chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing


register now - it's free!
Robert James Fischer vs Robert Wade
Vinkovci (1968)  ·  King's Gambit: Declined. Petrov's Defense (C30)  ·  1-0
To move:
Last move:

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 5 times; par: 72 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 2 more Fischer/Wade games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Premium members can see a list of all games that they have seen recently at their Game History Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with the default chess viewer, please see the Pgn4web Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
Dec-17-03  InspiredByMorphy: I like the way Fischer played this game. Calm and collectively. Black played strangely 2.Nf6 instead of exf first.
Mar-07-05  THE pawn: I like the Other player's style too, it was some sort of comprehension between both players...like moves 32 to 35
Nov-28-10  mastermind7994: I see this game as exploiting the greater player's strength with simple and non-risky moves. Although King's Gambit is a risky opening black didn't go into risky variations with accepting the pawn for example. Fischer simply outplayed him.
Nov-28-10  solskytz: (to THE pawn)

not exactly comprehension...

in Wade's place I would go 17...Ne7 rather than ...f5.

Why?

Bobby was thinking about the endgame very early on. After the Q exchange, his only advantage is the advanced position of his central pawns.

But how to exploit it without any pieces out?

Well - if he can exchange his e pawn for the opponent's d pawn (no matter that he helps his adversary's development in so doing), he creates an asymmetrical pawn formation: 4:3 in his favor on the Q-side, 2:3 against him on the K-side.

In itself, this could still be pretty balanced. A 4:3 majority is kind of clumsy to exploit. It takes quite time to mobilize, and the enemy also has his chances on the other wing (and he does try, oh yes does he try...) BUT - if he can weaken and paralyze black's Q-side minority (such as after 18. Bxc6 bc), then he has a long-term, stable, clearly crushing advantage.

Then he can sit and wait. Let Black exhaust himself on the K-side. We can even accept some concessions (such as the interesting B-manoeuvre - g3, h2, g1). We can suffer this, even with opposite colour B's).

Sooner or later black has no means to further his position on the K-side. this could be quite frustrating in playing against Fischer: his wasn't a very preventive or prophylactic style. In many games he would create a long-term advantage and then let you attack for 10-15 moves. You think that you control the flow of the game, but he already saw that nothing will come out of your efforts, and when you have nothing left to do, then he kills you, not softly.

As the black initiative (in the face of sure Q-side loss, by reason of the pawn formation) wears off, White starts to advance in the Q-side. c4 can't be prevented. If the B has to move from d5, f3 will hang and the white R will have access to the Q-side, where pawns can no longer defend one another (a key point in every variation, and the reason I wouldn't let Fischer play 18.Bxc6).

Question: What can black do?

Answer: play into white's hands, simplify, allow an exchange of opposite colour B's (a drawing factor) and a couple of pawns, so that the situation is made even clearer: Black has nothing to show for his efforts on the K-side; strangely enough, it is exactly there that White's winning advantage is now manifest.

Jul-01-11  Damianx: Thanks 4 the effort solskytz well done
Dec-14-11  ScottWeatherill: 20. h4 stands out for me.... decimates the king side black pawn structure and allows consecutive white queen pawn threats dictate the endgame. Ruthless.
Dec-14-11  ScottWeatherill: and g3 is the cherry on top
Dec-14-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  harrylime: < solskytz >

Only just briefly glanced at the position where you recommend 17..Ne7 instead of Wade's 17..f5.. But it seems to lose the exchange after 18. Be5. Black moves his rook on h8 then 19. Bf6 ect..Excellent post by you and let me have another look ! lol

Dec-14-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  harrylime: Yeah just seen 18.. f6 in reply to Be5. exploiting the white king's position. So yeah I prefer Ne7 and you're right.
Dec-14-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  harrylime: Yeah agree. 29. g3 is cute.

These type of endgames are notoriously difficult but Fischer at this time in his career made them look ridiculously easy ...

Oct-16-12  newzild: I'd be curious to know how Fischer would have responded to 28...Bxa2, as after 29. Ra5 Bf7 30. Rxa7 Bxh5 Black has regained his pawn.
Apr-15-14  sicilianhugefun: Extremely logical, solid and sound Chess. Can't think of any human being who can surpass or even equal Fischer in this kind of playing style. It's almost perfect...

Now on DVD
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collection [what is this?]
King Gambit Declined / Petrov Defence
from Opening Studies by akaade


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2014, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies