Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Adolf Anderssen vs Samuel Rosenthal
Baden-Baden (1870), Baden-Baden GER, rd 2, Jul-19
Italian Game: Evans Gambit (C51)  ·  0-1


explore this opening
find similar games 6 more Anderssen/S Rosenthal games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Some games have photographs. These are denoted in the game list with the icon.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
Mar-23-08  nimh: 33.Rxf7! could have put up tougher resistance.
Apr-30-10  ariel el luchador: una partida pésima de Anderssen no merece mayores comentarios
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: <nimh: 33.Rxf7! could have put up tougher resistance.>

33.Rxg7 (I guess this is what you have meant) 33...hxg4 34.Rxh7+ Kxh7 35.Rxc3 gxf3 36.Rxc7+ Kg6 was a bit better but still hopeless due to many weak Pawns of white.

Btw, white's decisive mistake (besides of putting his Rook in offside) was 28.Re1 combined with 29.g3 which allowed black to drive away the white Bishop from covering e5 and to prepare Re5 with tempo due to possibility to attack the Rook on e1.

Aug-21-12  nimh: Yes, "g" instead of "f", my bad. It was so long ago that I've now forgotten why I ever bothered to mention that move.
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <nimh: Yes, "g" instead of "f", my bad....>

For this egregious error, you shall be flayed! Or is it 'glayed'?

Sep-24-12  ariel el luchador: todavía con 23 A1A ganaba que desperdicio
Jan-29-15  poorthylacine: Recognize the error of the move 28 by playing 29.Rd1 was still better, even with a tempo lost.
Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Evening: Rosenthal entered Baden-Baden 1870 hoping to salvage a draw or two against the best players, but rather exceeded expectations with wins vs. Anderssen and Neumann, who finished 1 and 3.

I have a feeling White could have conducted the attack much better (I don't like 22.d5), but Black deserves credit for managing much better defense than one usually sees in 19th Century games. The Qd8-e8-f7-g8-h7 maneuver looks very clever, and his use of e5 as a strong point for Rook and Bishop leads to victory. If sound, this looks like an underrated defensive brilliancy in an age of sacrificial attacks.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Match Anderssen!
by chessgain
Match Anderssen!
by amadeus
Round Two
from Baden-Baden 1870 by suenteus po 147

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC