chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Boris Spassky vs David Bronstein
Amsterdam Candidates (1956), Amsterdam NED, rd 12, Apr-18
King's Indian Defense: Saemisch Variation (E80)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 23 more Spassky/Bronstein games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you missed a Game of the Day, you can review the last year of games at our Game of the Day Archive.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jan-28-03  refutor: i was speaking about overly optimistic players in a different post, but bronstein's evaluation of the position after Nxf1 is overly optimistic. you could play this game out 100 times and i don't think that bronstein would beat spassky once
Jan-28-03  refutor: actually i take that back...apparently the position after 10. ... Nxf1 is well known and i'm just flaunting my ignorance. i will have to study some of Black's wins such as Spycher Bernard vs Jeroen Piket, 1986 and Schienmann Bruno vs Jeroen Piket, 1987 and T Ernst vs Lind Jan-Olov, 1990
Jan-23-04  Helloween: Yes, Black has very immense compensation with the 2 Bishops and 2 pawns for the Queen, plus White's King being stuck in the centre. Yasser Seirawan even talks about him drawing easily with the Black pieces against Kasparov in one of his books. According to my database, White wins 40% of the games, Black wins 30% and 30% are drawn.
Jan-31-04  Everett: The most interesting thing here is that Bronstein was the first to ever play this variation! He put it on the map!
Sep-10-04  Resignation Trap: In the Russian tournament bulletin of this tournament, Goldberg states that, instead of the routine recapture 20...Bxf5, Bronstein missed the opportunity to play 20...Ne7! If then 21. fxg6 Nf5 22. gxh7+?? Kh8! and Black has a winning attack: 23. Qe1 Nd3 24 Qd2 Nh4+ 25. Kg3 Rg8+.

In this line, on the better 22. Qe1 Nd3 23. Qd2 Nh4+ 24. Kg3 Nf5+ gives Black an easy draw.

If Bronstein wanted more than a draw, he could also try (instead of 21...Nf5) 21...Nxg6, with the idea of playing ...c7-c6, opening up more lines.

Apr-14-05  allanon880: Excellent play by Spassky. He still could not compare to Bobby Fischer.
Apr-14-05  RookFile: Playing over this, I think this is
a very interesting game. Great
idea by Bronstein.

See below for another good game:

Kasparov vs Seirawan, 1989

Apr-23-05  Everett: Bronstein's only loss against the Samisch, according to the database.
Mar-15-09  WhiteRook48: of course, what would have led him into this sacrificing-the-queen variation is pretty strange
Jun-27-09  Everett: <WhiteRook48> Fantasy! Something different!
Apr-11-10  DrGridlock: In his book, The Sorcerer's Apprentice, Bronstein gives some insight into the opening choice for this game.

"Spassky came to this tournament only hours after having become the new Junior World Champion. I decided to play a sharp game. ... We have played many fine games but I never managed to win and I know why. I always tried to disrupt his logical play right from the opening. It worked against others such as Botvinnik but it failed against Spassky!"

Sep-28-11  DrMAL: Very creative try by Bronstein I guess at least against Spassky it was maybe better to play 9...Qe7 and get battle through kings castled on opposite sides. Draw before 22...Nc5?!
Mar-30-13  Rick360: This is my first exposure to this variation (I'm "club level" strength, btw) and I'm not sure I could ever get comfortable playing the White side of this chaotic line.
Mar-30-13  Jim Bartle: I've played against this with white. It's really tough to break through, especially with all 8 black pawns on their original files.
Mar-30-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <Jim> Funny, the things one remembers: in one of many battles with Jean Hebert at the Friday night blitz events at Montreal's former Specialiste d'Echecs many years ago, he played the queen sacrifice. I didn't manage to break through, and Jean untangled and won.
Dec-12-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  saffuna: In "Sorcerer's Apprentice" Bronstein points out how black could improve in a game between Rhodes and Learner at the 1965 Hastings club championship. That game varies with 12. Ke2 Nc2 13. Rc1 Nd4+ 14.

Not in the chessgames database.

Dec-13-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  saffuna: Bronstein after 30...Nxd5:

"Black originally sacrificed his queen to obtain the pair of bishops. All that now remains are two knights!"

Apr-18-24  FearNoseAll: < Rick360: This is my first exposure to this variation (I'm "club level" strength, btw) and I'm not sure I could ever get comfortable playing the White side of this chaotic line.> i could not be comfortable playing it as black either
Apr-28-25
Premium Chessgames Member
  MarcusBierce: This line is rarely if ever played nowadays.

<DrMAL: Very creative try by Bronstein I guess at least against Spassky it was maybe better to play 9...Qe7 and get battle through kings castled on opposite sides. >

Bronstein played ..Qe7 in two interesting computer battles back in 1992, and achieved advantages in both games.

Deep Thought vs Bronstein, 1992

Deep Thought vs Bronstein, 1992

Think there is still room to discover interesting play in this line.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC