chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Wilhelm Steinitz vs Adolf Anderssen
Anderssen - Steinitz (1866), London ENG, rd 8, Jul-30
King's Gambit: Accepted. Salvio Gambit (C37)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 28 times; par: 23 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 21 more Steinitz/Anderssen games
sac: 20...Nc5 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Some people don't like to know the result of the game in advance. This can be done by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page, then checking "Don't show game results".

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Feb-28-03  ughaibu: Here's Steinitz again demonstrating modern style against Anderssen's barbarism.
Mar-01-03
Premium Chessgames Member
  lostemperor: A unofficial worldchampionshipmatch 8-6 with no draws. That must clearly be a form of barbarism! Quite a game.
Mar-01-03  Xpert of the game: What are you talking about?

Anderssen has won this match!!! Not Steinitz!!!

Mar-01-03  ChessPraxis: <to ughaibu> Your comment was meant ironically, I take it? At this stage in his career, Steinitz was trying his best to play like Morphy. I think his nickname was actually "the Austrian Morphy".

<to Xpert> Steinitz lost this game but won the match.

Mar-01-03  ughaibu: ChessPraxis: Yes, I was attempting irony. I dont know the details of when Steinitz changed from the Austrian Morphy to the "man who took the fun out of chess", I was responding to a comment on another game between these two.
Mar-02-03
Premium Chessgames Member
  lostemperor: I got the picture ugh! Well I was just commenting (actually an example of W.Hartston ) on the styledifference in that one particular game (and rightly so).

<Xpert of the game>, I also dont know that much about chess history , but to put 6 exclamation marks for something that is not true, is at least Xaggeration.

Mar-08-03  bentengutama: both look not hungry
Sep-05-03  fred lennox: This match demonstrates Anderssen's fighting spirit. He won the first game and lost the next four. Exact thing happend with the Morphy match. With this in his memory and knowing desparate attempts to gain lost gound is usually disaster, he won the next four, Steinitz the next two. After this game the score became 6-6.
Sep-05-03  ughaibu: Anderssen's approach was beyond the triviality of match points.
Jan-13-05  aw1988: <Anderssen has won this match!!! Not Steinitz!!!> Actually, Anderssen won the game, but Steinitz won the match.
Jul-18-07  ALEXIN: 21. Qh6 threating penetration in white position via d2 is really a powerful move.
Jul-18-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  lilfoohk: Playing King's gambit aganist an expert of King's gambit , Steinitz is really brave.I thought he would have chosen some quiet lines
Jan-12-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  heuristic: mo' better moves:

16.Bxd6 cxd6 17.Nc7+ Kd8 18.Nxa8 b6

Jan-31-12  Knight13: <lilfoohk: Playing King's gambit aganist an expert of King's gambit , Steinitz is really brave.I thought he would have chosen some quiet lines> I believe "bold" is a more accurate word.

<ALEXIN: 21. Qh6 threating penetration in white position via d2 is really a powerful move.> That move deserves an exclamation mark. 22. h4 is the correct move.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
24 moves
from Chess Miniatures, Collection VII by wwall
22.Bd3 and more...
from World Championships Blunders by amadeus
Adolf Anderssen: +16, -16, =1
from Steinitz' Rare Defeats. by nikolaas
King's Gambit: Accepted. Salvio Gambit (C37) 0-1 It's mate in 1
from yCheckmate # Fredthebear Mating Patterns by fredthebear
2nd rank intrusion by black
from xKing's Gambit attacks Compiled by Calar by fredthebear
Match Anderssen!
by chessgain
miniatures
by maheshml
Match Steinitz!
by amadeus
The Hardest Wins
by crwynn
0 Anderssen-Steinitz 8
from World Championship Matches by Tobias
World champions lose miniatures 1.
by ughaibu


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2018, Chessgames Services LLC