chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Wilhelm Steinitz vs Adolf Anderssen
Anderssen - Steinitz (1866), London ENG, rd 8, Jul-30
King's Gambit: Accepted. Salvio Gambit (C37)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 30 times; par: 23 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 21 more Steinitz/Anderssen games
sac: 20...Nc5 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Premium members can see a list of all games that they have seen recently at their Game History Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Feb-28-03  ughaibu: Here's Steinitz again demonstrating modern style against Anderssen's barbarism.
Mar-01-03
Premium Chessgames Member
  lostemperor: A unofficial worldchampionshipmatch 8-6 with no draws. That must clearly be a form of barbarism! Quite a game.
Mar-01-03  Xpert of the game: What are you talking about?

Anderssen has won this match!!! Not Steinitz!!!

Mar-01-03  ChessPraxis: <to ughaibu> Your comment was meant ironically, I take it? At this stage in his career, Steinitz was trying his best to play like Morphy. I think his nickname was actually "the Austrian Morphy".

<to Xpert> Steinitz lost this game but won the match.

Mar-01-03  ughaibu: ChessPraxis: Yes, I was attempting irony. I dont know the details of when Steinitz changed from the Austrian Morphy to the "man who took the fun out of chess", I was responding to a comment on another game between these two.
Mar-02-03
Premium Chessgames Member
  lostemperor: I got the picture ugh! Well I was just commenting (actually an example of W.Hartston ) on the styledifference in that one particular game (and rightly so).

<Xpert of the game>, I also dont know that much about chess history , but to put 6 exclamation marks for something that is not true, is at least Xaggeration.

Mar-08-03  bentengutama: both look not hungry
Sep-05-03  fred lennox: This match demonstrates Anderssen's fighting spirit. He won the first game and lost the next four. Exact thing happend with the Morphy match. With this in his memory and knowing desparate attempts to gain lost gound is usually disaster, he won the next four, Steinitz the next two. After this game the score became 6-6.
Sep-05-03  ughaibu: Anderssen's approach was beyond the triviality of match points.
Jan-13-05  aw1988: <Anderssen has won this match!!! Not Steinitz!!!> Actually, Anderssen won the game, but Steinitz won the match.
Jul-18-07  ALEXIN: 21. Qh6 threating penetration in white position via d2 is really a powerful move.
Jul-18-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  lilfoohk: Playing King's gambit aganist an expert of King's gambit , Steinitz is really brave.I thought he would have chosen some quiet lines
Jan-12-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  heuristic: mo' better moves:

16.Bxd6 cxd6 17.Nc7+ Kd8 18.Nxa8 b6

Jan-31-12  Knight13: <lilfoohk: Playing King's gambit aganist an expert of King's gambit , Steinitz is really brave.I thought he would have chosen some quiet lines> I believe "bold" is a more accurate word.

<ALEXIN: 21. Qh6 threating penetration in white position via d2 is really a powerful move.> That move deserves an exclamation mark. 22. h4 is the correct move.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Adolf Anderssen: +16, -16, =1
from Steinitz' Rare Defeats. by nikolaas
King's Gambit: Accepted. Salvio Gambit (C37) 0-1 It's mate in 1
from 1870s - 1890s Classic Chess Principles Arise by fredthebear
Match Steinitz!
by amadeus
King's Gambit: Accepted. Salvio Gambit (C37) 0-1 It's mate in 1
from Game collection: 7Up by fredthebear
miniatures
by maheshml
22.Bd3 and more...
from World Championships Blunders by amadeus
2nd rank intrusion by black
from King's Gambit attacking games by Calar
24 moves
from Chess Miniatures, Collection VII by wwall
Wild game ends with queen intrusion
from Romantic era of chess by Calar
King's Gambit: Accepted. Salvio Gambit (C37) 0-1 It's mate in 1
from Anderssen, Blackburne, Charousek by monet11
World champions lose miniatures 1.
by ughaibu
Match Anderssen!
by chessgain


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC