chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
 
Chessgames.com User Profile Chessforum

offramp
Member since Aug-16-03 · Last seen Jan-08-26
Some chess books that I think are outstanding:

1. <Fundamental Chess Endgames>, by Müller & Lamprecht, reprinted 2020. 400pp+, £25.

2. <Secrets of Practical Chess>, by Dr Nunn. 256pp (the USUAL 256pp!, i.e. the usual 2^8). £20.

3. <Capablanca's Best Chess Endings>, Irving Chernev's best work. 300pp. £15.

4. <107 Great Chess Battles 1939-1945>, written by Alexander Alekhine, but edited by Edward Winter. 256pp, £15.

5 (a) <Petrosian Year by Year Volume 1 (1942-1962)>, and - Karolyi & Gyozalyan, 484pp.
(b) <Petrosian Year by Year Volume 2 (1963-1984)> - Karolyi & Gyozalyan, 516pp.
They are £34 each. I bought one, then a few months later, the other volume.
They are available in Kindle format!

6. <The Queen's Gambit Accepted: A Sharp and Sound Response to 1. d4> by Chris Ward.
Ward wrote a superb book about the QGD, many years ago. I think this is useful for a book about the QGA. A total antidote to 1. d4, 2. c4.

And now some total clinkers. NOT those well-known garbage chess books.

The following are really bad chess books.

1. <Capablanca: A Compendium of Games, Notes, Articles, Correspondence, Illustrations and Other Rare Archival Materials on the Cuban Chess Genius Jose Raul Capablanca, 1888-1942> by Edward Winter. 360pp. c. £35. The title is the best thing.

2. <Larsen: Move by Move> - Cyrus Lakdawala
Paperback, 488pp.

3. <Emanuel Lasker Volumes 1, 2 & 3 - Forster, Negele & Tischbierek>. £55 each.
This book is unbelievably boring and tedious. Just look through it, then forget about it.
AT THIS SAME TIME a totally superb book has just come out: <Emanuel Lasker All Games Volume 1 & 2: 1889-1940 (2 books)>, £55 for two books:
Volume 1 covers the time Lasker became World Champion and played matches against Steinitz (twice for the World Championship), Bird and Blackburne amongst others. He also took part several famous tournaments including Hastings 1895, St Petersburg 1895-96 and Nuremberg 1896.

Volume 2 covers the time Lasker played matches against Marshall, Tarrasch, Janowski, Schlechter and Capablanca for the World Championship. He also took part several famous tournaments including St Petersburg 1914, New York 1924, Moscow 1935 & 1936 and Nottingham 1936.

Hardbacks, 388 and 342 pages, Russian Chess House. A real bargain.

4. <Pal Benko : My Life, Games and Compositions>, £140. Who is the most famous chess player out of Benko and Fischer? Who published the most plush, most opulent book? Benko.

.....
Here are another 7 books:

<He received a letter from his bookseller, informing him that only seven copies had been sold, and concluding with a polite request for the balance.
Scythrop <[SKI-throp]> did not despair. <Seven copies,> he thought, <have been sold. Seven is a mystical number, and the omen is good. Let me find the seven purchasers of my seven copies, and they shall be the seven golden candlesticks with which I will illuminate the world.>.>

>> Click here to see offramp's game collections.

Chessgames.com Full Member
   Current net-worth: 1,436 chessbucks
[what is this?]

   offramp has kibitzed 25153 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Jan-08-26 P Wells vs K Hanache, 2025
 
offramp: I've been pondering about this game. <Are you pondering what I am pondering?> (Brain & Pinky.) The whole game is interesting, right from the start. E.g., Black was 13. Wells was 60. Wells played in the traditional English weekend circuit style. That style includes Kim ...
 
   Jan-08-26 Tata Steel India Rapid (2026)
 
offramp: Good old Niemann. He is a globe-trotter. I have seen his suitcase. It is pretty small, and it is covered in stickers: <London>, <Tashkent>, <Beijing> and many others. Now he is in <Kolktata>. My Indian friend told me that Niemann was a bit <funky>. And ...
 
   Jan-08-26 G Reichhelm vs Mackenzie, 1867
 
offramp: The powerful Evans Gambit might resurface in the 2030s. Many players might get fed up with the Joko Piano. I don't know the Evans. I don't know how far the theory goes down. In that era they played 1000s of the Evans. Oh blimey! 19. Nfd5. [DIAGRAM] There was available to Black a
 
   Jan-08-26 G Reichhelm vs Mackenzie, 1867
 
offramp: This was similar to the first game: both players were happy to accept every exchange. 16. Rxc3. [DIAGRAM] Now plays very well. It's interesting to see that Black did <not> give a <luft> square for the black king until he <had> to do it. 22...g6. [DIAGRAM] ...
 
   Jan-08-26 Mackenzie vs G Reichhelm, 1867
 
offramp: Both sides accepted all exchanges. When we get to 16...Qe7... [DIAGRAM] ...In the 21st century we would say that White has a bad pawn formation. White ( George Mackenzie ) carries on. It is very interesting. Here is the best move: 22...Rd6. [DIAGRAM] 23. Rff6! <Black: ...
 
   Jan-07-26 K Piorun vs I Gorshtein, 2025 (replies)
 
offramp: White played the opening in an old-fashioned style. When I mean "old-fashioned" I mean "about a 1,000 years old". There is a book on this opening by <Al-Adli> written in c. 890BC. [DIAGRAM] This is about 10 moves later. [DIAGRAM] Time for a bit of a <zhuzh> in your ...
 
   Jan-06-26 Indjic vs J Vakhidov, 2025
 
offramp: White was in a tight spot. [DIAGRAM] 19. f3!+-
 
   Jan-06-26 Gledura vs A Suleymanli, 2025
 
offramp: We all know this position. 16. Qe2. [DIAGRAM] The gun is cocked! We know what to do. Tarrasch knew, Lasker knew. Bust open the centre and give up two ♝ ♝! The trouble is that we are in the twentieth century. ⋆༺𓆩☠︎︎𓆪༻⋆ After some developing, White ...
 
   Jan-06-26 Bluebaum vs L Livaic, 2025
 
offramp: W: 2687, B: 2551. These are big ratings! 20...Nd5. [DIAGRAM] The ♞ at d5 looks powerful. It looks that it is going to control the whole of the centre. 21. Rxd5! Black is in immediate danger. 21...Bd5 22. Bg5! [DIAGRAM] 22...e5 23. Nxe5. That is really annoying...You ...
 
   Jan-06-26 M Boyer vs V Ivic, 2025
 
offramp: An interesting ending. I bet you won't guess what happens. 37. Kh4. [DIAGRAM] I think Mahel Boyer was hoping for a checkmate, with Kg5, Raa8+. However, after 37. Kh4 Black <could> have played the devastating .... 37...g5+!!-+ [DIAGRAM] In the game there is the same ...
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

Ye Olde Offrampe Predicktions

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 7 OF 86 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jan-05-08  timhortons: <offramp>i just read about your rjf claims...anyways nice pic in youre site
Jan-28-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: I was watching the extraordinary Australian Open men's semi-final, where someone in the crowd was holding a home-made paper banner, which was clearly intended to say "GO NADAL" but the end of the banner had curled up so that the last two letters were missing. Well, it is a ball sport.
Apr-09-08  freeman8201: Hello offramp
did you get my kibitzing earlier?
I had ask you if you know that botvinik play composed games? I do not want to study him if it is true. I ask cause the game between he and checkover might have been composed because Mikhail botvinik never annoted the game untill chekover died.
Nov-18-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: In that green going
A wave interminably flowing.
Nov-18-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: I've just made my 6,666th post. Very Crowleyan.
Nov-19-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: 1.e4 4.4 e5 2.5 2.Nf3 2.4 Nc6 2.4 3.d4 5.1 exd4 3.3 4.c3 1.8 d3 6.6 5.Bxd3 6.7 Be7 2.8 6.0-0 2.8 d6 4.8 7.Re1 4.9 Ne5 1.9 8.Bf4 8.6 Ng6 6.4 9.Bg3 2.2 Nf6 1.5 10.e5 13 dxe5 2.5 11.Nxe5 2.8 Nxe5 2.5 12.Rxe5 6.2 0-0 1.9 13.Qe2 38 Re8 8.8 14.Bc4 13 Bd6 32 15.Rxe8+ 18 Qxe8 1.7 16.Qxe8+ 3.1 Nxe8 2 17.Nd2 2.5 Nf6 12 18.Nf3 6.2 h6 3.8 19.Rd1 6.3 Bxg3 2.8 20.hxg3 2.6 Bg4 2.9 21.Kf1 9.7 Kf8 3.2 22.Rd4 5.9 Bxf3 3 23.gxf3 2.4 Ke7 7.9 24.Ke2 9.9 b6 20 25.Kd2 8 c5 10 26.Rd3 8.6 Rb8 35 27.a4 1:40 Rb7 10 28.Bd5 9.2 Rd7 29 29.Be4 3 Rxd3+ 8.5 30.Kxd3 4.8 Kd6 48 31.Bf5 36 Nd7 25 32.Kc4 5.1 Ne5+ 21 33.Kb5 20 Kc7 18 34.Be4 8 a5 38 35.Ka6 15 Nc4 18 36.b3 3.3 Nd2 5.3 37.Bd5 6.6 f6 12 38.f4 13 g5 34 39.fxg5 3.3 fxg5 5.4 40.Kb5 14 h5 4.4 41.f4 22 Kd6 59 42.Bg2 21 gxf4 31 43.gxf4 2.6 Ke6 38 44.Kxb6 7.4 Nxb3 2.8 45.c4 23 Kf5 2.8 46.Bf3 26 h4 2.6 47.Bd1 3.1 Nd2 12 48.Kxc5 9.9 h3 1.7 49.Bc2+ 27 Kxf4 8.8 50.Kd5 42 h2 5.8

I was white and probably carried on too long. Well played by black.

Nov-19-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: Nightfall; the fatal eggs.
Dec-01-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: 1.e4
This encounter provoked a great deal of competitive and analytical interest among chess players. Competitive, because this was my third successive victory over the American grandmaster, and in terms of number of moves the game was barely beyond the bounds of a miniature. It was of a certain significance for theory, and the incredible tension in a position, where everything was decided by one tempo, provoked numerous analytical works. It was only several years later that the analysts, having refuted and corrected one another, came to a unanimous conclusion. And although immediately after the game it seemed to me to be complete and consistent, it later had to be included among those played according to the principle of "two on the swing". Personally this gives me less satisfaction, but the wealth of possibilities in the positions arising was so great, and the oscillation amplitude from win to loss so small and imperceptible, that this game is undoubtedly one of my most memorable. As a point of information, I should also like to point out that Black, in spite of his "love" for time trouble, spent on the twenty-two moves of this highly complex encounter less than an hour and a half. The time spent by White was greater .... ..c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 Nc6 6.Bc4
[It is possible that the Rauzer Attack 6.Bg5 is more dangerous for Black, but the Sozin Attack, which commences with this move, is Fischer's childhood love. I have several times managed to find means of active counter-play against it. In general, when playing the American grandmaster, it was best to aim for positions with chances for both sides. It should be mentioned that, after his failure in the present game and against Larsen (I nterzonal Tournament, Palma de Mallorca, 1970) where Fischer also chose 0-0-0, he reverted to his former set-up with K-side castling in his match with Spassky. I have already mentioned this in my notes to Game No. 96. But after the fourth game of the match Fischer did not play the Sozin Attack again.] ..e6 7.Be3


click for larger view

In his notes to this move in his book <My 60 Memorable Games>, Fischer writes that <Bb3 cuts down Black's options>, and cites mainly Fischer vs P Dely, 1967. I think that 7 Bb3 is a double-edged weapon, since it also cuts down White's options. For example, in the variation with Q-side castling Black has constantly to reckon with the fact that White has not wasted a tempo on the retreat of his bishop. Thus in Velimirovic vs Geller, 1973, Dragoljub Velimirovic after 7 Be3 Be7 8 Qe2 Nxd4 9 Bxd4 0--0 10 0-0-0 Qa5 continued 11 e5 dxe5 12 Bxe5, with interesting play. So that, if he is planning 0-0-0, White is not obliged to hurry over moving his bishop to b3.

Dec-01-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: 7...Be7
<Too routine>, writes Fischer. <Black should start quicker action on the Q-side. More reasonable is 7 ... a6 8 Bb3 Qc7 9 Qe2 (or 9 f4) 9 ... b5 10 0-0-0 Na5 (10 ... Bb7 is also possible, whereupon White might reply 11 f3).> In the Sozin Attack, move order is very important for both sides, since any transposition gives both White, and Black, a wide choice of continuations. From Fischer's commentary it is seen that he himself is not altogether sure whether in the proposed variation White should play 9 Qe2 or 9 f4, since in the latter case the recommended 11 f3 is no longer possible. Moreover, after 7 ... a6 8 Bb3 Qc7 9 f4 b5 Black has to reckon with the immediate 10 f5 b4 11 fxe6. So that at present it is hardly possible to give any categorical directions in the given position. Bb3 0-0 9.Qe2
White retains the choice on the following move of the side on which to castle. ..Qa5
Here too Black is not obliged to play an early ... a6. In the game Tal vs Julio Bolbochan, 1966 after 9 ... a6? 10 0--0-0 Qa5 White could have set his opponent a number of difficult problems by 11 Rhg1! with the idea of g2-g4-g5 .


click for larger view

10.0-0-0 Nxd4 11.Bxd4 Bd7 12.Kb1 Bc6 13.f4 Rad8 14.Rhf1 [14.g4 Kholmov 14...e5 (14...d5 15.exd5 Nxd5 16.Nxd5 Bxd5 17.Bc3 Qc5 18.Bxd5 Rxd5 19.Rxd5 Qxd5 20.Qd1 Qc5 21.f5 exf5 22.gxf5) 15.fxe5 dxe5 16.Bf2 Rxd1+ 17.Rxd1 Rd8 18.Rf1; 14.f5 exf5(14...e5 15.Bf2 d5? 16.exd5 Nxd5 17.Nxd5 Bxd5 18.Qxe5) 15.exf5 Rfe8 16.Qf2] ..b5 15.f5 b4 16.fxe6
[16.Nd5 exd5 17.exd5 Nxd5 18.Bxd5 Bxd5 19.Qxe7 Qxa2+ 20.Kc1 Rc8 21.Qxa7 (21.Bxg7 Bb3! etc) 21...Qc4 22.Rf2 Be4 23.Rdd2 b3] ..bxc3 17.exf7+
[17.Rxf6 Bxf6 more tenacious (17...gxf6 18.exf7+ (18.Qg4+ Qg5! 19.exf7+ Rxf7 20.Qe6 Rdf8 21.Qxe7 Qd2!!) 18...Kh8 19.Qg4 Rb8 20.Qe6 Qd8 21.Rf1 Rb4 22.Bxc3 Rxe4 23.Rxf6 Re1+ 24.Bxe1 Bxf6 25.Ba5!!) 18.Bxf6 gxf6 19.e7 Qe5 20.exd8Q Rxd8 21.Qc4 Be8 22.Qxc3] ..Kh8 18.Rf5 Qb4 19.Qf1
[19.bxc3 Qb7; 19.Bxc3 Qxe4; 19.Rxf6 Bxf6 20.Bxf6 gxf6 21.Qf2 Rxf7] 19...Nxe4 [19...Ng4 20.Bxc3 Qb7 (20...Qxe4 21.Rd4) 21.Rh5 Bxe4 (21...Ne5 22.Qf5 h6 23.Qg6!) 22.Bd5 Bxd5 (22...Bxc2+ 23.Kxc2 Ne3+ 24.Kd3 Qxd5+ 25.Rxd5 Nxf1 26.Rxf1 and 26...Bf6 fails to 27.Rxf6) 23.Qf5 h6 24.Rxd5 Nf6 25.Bxf6 Bxf6 26.Rxh6+ gxh6 27.Qxf6+ Kh7 28.Rh5] 20.a3 [20.Qf4 cxb2 a) 20...Nd2+ 21.Rxd2 cxd2 22.c3!! Qb7 a1) 22...Qxb3 23.Bxg7+ Kxg7 24.Qg4+ Kh8 25.Qd4+ Bf6 26.Qxf6#; a2) 22...Qc5 23.Kc2! Bd7 (23...Qe5 24.Rxe5 dxe5 25.Qxe5 Bf6 26.Qc5 (26.Qxf6? d1Q+!) 26...Bxd4 27.cxd4 Rc8 28.Kxd2 Ba4 29.Qe7 Bxb3 30.axb3 Rcd8 31.Ke3) 24.Bxc5 Bxf5+ 25.Qxf5 dxc5 26.Kd1 Rd6 27.Qe5 Rd7 28.Qe6 Rb7 29.Bc2 -- 30.Qf5; 23.Bxg7+ Kxg7 24.Qg4+ Kh8 25.Qd4+ Bf6 26.Qxf6#; b) 20...d5 21.Qe5 Nf6 22.Rxf6 Bxf6 23.Qxf6!; 21.Rh5 Nf6 a) 21...Nc3+ 22.Kxb2 Nxd1+ (22...Rxf7 23.Qxf7 Nxd1+ 24.Kb1!! Qxd4 25.Rxh7+ Kxh7 26.Qh5#) 23.Kc1 Rxf7 (23...-- 24.Bxg7+ Kxg7 25.Qh6+ Kh8 26.Qxh7#) 24.Bxf7 -- 25.Rxh7+ Kxh7 26.Qf5+ Kh6 27.Qh5#; b) 21...Bf6 22.Qf5 h6 23.Rxh6+!! gxh6 24.Qg6; 22.Rh6 d5 23.Rxf6 Rd6 24.Rxd6 Qxd6 25.Qxd6 Bxd6 26.Rf1] 20...Qb7 21.Qf4 Ba4 22.Qg4 Bf6 23.Rxf6 Bxb3 0-1

Jun-03-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: ¬¬¬¬¬¬

SUBJECT I.

<MOOT>.

I don't know what causes the problems with the word moot.

Here are some recent examples:
<Out of curiosity, how does the Petroff fare in your CC database? Is it employed at the highest levels? The question is probably <moot> because I doubt our distinguished opponent would want to be seen as unsportsmanlike....>

<It's a moot point though, as Black can force a perpetual earlier by playing 43...e3 instead.>

Both these examples the writer seems to think the meaning of moot is "irrelevant".

So what does moot mean?

A dictionary helps out, Chambers.

moot
verb (mooted, mooting)
1 to suggest; to bring something up for discussion.
2 intrans to dispute or plead, especially as a form of academic exercise. <adj (mooter, mootest) open to argument; debatable • a moot point.> noun 1 historical in Anglo-Saxon England: a court or administrative assembly. 2 a discussion of a hypothetical legal case, especially as a form of academic exercise. ETYMOLOGY: Anglo-Saxon as mot assembly.

A moot point is a point up for discussion.

I think people get confused in their heads between moot and mute, as in unstated.

Moots are still held in Britain; long discussions about difficult theological ideas.

Jun-03-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: <Both lines win handily, so it's a bit of a moot point!>

No it's not!

<However, since the game theoretical value is not known for chess, with or without knight odds, the whole discussion is rendered moot.>

No! How can it be?

And now look at this one:
Lasker - Janowski (1909) <May-30-14 ughaibu: ... Reti too, might moot from beyond the grave, his right to speculate. I'm not a lawyer, but I'd prefer evidence a little harder.>

Well done, <ughaibu>! One of the few who understands the meaning of the words that he uses.

Jun-19-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: I've been predicting results quite well for this World Soccerball Cup. I had a strong feeling that Chilé was going to beat Spain, but I said they'd win 2-1.

I cannot see England beating Uruguay. But England might manage a draw. I'd say 1-1. England I think would beat whoever the other team is. Is it Costa Rica?

Jun-19-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: I almost never drink alcoholic sppirits. But recently I read about a gimlet. This is quite a large shot of Robinson's Lime Cordial and some gin. It's very nice. I only tried it because Philip Marlowe apparently drinks two of them in the course of Chandler's novels.

Marlowe insists it <must> be Robinson's.

Jun-19-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: Not Robinson's, Rose's:

<Chandler’s formula of 1/2 gin and 1/2 Rose’s seems pretty steep, since a gimlet is basically a martini with Rose’s Lime Juice rather than vermouth. The 1954 Esquire’s Handbook for Hosts, published in London the year after The Long Goodbye, cites the Savoy Hotel’s recipe of 3 parts gin to 1 part Rose’s. Esquire also notes, “A true Gimlet must be made with Rose’s bottled lime juice, which vanished like nylons during the war but is now seen around again.”>

In any case I used Asda own brand. That was about 60p a bottle. I am having some lime juice right now with fizzy water! Fantastic!

Jun-19-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: 1,000,000 Years BC is on the telly. What is that in Roman numerals?
Jun-19-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: I've never understood how Raquel didn't get an Oscar for that movie.
Jun-19-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: I used to write to this beautiful Ukrainian girl. I called her my chick in Kiev.
Jun-19-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: Mmm. Raquel Welch. She should have done more Hammer films.
Jun-19-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: I'm supposed to avoid salt so all my muscles are Charley-horsing.
Jun-20-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: England lost again yesterday. A total inability to score goals has plagued English teams in these last World Cups.

In the last WC, in 2010, England scored 3 goals in 4 games. So now it is 5 goals in the last 6 games. Other teams like Holland and Croatia are knocking goals in all the time.

Jun-20-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: Here's a good comment:

<all hail tal: Strange that the article says Tal crushed Polu in Riga but the record of +2-8=24 doesn't jive with that.>

The correct word, another rare one that I never use, is <jibe>. An it be a sailing term.

Jun-20-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: WHO v WHOM

This is simple: never use <whom> unless you are absolutely 100% certain that it is the correct word. I stopped using it years ago; I use who for everything and I don't think I have ever been wrong.

Jun-20-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: I have just recently been re-reading User: LIFE Master AJ's review of the biography of Amos Burn; his review can be read in full at Amos Burn.

I had my own opinions about this book, which I posted on the Amos Burn page:

<I have seen Richard Forster's book on Amos Burn but there is no way I would ever buy it. It is almost as directionless and futile a waste of resources and brainpower as the autobiography of Pal Benko.

All Amos Burn needed was a 32-page A5-sized home-printed smudgy crappy-diagrammed buck and a half paperback, on yellow paper that looks like toilet paper. Nothing more.>

And I'm sticking with that!

Jun-20-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: Chessnotes <5127. Abrahams and Alekhine

‘Be more considerate to small boys.’ That request was made to Alekhine by Gerald Abrahams in 1936, as related on pages 135-136 of his book Not Only Chess (London, 1974).

At a simultaneous display in Liverpool in autumn 1923 Abrahams, then aged 16, was the last surviving player:

‘And there was Alekhine, standing over the board, insisting on instantaneous replies. He thought, then made his move, rapped sharply on the table and made impatient sounds in Russian.

The position was hard. Pawns wedged with pawns, and my king bishop and knight, endeavouring to be on guard at all moments against his king, and two fantastically wheeling knights. After 12 lightning moves under these conditions the boy went wrong, found a pawn indefensible, and resigned. The grandmaster swept the pieces aside brusquely, and stalked away. He was, let me emphasize, entirely within his rights.’

After describing how differently Capablanca later behaved towards him in similar circumstances, Abrahams related that at Nottingham in 1936 Alekhine’s wife (‘a delightful American lady’) required assistance with a visa renewal.

‘Alekhine asked me to oblige, and I gladly did so. He said, “If I can ever do anything for you, please ask me.” I replied, “You can do something for me.” He raised an interrogative eyebrow. I said, “Be more considerate to small boys.” The frozen blue eyes stared at me for some seconds. “Yes”, he said, I remember, Liverpool 1923. You had pawns, bishop and knight against my pawns and two knights. You should have drawn that game.”’

Although Abrahams stated that Alekhine faced 60 opponents, the master’s score given on page 403 of the November 1923 BCM and page 197 of the Skinner/Verhoeven book on Alekhine was +24 –1 =6. The exhibition took place on 29 September 1923.>

That is a fascinating story.
Here are the parts I find very interesting:
<At a simultaneous display in Liverpool in autumn 1923 Abrahams, then aged 16, was the last surviving player:

‘And there was Alekhine, standing over the board, insisting on instantaneous replies. He thought, then made his move, rapped sharply on the table and made impatient sounds in Russian.

The position was hard. Pawns wedged with pawns, and my king bishop and knight, endeavouring to be on guard at all moments against his king, and two fantastically wheeling knights. After 12 lightning moves under these conditions the boy went wrong, found a pawn indefensible, and resigned. The grandmaster swept the pieces aside brusquely, and stalked away. He was, let me emphasize, entirely within his rights.’>

So that was on 29th September 1923.
Then, 13 years later, at Nottingham, 1936, Alekhine says: <[The frozen blue eyes stared at me for some seconds.] “Yes”, he said, I remember, Liverpool 1923. You had pawns, bishop and knight against my pawns and two knights. You should have drawn that game.”’>

Really? I can actually believe it of Alekhine. I think he had a phenomenal memory.

Jun-22-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: ¬¬¬

ANNOUNCER: Roma Wines present...

MAN IN BLACK: Suspense!

MUSIC: THEME ESTABLISHES, THEN OUT.

ANNOUNCER: Roma Wines. Made in California
for Enjoyment Throughout the
World.

SFX: GLASS CLINK.

“SALUD!” MAN: Salud!

“YOUR HEALTH, Your health, Señor!
SEÑOR!” MAN:

SFX: GLASS CLINK.

ANNOUNCER: Roma Wines toast the world. The
wine for your table is Roma
Wine. Made in California for
Enjoyment Throughout the World.

MUSIC: THEME. TRIPLETS START, FADE
UNDER.

MAN IN BLACK: This is the Man in Black, here
to introduce this weekly half
hour of... Suspense! Tonight
from Hollywood we bring you Mr.
Orson Welles. Mr. Welles will
appear as star of the Suspense
drama called “The Dark Tower”,
from the play by George S.
Kaufman and the late Alexander
Woollcott. But before we raise
the curtain on this evening's
tale of Suspense, here is a
message from your host, the Roma
Wine Company of Fresno,
California.

MUSIC: OUT.

ANNOUNCER: Let us picture a scene in the
fashionable restaurant El Patio
in Havana, Cuba. From the next
table, we hear a Cuban judge of
fine wine describe in glowing
terms the wonderful climate and
soil of our own California.
When his American guest points
out that his Cuban host has
never been to the United States,
the Cuban answers, "Well, it's
true I've never visited your
California, but from only such
perfect wine country could come
sherry of such superb quality
that we have enjoyed. Roma
California Sherry!"

Yes, by their examples, wine
connoisseurs of many other lands
tell you that in Roma Wines are
all the great qualities that
must be present in a wine for
great enjoyment. It's for this
reason that wine experts of
other lands import Roma Wines
from great distances, to be
enjoyed as a rare luxury. But
for you, this luxury of other
lands becomes a daily pleasure.
Because you can enjoy any of
Roma Wines' taste appealing wine
types without additional charge
for import duties, and expense
shipment from great distance.
These two great Roma Wine
features, superb quality and
small cost, have made Roma Wines
America's largest selling wines.
I'll spell out the name for you.
R. O. M. A. Roma Wines! Made
in California for enjoyment
throughout the world.

ANNOUNCER: (CONT’D) It is a significant
fact that when lovers of truly
fine food gather in many a far
corner of the world, there you
may well find Roma Wines lending
their subtle magic to the
greater enjoyment of living.
They furnish a Gracious Prelude
to any meal. A flavor-
complementing delight during the
meal, and even at desert time,
too. For Truly, the Exquisite
Flavor of Roma California Wines,
used in cooking and also served
with the food, can make even the
Simplest Everyday Meal the
Simplest Entertaining. A
Special Occasion treat.
Discover for yourself how much
Far Famed Roma Wines can add to
your meals. And delight your
friends when you entertain.
Remember: Roma Wines are almost
Unbelievably Inexpensive for
wines of such Distinguished
Character. Only pennies a
glassful. Ask for R. O. M. A.
Roma Wines. America's Largest
Selling Wines. Made in
California for Enjoyment
Throughout the World.

MAN IN BLACK: Next Thursday, same time, you
will hear Lucille Ball in...

MUSIC: STING.

MAN IN BLACK: (CONT’D) Suspense!

ANNOUNCER: Presented by Roma Wines. R. O.
M. A. Made in California for
Enjoyment Throughout the World.

Jump to page #   (enter # from 1 to 86)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 7 OF 86 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific user only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Participating Grandmasters are Not Allowed Here!

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
   
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC