|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 60 OF 91 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
| Sep-23-10 | | blue wave: <10...Bb7 11.Nbd2>
If black tries <11...dxc4> then white gets good game as follows.
12.Nxc4 Nd5 13.Bd6 N7f6 14.Bxe7 Qxe7 15.a3 c5 16.e4 Nxe4 17.Qxe4 Nc3 18.Qh4 Qxh4 19.Nxh4 Nxd1 20.Bxb7 Rab8 21.Rxd1 Rxb7 22.dxc5 bxc5
d=11:1/45 score +0.53 |
|
| Sep-23-10 | | Garech: Hi all - done extensive analysis I'd like to share. Some of it is quite lengthy - but those willing to understand will be able to do so =0) Lines given in brackets are alternative continuations, and inferior according to the engine's initial assessment of the position. Enjoy!
-Garech
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 d5 4.g3 Bb4+ 5.Bd2 Be7 6.Bg2 c6 7.O-O O-O 8.Qc2 b6 9.Rd1 Nbd7 10.Bf4 Bb7 11.Nc3 Nh5 12.Bc1 12...Nhf6 13.b3 Rc8 14.e4 Bb4 15.e5 Bxc3 16.Qxc3 Ne4 17.Qd3 c5 18.Ba3 Re8 19.cxd5 exd5 20.Rac1 Re6 Stockfish 1 6 JA : +0.20. Depth: 14. ♘odes: 34 M 12…Nhf6:
13.a3 Qe8 14.b3 Rc8 15.e4 Nxe4 16.Nxe4 dxe4 17.Qxe4 Nf6 18.Qc2 c5 19.Ne5 Bxg2 20.Kxg2 Bd6 21.Bf4 cxd4 22.Rxd4 Bxe5 23.Bxe5 Qe7 Stockfish 1 6 JA : +0.12. Depth: 16. ♘odes: 57.8 M – needs sandpapering) (13.Bf4 dxc4 14.Nd2 Nd5 15.Nxc4 Nxf4 16.gxf4 Stockfish 1 6 JA : 0. Depth: 16. ♘odes: 58.8 M – needs sandpapering) (13.Qb3 c5 14.Bg5 Ne4 15.Bxe7 Qxe7 16.cxd5 Nxc3 17.Qxc3 Bxd5 18.dxc5 Nxc5 19.Qe3 Qb7 20.b4 Na4 21.Rac1 Rac8 22.a3 Rfd8 23.Rxc8 Rxc8 Stockfish 1 6 JA : -0.04. Depth: 16. ♘odes: 59.8 M needs sandpapering) 13.a3!?
13...a5 14.b3 Rc8 15.Bd2 c5 16.dxc5 dxc4 17.bxc4 Rxc5 18.Be3 Rc8 19.Ne5 Bxg2 20.Kxg2 Qc7 21.Nxd7 Nxd7 22.Kg1 Stockfish 1 6 JA : -0.04. Depth: 17. ♘odes: 73.2 M (13...Rc8 14.Bf4 Nh5 15.Be3 Nhf6 16.Bf4 Stockfish 1 6 JA : 0. Depth: 17. ♘odes: 74 M) (13...Re8 14.b3 Ba6 15.Bf4 Rc8 16.Qa2 Nh5 17.Be3 Nhf6 18.Bf4 Stockfish 1 6 JA : 0. Depth: 17. ♘odes: 75.2 M) 13…Rc8 seems most likely, and now comes:
14.e4 dxc4 15.Qa4 a6 16.Qxc4 c5 17.Qe2 b5 18.dxc5 Bxc5 19.Bg5 Qe8 20.Qd2 Be7 21.e5 Nd5 22.Bxe7 Qxe7 23.Ne4 Rc4 24.Nd6 Stockfish 1 6 JA : 0. Depth: 17. ♘odes: 50.9 M (or 13…Rc8 14.Bg5!? (to provoke) h6 15.Bf4 a6 16.Qd3 g5 17.Be5 b5 18.c5 g4 19.Bxf6 Bxf6 20.Nd2 e5 21.e3 exd4 22.exd4 Re8 23.Re1 Stockfish 1 6 JA : -0.08. Depth: 17. ♘odes: 51.7 M) 14.e4…
14...Nxe4 15.Nxe4 dxe4 16.Qxe4 b5 17.Qc2 bxc4 18.Ne5 Nb6 19.Be4 f5 20.Bg2 Bf6 21.Be3 Qc7 22.Nxc4 Nd5 23.Rac1 Nxe3 24.fxe3 Ba6 25.Qa4 Bb5 26.Qb3 Rce8 27.a4 Stockfish 1 6 JA : +0.20. Depth: 18. ♘odes: 137.1 M |
|
| Sep-23-10 | | Garech: (14...Ba6 15.e5 Ne8 16.cxd5 cxd5 17.h4 Nc7 18.Ng5 Bxg5 19.Bxg5 f6 20.exf6 Nxf6 21.a4 Qd7 22.Be3 Nh5 23.Kh2 Qd6 24.b3 Nf6 25.Bf4 Ng4+ 26.Kg1 Stockfish 1 6 JA : +0.28. Depth: 18. ♘odes: 138.8 M needs sandpapering) 14...dxc4 15.Qa4 a6 16.Qxc4 c5 17.Qe2 Re8 18.Bg5 cxd4 19.Nxd4 Qc7 20.Rac1 Qb8 21.Bxf6 Nxf6 22.e5 Nd7 23.Nf5 Nc5 24.Nxe7+ Rxe7 25.Bxb7 Rxb7 26.Rd6 Rbc7 27.Rcd1 b5 28.Qd2 h6 Stockfish 1 6 JA : +0.36. Depth: 18. ♘odes: 140 M needs sandpapering) 15.Nxe4…dxe4 16.Qxe4 forced, and now:
16...b5 17.Qc2 (this line looks good for endgame chances) bxc4 18.Nd2 Nb6 19.Ne4 Nd5 20.Qxc4 c5 21.Nxc5 Nb6 22.Nxb7 Nxc4 23.Nxd8 Rfxd8 24.Rb1 Rb8 25.b4 e5 Stockfish 1 6 JA : +0.36. Depth: 17. ♘odes: 47.3 M – needs sandpapering). (16...Qc7 also possible 17.Qc2 Nf6 18.Bf4 Bd6 19.Bxd6 Qxd6 20.Ne5 Qc7 21.b4 Rfd8 22.c5 Nd5 23.Be4 Nf6 24.Bf3 bxc5 25.bxc5 Stockfish 1 6 JA : +0.48. Depth: 17. ♘odes: 51 M – needs sandpapering) but overall this line looks good for an enduring edge. If …Bb7 11.Nc3 Nh5 12.Bc1 Nhf6 13.a3 Re8:
14.Rb1 Ba6 15.cxd5 cxd5 16.Bf4 Bb7 17.Rbc1 Rc8 18.Qd3 a6 19.Rc2 h6 20.Rdc1 Nh5 21.Be3 Nhf6 22.Bf4 Stockfish 1 6 JA : 0. Depth: 17. ♘odes: 81 M 14.Bg5 h6 15.Bf4 Nh5 16.Be3 Nhf6 17.Bf4 Stockfish 1 6 JA : 0. Depth: 16. ♘odes: 83 M So completely level…but what about 14.e4!:
14...dxc4 15.Be3 b5 16.Bh3 a6 17.Ng5 Nh5 18.f4 Qc7 19.Bg4 g6 20.Bxh5 gxh5 21.Qe2 h6 22.Nf3 c5 23.d5 Nf6 Stockfish 1 6 JA : -0.48. Depth: 15. ♘odes: 63.4 M is easily best, but an interesting line goes: 14.e4 dxc4 15.e5 Nd5 16.Ne4 b5 Bg5!
With best play given as:
17.Bg5 f6 18.exf6 gxf6 19.Bh6 Qb6 20.a4 a6 21.Bh3 c5 22.a5 Qc6 23.dxc5 Bxc5 24.Qd2 Qc7 25.Nd4 Qe5 26.Nxc5 Nxc5 Stockfish 1 6 JA : -0.44. Depth: 15. ♘odes: 21.4 M 17...f6 18.exf6 gxf6 19.Bh6 f5 20.Nc3 Bf6 21.Qd2 Nxc3 22.bxc3 c5 23.a4 a6 24.Bf4 Be4 25.Ne5 Bxg2 26.Kxg2 cxd4 27.Nc6 Qb6 28.axb5 axb5 29.Nxd4 Stockfish 1 6 JA : -0.64. Depth: 15. ♘odes: 55.4 M |
|
| Sep-23-10 | | Garech: (17...Qc7 18.Bxe7 Rxe7 19.Rac1 f6 20.exf6 gxf6 21.b3 cxb3 22.Qxb3 a6 23.Re1 Rae8 24.Bh3 f5 25.Nc3 Nxc3 26.Qxc3 c5 27.dxc5 Bxf3 28.Qxf3 Nxc5 Stockfish 1 6 JA : -0.40. Depth: 15. ♘odes: 58.6 M) (17...Qb6 18.Bxe7 Rxe7 19.Nd6 c5 20.Ng5 g6 21.dxc5 Nxc5 22.Nge4 Nxe4 23.Bxe4 Rd7 24.a4 a6 25.Bxd5 Bxd5 26.axb5 axb5 27.Nxc4 Qc6 28.Rxa8+ Qxa8 Stockfish 1 6 JA : -0.32. Depth: 15. ♘odes: 60.2 M) At the right time, Bg5 is a definite contender.
13.e4!?:
13.e4 (probably too early) dxc4 14.b3:
13...dxc4 14.b3 (given as best, but not a pretty gambit) cxb3 15.axb3 Qc8 16.e5 Nd5 17.Ng5 Bxg5 18.Bxg5 c5 19.Nxd5 Bxd5 20.Bxd5 exd5 21.dxc5 Nxe5 22.Qc3 d4 23.Rxd4 bxc5 Stockfish 1 6 JA : -0.12. Depth: 15. ♘odes: 42.3 M needs sandpapering: 14.b3 cxb3 15.axb3 a5 16.Ne5 Nxe5 17.dxe5 Nd7 18.Be3 c5 19.Bf1 Bc6 20.Bb5 Qc8 21.f4 Bxb5 22.Nxb5 Rd8 Stockfish 1 6 JA : -0.20. Depth: 14. ♘odes: 38.9 M 13.e4 dxc4 14.b3 cxb3 15.axb3 a5 16.Ne5 Nxe5 17.dxe5 Nd7 18.Be3 c5 19.Bf1 Bc6 20.Bb5 Qc8 21.f4 Bxb5 22.Nxb5 Rd8 Stockfish 1 6 JA : -0.20. Depth: 14. ♘odes: 38.9 M 14…cxb3 only move worth considering, and now comes: 15.axb3 15...a5 16.Bf4 Qc8 17.Be3 Ba6 18.Ne5 Nxe5 19.dxe5 Nd7 20.Na4 Rb8 21.f4 Bb4 22.Rac1 c5 Stockfish 1 6 JA : -0.36. Depth: 15. ♘odes: 32.5 M 15...Re8 16.Be3 a5 17.Ne5 Rc8 18.Na4 Qc7 19.Nc4 b5 20.Bf4 Qd8 21.Nc5 Bxc5 22.Nxa5 Bxd4 23.Nxb7 Qb6 24.Nd6 Bxa1 25.Nxc8 Rxc8 26.Rxa1 Stockfish 1 6 JA : -0.36. Depth: 14. ♘odes: 34.4 M or 15...h6 16.Bf4 a5 17.Ne5 Nxe5 18.dxe5 Nd7 19.Be3 Qe8 20.Na4 b5 21.Nb6 Nxb6 22.Bxb6 Bb4 23.Bf3 Ra6 24.Be3 Stockfish 1 6 JA : -0.20. Depth: 14. ♘odes: 35.8 M in a nutshell, 14.b3 is a load of bollocks.
13.e4 dxc4 14.e5!?:
14…Nd5 easily best, and now: |
|
| Sep-23-10 | | Garech: 15.Ne4 b5 16.Bg5 Nb4 17.Qb1 h6 18.Bxe7 Qxe7 19.a3 Nd5 20.a4 a6 21.Nd6 Rfb8 22.Re1 c5 23.axb5 axb5 24.Rxa8 Bxa8 Stockfish 1 6 JA : -0.44. Depth: 15. ♘odes: 59.1 M 15...b5 16.Neg5 g6 17.Ne4 Qc7 18.Qd2 Rfd8 19.Qh6 Bf8 20.Qh4 c5 21.Bg5 Rdc8 22.dxc5 Bxc5 23.Nxc5 Nxc5 24.Qh6 Nd3 Stockfish 1 6 JA : -0.48. Depth: 14. ♘odes: 37.8 M (or she may give the pawn back with something like 15...h6 16.Qxc4 Qc7 17.Bd2 c5 18.Rac1 Rac8 19.Qb3 Qb8 20.Qa4 Rfd8 21.Bf1 cxd4 22.Rxc8 Qxc8 23.Qxd4 Stockfish 1 6 JA : -0.12. Depth: 14. ♘odes: 39.7 M – this deserves a look) 16.Bd2 c5 17.dxc5 Nxc5 18.Nxc5 Bxc5 19.Ng5 g6 20.Ne4 Qc7 21.Bg5 Be7 22.Bxe7 Qxe7 23.a4 a6 24.Qd2 Qc7 25.Nd6 Rfd8 26.Qd4 Qd7 27.Qc5 Bc6 28.Bxd5 exd5 Stockfish 1 6 JA : -0.36. Depth: 17. ♘odes: 130.8 M (16.Bg5 N7b6 17.Qd2 Bxg5 18.Nfxg5 h6 19.Nh3 Qc7 20.Rac1 Rad8 21.Qa5 Qb8 22.Nd6 Rd7 23.Nf4 Nxf4 24.gxf4 Rfd8 25.b3 Rxd6 26.exd6 Rxd6 Stockfish 1 6 JA : -0.52. Depth: 17. ♘odes: 132.8 M) (16.Neg5 g6 17.Qe4 c3 18.Qc2 c5 19.dxc5 cxb2 20.Qxb2 Nxc5 21.Qxb5 Qb6 22.Qc4 h6 23.Nh3 Ba6 24.Qc2 Nb4 25.Qd2 Rfd8 Stockfish 1 6 JA : -0.60. Depth: 17. ♘odes: 134.7 M) |
|
| Sep-23-10 | | goslinga: <blue wave> More on the Nd2 line: 10. ...Bb7 11. Nbd2... maybe 17. Nh4 is not so good: blue wave (hiarcs d=12:1/38 +0.36):
10. ...Bb7 11. Nbd2 c5 12. dxc5 Bxc5 13. Nb3 Be7 14. cd5 Rc8 15. Qd3 Nxd5 16. e4 N5f6 17. Nh4* Qe8
18. Rdc1 Nc5 19. Nxc5 Bxc5 20. e5 Nd5 21. Bxd5 exd5
However (Rybka -0.18):
10. ...Bb7 11. Nbd2 c5 12. dxc5 Bxc5 13. Nb3 Be7 14. cd5 Rc8 15. Qd3 Nxd5 16. e4 N5f6 17. Nh4 h6*
18. e5...
Nh4 on move 17 may get white into difficulties, I suggest Ne1 instead (Rybka -0.04):
10. ...Bb7 11. Nbd2 c5 12. dxc5 Bxc5 13. Nb3 Be7 14. cd5 Rc8 15. Qd3 Nxd5 16. e4 N5f6 17. Ne1 Qe8
18. Bd6 h6 19. e5 Nd5 20. Bxe7 Qxe7 21. Qd4 (Qe2/Qe4) However best line sofar (Rybka 0.0):
10. ...Bb7 11. Nbd2 c5 12. dxc5 Bxc5 13. cd5 Rc8 14. Qd3 Nxd5 15. Ne4 Be7 16. Qd2 N7f6
17. Nxf6+ Nxf6 18. Rac1 Qxd2 19. Bxd2 Rfd8 20. Rxc8 Rxc8 21. Nd4 Bd5 22. Bxd5 Nxd5
23. Rc1 Rxc1 24. Bxc1 Nb4 25. a3 Bf6 26. Nb5 Nc6 27. Kg2 |
|
| Sep-23-10 | | Garech: I will summarise this and post valuable findings in the main forum at a later date - I just wanted to put it out there for others to have a gander if they wish. More coming right up! The next segment revolves around 11...Rc8 and trying to find a winning endgame in the resulting position - it has been quite elusive, but white is definitely better in the resulting positions: 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 d5 4.g3 Bb4+ 5.Bd2 Be7 6.Bg2 c6 7.O-O O-O 8.Qc2 b6 9.Rd1 Nbd7 10.Bf4 Bb7 11.Nc3 Rc8 11…Rc8
12.e4 dxc4 13.Qa4 b5 14.Qxa7 Qb6 15.Qxb6 Nxb6 16.a3 Rfd8 17.Be3 Ng4 18.Bf4 Nf6 Stockfish 1 6 JA : 0. Depth: 15. ♘odes: 56.3 M Sandpapered below: (12…dxc4) (12.Rac1 Nh5 13.Be3 Nhf6 14.Qb3 c5 15.cxd5 Nxd5 16.Nxd5 Bxd5 17.Qa4 Bf6 18.Bf4 cxd4 19.Rxc8 Qxc8 20.Qxa7 Stockfish 1 6 JA : +0.04. Depth: 15. ♘odes: 57.6 M) 12...dxc4 (only decent move) 13.b3 cxb3 14.axb3 a5 15.Qe2 Bb4 16.Na2 Ba3 17.Nc3 Be7 18.Ne5 Nxe5 19.Bxe5 Nd7 20.Bf4 c5 21.d5 e5 22.d6 Bxd6 23.Rxd6 exf4 24.gxf4 Stockfish 1 6 JA : -0.32. Depth: 16. ♘odes: 191 M 13.Qa4 b5 14.Qxa7 Qb6 15.Qxb6 Nxb6 16.a3 Rfd8 17.Rac1 h6 18.Ne5 Nbd7 19.f3 Nxe5 20.Bxe5 Nh5 21.Bh3 Nf6 22.Kg2 Ra8 23.Kf2 h5 Stockfish 1 6 JA : +0.16. Depth: 15. ♘odes: 40.2 M 13...b5 14.Qxa7 Qb6 15.Qxb6 Nxb6 16.a3 Rfd8 17.Re1 h6 18.Rac1 Ng4 19.h3 Nf6 20.Red1 c5 21.e5 Nfd5 22.Nxb5 Nxf4 23.gxf4 cxd4 24.Nfxd4 Nd5 Stockfish 1 6 JA : +0.08. Depth: 17. ♘odes: 54.1 M (13...a6 14.Qxc4 b5 15.Qe2 b4 16.Na4 Qa5 17.b3 Qb5 18.Qe1 c5 19.dxc5 Nxc5 20.Nd4 Qa5 21.e5 Nd5 22.Nf5 exf5 23.Bxd5 Qb5 24.Nxc5 Bxd5 25.Rxd5 Rxc5 26.Rxc5 Bxc5 27.Qf1 Qc6 28.Rc1 Qb6 29.Qe2 Re8 Stockfish 1 6 JA : +0.24. Depth: 17. ♘odes: 55.2 M – needs sandpapering) (13...Nh5 14.Be3 Qc7 15.Qxc4 b5 16.Qb3 b4 17.Na4 c5 18.dxc5 Nxc5 19.Nxc5 Bxc5 20.Rac1 Qa5 21.Rxc5 Rxc5 22.Bxc5 Qxc5 23.Ne1 a5 24.Nd3 Qb5 25.a4 Qb6 26.Ne5 Nf6 Stockfish 1 6 JA : +0.28. Depth: 17. ♘odes: 56.4 M – dubious but maybe worth a look) 14.Qxa7 only viable move, and now:
14…Qb6 is easily best, so the queens come off, hopefully leading to a good endgame for white: 14...Qb6 15.Qxb6 Nxb6 (last two forced) 16.a3 Rfd8 17.Ne5 Nbd7 18.Nxd7 Rxd7 19.f3 Ra8 20.Kf2 Rad8 21.Be5 Nh5 22.Bh3 Bf6 23.Bg4 Bxe5 24.dxe5 Stockfish 1 6 JA : +0.04. Depth: 14. ♘odes: 30.8 M 15…Nxb6, leading to:
16.a3 Rfd8 17.Ne5 Ra8 18.Bf3 Nbd7 19.Rdc1 Nxe5 20.Bxe5 Rd7 21.g4 h6 22.h4 g5 23.hxg5 hxg5 24.Re1 Rdd8 25.Rac1 Kg7 26.Kg2 Rh8 Stockfish 1 6 JA : +0.04. Depth: 14. ♘odes: 26.3 M |
|
| Sep-23-10 | | Garech: Sandpapered:
16...Rfd8 17.Ne5 Ra8 18.f3 Nh5 19.Be3 f6 20.Ng4 Na4 21.Nxa4 Rxa4 22.Kf2 Raa8 23.Rdc1 Bd6 24.Ke2 Bc7 25.a4 Kf7 Stockfish 1 6 JA : +0.08. Depth: 17. ♘odes: 47.7 M (16...Ra8 17.Ne5 Rfd8 18.f3 Nh5 19.Be3 Na4 20.Nxa4 Rxa4 21.Kf2 f6 22.Ng4 Raa8 23.Rdc1 Bd6 24.e5 Bc7 25.exf6 gxf6 Stockfish 1 6 JA : +0.08. Depth: 17. ♘odes: 49.4 M –transposition of above.) (16...Nbd7 17.Re1 Rfd8 18.Rad1 Nf8 19.Ne5 N8d7 20.Nxd7 Rxd7 21.e5 Nd5 22.Bxd5 exd5 23.e6 Rdd8 24.f3 b4 25.axb4 fxe6 26.Rxe6 Bxb4 Stockfish 1 6 JA : +0.12. Depth: 16. ♘odes: 54 M – probably inferior) 17.Re1 h6 18.Rac1 Nbd7 19.Rcd1 Nh5 20.Be3 Nhf6 21.Bf4 Stockfish 1 6 JA : 0. Depth: 17. ♘odes: 60.8 M (17.Nd2 Ng4 18.Nf3 Nf6 Stockfish 1 6 JA : 0. Depth: 17. ♘odes: 71.8 M) (17.Be3 Ng4 18.Bf4 Nf6 Stockfish 1 6 JA : 0. Depth: 17. ♘odes: 73.3 M) Three draws by repetition. How does white proceed from this position…? What about Ne5? 17.Re1 h6 18.Rac1 Nbd7 19.Rcd1 g5 20.Be3 Kg7 21.h4 g4 22.Nd2 Nb6 23.d5 Nbd7 24.d6 Bxd6 25.Nxc4 Bxg3 26.fxg3 bxc4 Stockfish 1 6 JA : +0.08. Depth: 18. ♘odes: 151.2 M Perhaps – Sandpapered: 17...Ba6 (this loss of tempo must be bad, but it’s given as best play) 18.Rad1 Bb7 19.Bg5 h6 20.Bd2 Ra8 21.Bf4 Ra6 22.Bc7 Rc8 23.Bf4 Rd8 Stockfish 1 6 JA : 0. Depth: 16. ♘odes: 34.5 M (17...h6 18.Rad1 g5 19.Be3 Ng4 20.Bd2 Nf6 21.h4 gxh4 22.Nxh4 Rxd4 23.Nf3 Rdd8 24.Be3 Na4 25.Rxd8+ Rxd8 26.Nxa4 bxa4 27.Bxh6 Stockfish 1 6 JA : +0.16. Depth: 16. ♘odes: 35.4 M) (17...Nbd7 18.Rad1 Nb6 19.Bg5 h6 20.Bd2 Nfd7 21.Be3 Ra8 22.Bf4 Na4 23.Nxa4 Rxa4 24.Bc7 Rda8 25.Rc1 Stockfish 1 6 JA : +0.16. Depth: 16. ♘odes: 36.6 M) after 17…Ba6:
18.Be3 (looked right for a long time – may still work) Ng4 19.Bc1 Nf6 20.Bg5 h6 21.Be3 Nbd7 22.h3 Bb7 23.Bf4 Ra8 24.Rac1 Rac8 25.Ra1 Stockfish 1 6 JA : 0. Depth: 15. ♘odes: 45.5 M (18.h4 Bb7 19.Rac1 c5 20.Nxb5 Bxe4 21.Be5 Bd5 22.Bc7 Rxc7 23.Nxc7 Bxf3 24.Bxf3 cxd4 25.Red1 d3 26.Rd2 Bd6 27.Nb5 Bf8 28.Kg2 Bc5 Stockfish 1 6 JA : +0.08. Depth: 15. ♘odes: 48.9 M is another try) |
|
| Sep-23-10 | | Garech: (18. a4!? Also worth a look p probably best chances. Sandpapered: 18...Nxa4 19.Nxa4 bxa4 20.Rxa4 Bb5 21.Ra7 Bb4 22.Rea1 Nxe4 23.Ne5 f5 24.Bxe4 fxe4 25.Rb7 Rxd4 26.Nxc6 Bxc6 27.Rxb4 Rcd8 28.Be3 Rd1+ 29.Rxd1 Rxd1+ 30.Kg2 Bd5 31.Ra4 Stockfish 1 6 JA : -0.20. Depth: 17. ♘odes: 38.9 M interesting gambit line: 18.a4 Nxa4 19.Nxa4 bxa4 20.Rxa4 Bb5 21.Ra7 Bb4 22.Rd1 Nxe4 23.Ne5 Nd6 ] 18...b4 19.Nd1 Nbd7 20.a5 c5 21.d5 exd5 22.e5 Nh5 23.e6 Ndf6 24.exf7+ Kxf7 25.Ng5+ Ke8 26.Be5 Ng4 27.Nxh7 Kf7 Stockfish 1 6 JA : -0.12. Depth: 17. ♘odes: 40.4 M 19…Ng4 only move after 18.Be3, and now:
19.Bd2 Nf6 20.Bh3 Bb7 21.Bf4 Nbd7 22.Bg2 h6 23.Rac1 Nb6 24.Be3 Nbd7 25.Bd2 Ra8 26.Be3 Nb6 27.Bf4 Rac8 Stockfish 1 6 JA : 0. Depth: 19. ♘odes: 236.9 M and
(19.Bc1 Nf6 20.Bg5 h6 21.Be3 Nbd7 22.Bf4 Bb7 23.Rac1 Nb6 24.Be3 Nbd7 25.Bd2 Ra8 26.Be3 Nb6 27.Bf4 Rac8 Stockfish 1 6 JA : 0. Depth: 19. ♘odes: 239.2 M) 20.Bg5 looks interesting… (could have transposed on the 18th move) 20...h6 21.Be3 Nbd7 22.h3 Bb7 23.Rac1 b4 24.axb4 Bxb4 25.Ra1 c5 26.d5 exd5 27.Ra7 d4 28.Rxb7 dxc3 29.bxc3 Bxc3 Stockfish 1 6 JA : +0.04. Depth: 15. ♘odes: 27.8 M (20...Na4 21.Nxa4 bxa4 22.Rac1 h6 23.Bd2 Rb8 24.Ba5 Rf8 25.Bc3 c5 26.dxc5 Bxc5 27.Ne5 Rb3 28.Rc2 Rfb8 29.Bf1 R3b7 30.Bxc4 Bxc4 31.Nxc4 Stockfish 1 6 JA : +0.28. Depth: 15. ♘odes: 29.3 M must be losing) (20...Rc7 21.Rad1 h6 22.Bc1 Rcc8 23.Ne5 c5 24.d5 b4 25.axb4 cxb4 26.Nc6 Re8 27.Nxe7+ Rxe7 28.d6 Rd7 Stockfish 1 6 JA : +0.24. Depth: 15. ♘odes: 31.6 M looks inferior) 21.Bf4 Bb7 22.Rac1 Ba6 23.Ra1 Stockfish 1 6 JA : 0. Depth: 21. ♘odes: 751.4 M (21.Bd2 c5 22.d5 exd5 23.exd5 Nbxd5 24.Nxd5 Nxd5 25.Ba5 Rd6 26.Nd2 Kf8 27.Ne4 Rg6 28.Bh3 Ra8 29.Bf5 Rc6 30.Bd7 Rg6 31.Bf5 Stockfish 1 6 JA : 0. Depth: 21. ♘odes: 753.6 M-worth investigating. (21.Be3 c5 22.dxc5 Bxc5 23.Bxc5 Rxc5 24.Red1 Rxd1+ 25.Rxd1 Na4 26.Rd8+ Kh7 27.e5 Nxc3 28.exf6 Rd5 29.Rf8 Rd1+ 30.Bf1 Ne4 31.Rxf7 c3 32.Rxg7+ Kh8 33.Ra7 cxb2 34.Ra8+ Kh7 35.f7 Rxf1+ 36.Kxf1 b1=Q+ 37.Kg2 b4 38.Rh8+ Kxh8 39.f8=Q+ Kh7 40.Qf7+ Kh8 41.Qf8+ Kh7 Stockfish 1 6 JA : 0. Depth: 21. ♘odes: 755.6 M) 21.Be3 sandpapered:
21...Ng4 22.Bf4 Nf6 23.Be3 Stockfish 1 6 JA : 0. Depth: 15. ♘odes: 21.4 M |
|
| Sep-23-10 | | Garech: (21...Nbd7 22.Bf4 Bb7 23.Rad1 g5 24.Bd2 Ra8 25.Be3 Ng4 26.Bd2 Ngf6 Stockfish 1 6 JA : 0. Depth: 15. ♘odes: 20.7 M) Best line so far:
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 d5 4.g3 Bb4+ 5.Bd2 Be7 6.Bg2 c6 7.O-O O-O 8.Qc2 b6 9.Rd1 Nbd7 10.Bf4 Bb7 11.Nc3 Rc8 12.e4 dxc4 13.Qa4 b5 (other moves are possible here to avoid the queen exchange and need exploring) 14.Qxa7 Qb6 15.Qxb6 Nxb6 16.a3 Rfd8 17.Re1 And how does black proceed?
…Ba6 is probably best
…h6
…Nbd7
is answered with 18.e5!
…Ng4 |
|
Sep-23-10
 | | kutztown46: After 10...Nh5
click for larger viewAnalysis by Houdini 1.03a x64 4_CPU (26-ply):
1. = (0.19): 11.cxd5 cxd5 12.Bc7 Qe8 13.Nc3 Ndf6 14.Nd2 Ba6 15.Bf3 Rc8 16.Be5 g6 17.g4 Ng7 18.h3 Nd7 19.Bh2 f5 20.Qa4 Nb8 21.Qxe8 Rfxe8 22.Rac1 Rf8 2. = (0.13): 11.Bc1 Nhf6 12.a3 Bb7 13.Nc3 h6 14.b3 Rc8 15.Bb2 a5 16.e4 a4 17.bxa4 dxc4 18.Qe2 c5 19.d5 exd5 3. = (0.07): 11.Be3 Nhf6 12.cxd5 cxd5 13.Nc3 Bb7 14.Rac1 a6 15.Qb3 Rc8 16.Na4 b5 17.Rxc8 Qxc8 18.Nc5 Bxc5 19.Rc1 e5 20.dxc5 d4 21.Bg5 Bd5 22.Qc2 4. = (0.05): 11.Bd2 Nhf6 12.a3 Bb7 13.Bf4 h6 14.Nc3 dxc4 15.Ne5 Nd5 16.Nxc4 Nxf4 17.gxf4 Qc7 18.e3 Rac8 19.Rac1 a5 20.Qb3 Rcd8 5. = (0.00): 11.Be5 Bb7 12.Nc3 f6 13.Bh3 fxe5 14.Bxe6+ Kh8 15.cxd5 exd4 16.dxc6 Bxc6 17.Nxd4 Bb7 18.Nf3 Bc6 19.Nd4 Bb7 6. = (-0.01): 11.e3 Ba6 12.cxd5 cxd5 13.Nc3 Bb7 14.Qe2 a6 15.Be5 Rc8 16.Rac1 b5 17.Ne1 Nhf6 18.Bxf6 Nxf6 19.Nd3 h6 |
|
| Sep-23-10 | | Garech: Okay, that's it for now.
G'night!
-Garech |
|
Sep-23-10
| | kutztown46: After 10. Bf4
click for larger viewAnalysis by Stockfish 1.8 JA 64bit (30-ply):
1. = (0.00): 10...Bb7 11.Nc3 Nh5 12.Be3 Nhf6 13.Bf4
2. = (0.20): 10...Nh5 11.cxd5 cxd5 12.Bc7 Qe8 13.Nc3 Ba6 14.Qa4 Rc8 15.Qxa6 Rxc7 16.Qa4 a5 17.Ne5 Nxe5 18.Qxe8 Rxe8 19.dxe5 Rd8 20.Bf3 g6 21.Kg2 Rcc8 22.Bxh5 gxh5 23.Rac1 f6 24.exf6 Bxf6 25.Na4 b5 26.Nc5 3. = (0.20): 10...Ba6 11.Ne5 Qc8 12.Nc3 Nh5 13.Bd2 Nhf6 14.cxd5 cxd5 15.Qa4 b5 16.Nxb5 Nxe5 17.dxe5 Qc6 18.Nc3 Qxa4 19.Nxa4 Ng4 20.e4 d4 21.Bf4 g5 22.Bf3 h5 23.h3 gxf4 24.hxg4 fxg3 25.Rxd4 Bh4 26.fxg3 4. ² (0.28): 10...h6 11.cxd5 cxd5 12.Ne5 Bb7 13.Nc6 Bxc6 14.Qxc6 Qc8 15.Qb5 Qc2 16.Nc3 a6 17.Qb3 Qxb3 18.axb3 Rfc8 19.Rdc1 g5 20.Bd2 Nb8 21.Na4 Nbd7 22.Rxc8+ Rxc8 23.Nc3 a5 24.f4 gxf4 25.Bxf4 Kg7 5. ² (0.36): 10...dxc4 11.Qxc4 Bb7 12.Nc3 Nd5 13.Rac1 Nxf4 14.gxf4 Qc7 15.e3 Rfd8 16.Qe2 Bb4 17.Ne5 Nxe5 18.fxe5 Rac8 19.Be4 Rd7 20.Qh5 h6 21.Qf3 Bxc3 22.Rxc3 c5 23.Bxb7 Qxb7 24.Qxb7 Rxb7 25.Kg2 c4 6. ² (0.36): 10...Kh8 11.Nbd2 Nh5 12.cxd5 Nxf4 13.dxc6 Nxg2 14.cxd7 Ba6 15.Ne4 Ne3 16.fxe3 Qxd7 17.Ne5 Qb7 18.Rac1 Rac8 19.Nc3 Kg8 20.Nd3 Bg5 21.Nf4 Bc4 22.e4 Rfd8 23.e3 Ba6 24.Qg2 7. ² (0.48): 10...Qe8 11.Nc3 Ba6 12.cxd5 Nxd5 13.Rac1 Nxf4 14.gxf4 Rc8 15.Ng5 g6 16.e3 Bb7 17.Qb3 Rb8 18.Qa4 a6 19.Qb3 b5 20.Nce4 Rc8 21.Nc5 Nxc5 22.dxc5 Bxg5 23.fxg5 Qe7 24.f4 8. ² (0.48): 10...a6 11.b3 Bb7 12.Nc3 b5 13.c5 a5 14.a3 Re8 15.b4 a4 16.Re1 Nf8 17.e4 dxe4 18.Nxe4 Nxe4 19.Qxe4 Ng6 20.Ne5 Rc8 21.Nxg6 hxg6 22.Rad1 Qd7 23.Be5 g5 24.Qg4 Rcd8 |
|
Sep-23-10
| | kutztown46: After 10...Bb7
click for larger viewAnalysis by Stockfish 1.8 JA 64bit (30-ply):
1. = (0.00): 11.Nbd2 c5 12.cxd5 Nxd5 13.Ne4 cxd4 14.Nxd4 Rc8 15.Nc3 N7f6 16.Qb3 Bc5 17.Nf5 Ng4 18.Ne3 Nxf2 19.Kxf2 Nxe3 20.Bxe3 Qf6+ 21.Bf3 Bxe3+ 22.Kxe3 Qh6+ 23.Kf2 Qxh2+ 24.Kf1 Qh3+ 25.Kf2 Qh2+ 2. = (0.00): 11.Ne5 Nh5 12.Be3 Nhf6 13.Bf4
3. = (0.00): 11.a3 Rc8 12.Nc3 dxc4 13.Nd2 Nd5 14.Nxc4 Nxf4 15.gxf4 Qc7 16.e3 Rfd8 17.Rac1 a6 18.Ne4 h6 19.Qb3 a5 20.Ne5 Nxe5 21.dxe5 Rxd1+ 22.Rxd1 Rd8 23.Rxd8+ Qxd8 24.Nd6 Bxd6 25.exd6 Qxd6 26.Qxb6 Qd1+ 4. = (0.00): 11.Nc3 dxc4 12.Nd2 Nd5 13.Nxc4 Nxf4 14.gxf4 Qc7 15.Ne5 Rac8 16.Rac1 Rfd8 17.e3 Qb8 18.Be4 Nf6 19.Bg2 Nd7 5. = (-0.08): 11.Nfd2 Qc8 12.cxd5 Nxd5 13.Nc3 Nxf4 14.gxf4 Nf6 15.e3 c5 16.Bxb7 Qxb7 17.dxc5 Bxc5 18.Nde4 Be7 19.Rd2 Nxe4 20.Qxe4 Qxe4 21.Nxe4 Rfd8 22.Rad1 f5 23.Nd6 a6 24.Kg2 b5 25.Kf3 h6 26.b4 6. = (-0.12): 11.Ne1 Qc8 12.Nd2 c5 13.dxc5 bxc5 14.Nd3 Nh5 15.cxd5 exd5 16.Bf3 Nhf6 17.Rac1 Re8 18.Qb1 a5 19.Bg2 a4 20.Nf3 Ne4 21.Nfe5 Nxe5 22.Bxe5 Qf5 23.Bf4 g5 24.f3 Nf6 25.g4 7. = (-0.12): 11.a4 Rc8 12.Nc3 dxc4 13.Ne5 Nxe5 14.dxe5 Nd5 15.Ne4 Ba6 16.Nd6 Bxd6 17.exd6 Qd7 18.Be4 Nxf4 19.gxf4 f5 20.Bg2 Rce8 21.a5 b5 22.Qc3 Rc8 23.Ra3 Rfd8 24.Qe5 b4 25.Re3 c3 26.bxc3 8. = (-0.20): 11.cxd5 cxd5 12.Qd3 Rc8 13.Na3 a6 14.Rac1 b5 15.Rxc8 Qxc8 16.Rc1 Qa8 17.Rc7 Rc8 18.Nc2 Rxc7 19.Bxc7 Qc8 20.Ba5 Qc6 21.Nd2 Nb6 22.Qc3 Qxc3 23.bxc3 Nfd7 24.Ne3 f5 25.f4 Kf7 26.Kf2 g5 |
|
| Sep-23-10 | | thegoodanarchist: recent analysis by Deep Shredder 12:
10….Ba6 11.Nbd2 Nh5 12.Be3 Bd6 13.Rac1 Qe7 (+0.17) 23/23 14.Bg5 f6 15.Be3 (13…h6 14.Qa4 Bb7 15.Ne1 Qe7 16.Nd3 +0.19 20/20)
sandpapered |
|
Sep-23-10
| | kutztown46: After 10...Ba6
click for larger viewAnalysis by Stockfish 1.8 JA 64bit (30-ply):
1. = (0.12): 11.Ne5 Rc8 12.cxd5 Nxd5 13.Nc3 Nxe5 14.dxe5 Qc7 15.Nxd5 cxd5 16.Qxc7 Rxc7 17.e4 dxe4 18.Bxe4 Rfc8 19.Kg2 g5 20.Be3 h6 21.Rac1 Rxc1 22.Rxc1 Rxc1 23.Bxc1 Bc5 24.b3 Kg7 25.f4 gxf4 26.Bxf4 2. = (0.00): 11.b3 Rc8 12.Nc3 Nh5 13.Bc1 Nhf6 14.Bf4 3. = (0.00): 11.Nbd2 Nh5 12.Be3 Nhf6 13.Bg5 h6 14.Bxf6 Bxf6 15.e4 Bb7 16.Rac1 Rc8 17.Qb3 Be7 18.Ne1 dxe4 19.Nxe4 Nf6 20.Nc3 Qc7 21.Nd3 Rfd8 22.Ne5 Nd7 23.Nd3 Nf8 24.Ne5 Nd7 4. = (0.00): 11.cxd5 cxd5 12.Ne5 Qc8 13.Nc3 Nh5 14.Be3 Nhf6 15.Bg5 h6 16.Bxf6 Bxf6 17.Ng4 Rb8 18.e4 dxe4 19.Bxe4 Rd8 20.d5 Bxc3 21.bxc3 Nc5 22.Ne3 Bb5 23.a4 Nxe4 24.Qxe4 Bd7 25.c4 Qc5 26.d6 Rdc8 5. = (0.00): 11.Nfd2 Nh5 12.Be3 Nhf6 13.Bf4
6. ³ (-0.68): 11.Na3 Bxa3 12.cxd5 Bxb2 13.Qxb2 cxd5 14.Ne5 Rc8 15.a4 h6 16.Bf3 Nxe5 17.dxe5 Nd7 18.e4 g5 19.Be3 Qc7 20.Bd4 dxe4 21.Bxe4 Nc5 22.Rac1 Qe7 23.Qa3 Rfd8 24.Bf3 Bb7 25.Be2 a5 26.Bb5 Rd5 |
|
Sep-23-10
| | kutztown46: <OhioChessFan: How should I edit the header to Engine Room 1?> I was just thinking you could mention that there are two Engine Rooms and briefly explain the function of each and maybe put a link to ER2. I should probably put some similar verbiage at the top of my forum header. The combination of my own analysis and keeping up with all the other analysis and creating links is keeping me busy. |
|
Sep-23-10
| | kutztown46: After 10...Nh5
click for larger viewAnalysis by Stockfish 1.8 JA 64bit (31-ply):
1. ² (0.28): 11.cxd5 cxd5 12.Bc7 Qe8 13.Nc3 Ndf6 14.Nd2 Ba6 15.Bf3 Rc8 16.Be5 g6 17.g4 Ng7 18.Qb3 h5 19.h3 Nd7 20.Bf4 Nf6 21.Rac1 Qd7 22.a3 Nh7 23.e3 Ng5 24.Bg2 hxg4 25.hxg4 Rfd8 2. = (0.00): 11.Bd2 Nhf6
3. = (0.00): 11.Bc1 Nhf6 12.Nbd2 Bb7 13.e4 Rc8 14.e5 Ne8 15.Nb3 dxc4 16.Qxc4 Nc7 17.Qe2 Nd5 18.Qe4 c5 19.Qg4 Kh8 20.dxc5 bxc5 21.Bd2 N5b6 22.Re1 Bd5 23.Qh5 h6 24.Rac1 Nc4 25.Rc2 4. = (0.00): 11.Be3 Nhf6 12.Bf4
5. = (-0.20): 11.Nbd2 Nxf4 12.gxf4 Bb7 13.Rac1 Re8 14.e3 Rb8 15.Qb3 Rc8 16.Ne1 Nf8 17.Nd3 Ng6 18.Nf3 Ba6 19.cxd5 cxd5 20.Qa4 Rxc1 21.Nxc1 Qc8 22.Bf1 Bb7 23.Nd3 Qb8 24.Rc1 a6 6. = (-0.20): 11.Be5 Bb7 12.Nc3 Rc8 13.Rac1 g5 14.cxd5 cxd5 15.Qb3 g4 16.Ne1 f6 17.Bf4 Nxf4 18.gxf4 f5 19.Nd3 Rf7 20.Nb5 a6 21.Rxc8 Bxc8 22.Nc3 Bb7 23.Rc1 Bf8 24.Na4 Bh6 25.Nc3 Bg7 26.e3 |
|
| Sep-23-10 | | WinKing: Rybka 3 IDeA(Deep Analysis) looking at:
<10...Bb7 11.Ne5>
11...Nh5 12.Bd2 Nhf6 13.cxd5 cxd5 14.Nc6 Bxc6 15.Qxc6 Rc8 16.Qb5
Nb8 <17.Qd3> Nc6 18.Bc3 Rc7 19.Nd2 Qd7 20.a3 Rfc8 21.e3 h6 22.Rac1
Ne8 23.Rc2 Bf8 24.Rdc1 (+0.11 - Rybka 3 IDeA - Over 9000 positions looked at) 
click for larger view*****
11...Nh5 12.Bd2 Nhf6 13.cxd5 cxd5 14.Nc6 Bxc6 15.Qxc6 Rc8 16.Qb5
Nb8 <17.Nc3> a6 18.Qd3 b5 19.Rac1 Nc6 20.Bg5 Qa5 21.Bxf6 Bxf6 22.e4
b4 23.Ne2 Ne7 24.e5 Bg5 25.f4 Bh6 (+0.00 - Rybka 3 IDeA - Over 9000 positions looked at) 
click for larger view***** |
|
| Sep-23-10 | | goslinga: <kutztown has a variation with the 11. Nd2 line in "after 10. ...Bb7": Analysis by Stockfish 1.8 JA 64bit (30-ply):
1. = (0.00): 11. Nbd2 c5 12. cxd5 Nxd5 13. Ne4 cxd4 14. Nxd4 Rc8...
>
Instead of 13. ...cd4, Rybka recommends 13. ...Nxf4:
3.  (-0.22): 11. Nbd2 c5 12. cd5 Nxd5 13. Ne4 Nxf4 14. gf4 Qc7 15. dc5 bc5 Likewise, maybe somewhat better than 13. Ne4:
2. (-0.18): 11. Nbd2 c5 12. cd5 Nxd5 13. dc5 Rc8 14. Ne4/Be5
White's QB finally bites the dust and he gets a doubled f pawn, not a pleasant game for white. Best line sofar (Rybka):
1. = (0.0): 10. ...Bb7 11. Nbd2 c5 12. dxc5 Bxc5 13. cd5 Rc8 14. Qd3 Nxd5 15. Ne4 Be7 16. Qd2 N7f6 17. Nxf6+ Nxf6 18. Rac1 Qxd2 19. Bxd2 Rfd8 20. Rxc8 Rxc8 21. Nd4 Bd5 22. Bxd5 Nxd5 23. Rc1 Rxc1 24. Bxc1 Nb4 25. a3 Bf6 26. Nb5 Nc6 27. Kg2 My humble thoughts:
12. dc5 is the logical consequence of Rd1 since it opens the d-file for our rook although it helps black's development.
12. cd5 relieves the pressure on our c-pawn but it brings a black knight to d5 to harrass our queen's bishop. |
|
Sep-24-10
 | | Check It Out: 10…Bb7 11.b3 Rc8
12.Nc3 c5
13.e4 cxd4 14.exd5 dxc3 15.d6 Be4 16.Qxc3 Nd5 17.dxe7 Nxc3 18.exd8(Q) Rfxd8 19.Re1 Bd3 20.Be3 a5 21.Nd4 e5 (+0.28) 24/57 13.e4
13… cxd4 14.exd5 dxc3 15.d6 Be4 16.Qxc3 Nd5 17.dxe7 Nxc3 18.exd8(Q) Rfxd8 19.Re1 Nc5 20.Be5 Rd3 21.Re3 Rxe3 22.fxe3 Nb1 23.Nd4 Bxg2 24.Kxg2 Nd2 (+0.25) 26/62 13…Nh5 14. dxc5 Nxf4 15.gxf4 Rxc5 16.Qd2 Nf6 17.e5 Ng4 18.h3 Nh6 19.Nd4 Qc8 20.cxd5 Rxc3 21.d6 Bxg2 22.dxe7 Re8 23.Kxg2 Qb7+ 24.Kh2 Rc5 25.Rac1 (+0.17) 25/61 13…Nxe4 14.Nxe4 dxe4 15.Ne5 f6 16.Nxd7 Qxd7 17.dxc5 Qc6 18.cxb6 axb6 19.Rd4 f5 20.Rad1 Rfd8 21.Rxd8+ Rxd8 22.Rxd8+ Bxd8 23.a4 Bf6 24.Be3 Qd6 25.c5 bxc5 26.Bxc5 (+0.26) 25/67 |
|
Sep-24-10
| | kutztown46: After 10...h6
click for larger viewAnalysis by Stockfish 1.8 JA 64bit (29-ply):
1. ² (0.40): 11.Ne5 Bb7 12.Nc3 g5 13.cxd5 cxd5 14.Be3 Re8 15.Rac1 Rc8 16.Qb3 Bd6 17.Nb5 Rxc1 18.Rxc1 Bxe5 19.dxe5 Nxe5 20.Qa3 Nfg4 21.Bd4 Nc6 22.h3 Nge5 23.Bxe5 Nxe5 24.Qxa7 Re7 25.Nd4 Bc6 26.Qa3 Bb7 2. = (0.24): 11.Nc3 dxc4 12.Nd2 Nd5 13.Nxc4 Nxf4 14.gxf4 Qc7 15.e3 Ba6 16.Ne5 Nxe5 17.fxe5 Rac8 18.Rac1 Rfd8 3. = (0.00): 11.Nbd2 g5 12.Be3 Ng4 13.Nf1 Ba6 14.h3 Nxe3 15.Nxe3 Rc8 16.Rd2 Bb4 17.Rdd1 Be7 4. = (0.00): 11.cxd5 cxd5 12.Ne5 Bb7 13.Nc6 Bxc6 14.Qxc6 a6 15.Rc1 g5 16.Bc7 Qc8 17.a4 Ra7 18.a5 bxa5 19.Qc2 Bb4 20.Bxa5 Qxc2 21.Rxc2 Rb7 22.Nd2 Rfb8 23.b3 Bxd2 24.Bxd2 Rxb3 25.Rxa6 Rb2 26.Rac6 Rxc2 5. = (0.00): 11.a3 Bb7 12.Nc3 Nh5 13.Bd2 Nhf6 14.Bf4 6. = (-0.08): 11.Rc1 Bb7 12.cxd5 Nxd5 13.Rd1 Nxf4 14.gxf4 Qc8 15.Nc3 Rd8 16.Ne5 c5 17.Bxb7 Qxb7 18.Nxd7 Rxd7 19.dxc5 Bxc5 20.Rxd7 Qxd7 21.Rd1 Qc7 22.e3 Rd8 23.Rxd8+ Qxd8 24.Ne4 Be7 25.Qa4 f5 26.Ng3 Bf6 |
|
| Sep-24-10 | | thegoodanarchist: Sorry, but I have not had time to sandpaper recently: 10….Ba6 11.Nbd2:
Inferior replies for Black
11…c5 12.dxc5 Bxc5 13.Qa4 Bb7 14.cxd5 Nxd5 15.Nb3 a6 16.Bg5 f6 17.Bd2 Qe7 18.Rac1 Rfc8 19.Nxc5 Nxc5 20.Qh4 a5 21.a3 g5 +0.32 24/60 11…h6 12.e4 Nxe4 13.Nxe4 dxe4 15.Ne5 Nxe5 15.dxe5 Qc7 16.Qxe4 Bb7 17.Be3 Rfd8 18.b3 Rab8 19.Qg4 Rbc8 20.f4 Bb4 21.Qf3 Rxd1+ 22.Rxd1 Rb8 +0.26 24/64 11...Rc8 and 11...Nh5 seem to be better. |
|
Sep-24-10
| | Check It Out: <kutztown46> I'm running Shredder 12. I'm sandpapering the lines I posted above now, going back to 11...Rc8. Shredder 12 really likes 12.Nc3 here. Other options include 12.Ne1 and 12.a4, but both are in neg evals for white, and both look weird to my human eyes. So, In response to 10...Bb7 11.b3 Rc8
12.Nc3 looks like the best move.
Will keep working on these variations.
If there is a better way for me to present this work, let me know! |
|
| Sep-24-10 | | lost in space: Hi Kutz,
and what to play now here?
Do we have a summary? |
|
 |
|
|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 60 OF 91 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
Kibitzing
A majority vote for 1-0 means we resign. 