announcing that "Habeus Corpus" is not mentioned in the US Constitution.

It is, of course, and not only is the entire document available online in .33 seconds, it's also short enough to fit on the back of a cereal box.

Don't get me wrong- I've no problem with people putting their foot in their mouths, I do it all the time.

This is what comes of spouting from memory without checking facts.

But our local constitutional scholar- all too predictably- forgot to post an "Oh sorry I was wrong about that" after a more alert kibbutzer kindly posted the US Constitution link for him.

This kind of colossal egoism is never pretty. It's always- always really ugly.

Thank god there aren't any "self-appointed scholars" here in Korea.

Well maybe there are but how the hell would I know I can't speak any Korean.

Curling is Death- it is boring almost beyond comprehension. I did it once.

However, it's difficult to defend the joys of watching a long chess match "live" to anyone who's not obsessed with the game.

I wish you the best of luck and skill in your current chess position- I stopped playing Correspondence over a year ago because the positions would interrupt my work, and my sleep by "appearing in my head".

Ok then.

Thanks again for those wonderful <Menchik> resources- It seems the world has forgotten about her, which is a little strange.

Everyone knows about the Polgars.

???

PS I was wrong- I should have checked my facts first-

<Results 1 - 10 of about 364,000 for US constitution habeas corpus. (0.28 seconds)>

Dare playing with it, and you'll emerge the hero.

That was one of the most profound, ah, forget profound, make it "stimulating and thought provoking and inviting"-- things said recently, Jess.

<My favorite moment from my occasional masochistic glances at the <Kenneth I Paid for an Argument Page> was that worthy constitutional scholar <Kibbutzer NN> capping off a particularly condescending point by announcing that "Habeus Corpus" is not mentioned in the US Constitution.>

Might that be because it's "Habe<a>s Corpus" and not Habeus?

Just like Foure is not <Fauré> and Boomie's Loberg might be a typo.

OK - I know you are on the puck, and good to see Canada play ball after the deception against USA. Russia was decimated.

Personally I prefer the technical style of Sweden mostly, and Finnland, but the sheer all court pressure and energy by Canada was equally riveting.

Thanks <Niels>!

But I'm afraid this fellow's point had nothing to do with my bad spelling.

He was very insistent on this "fact" in the discussion- <twinlark> immediately pointed out his "fact" was wrong- posted the link for him- and the fellow never, ever, acknowledged that he had made an error.

This was particularly rude since he had been so huffy and condescending in the "discussion", and in pressing his inaccurate and unfounded point, about which he knew SQUAT, which was my point to begin with.

However, I'm happy to learn the correct spellings.

"habeas corpus"

"faure" (I can't make the accent).

I was wrong I'm a bad speller!

What a great song to wake up with.

Thank you!