chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Anthony Saidy vs Robert James Fischer
"The 11th Hour" (game of the day Apr-20-2018)
US Championship (1963/64), New York, NY USA, rd 11, Jan-01
English Opening: Symmetrical. Anti-Benoni Variation Spielmann Defense (A33)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 18 times; par: 118 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 6 more Saidy/Fischer games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To access more information about the players (more games, favorite openings, statistics, sometimes a biography and photograph), click their highlighted names at the top of this page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jun-05-14  Strelets: Yep, page 249 of Karsten Müller's edition of Fischer's games (Milford, CT: Russell Enterprises, 2009) gives 47...Nh5? as the move played and analyzes 47...Ne4, coming to the evaluation of after a ten-move variation. I find it frustrating as a student of history when failure to examine primary sources (Chess Life & Review; the January 4, 1964 New York Times) leads to the introduction of moves that were never actually played. It seems that the error began with 1973's "Schach-Phänomen Bobby Fischer" and was repeated by Timman, Kasparov, Müller...
Jun-05-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: That should have been a red flag to Mueller.

it is only one of a dozen (or more) mistakes in his book.

Jun-05-14  RookFile: Fischer probably spent all night on the endgame, to make sure he's go 11-0. The idea that he comes back and makes a mistake 3 or 4 moves in should have been a non-starter.
Jun-05-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: Another contemporary source: "Sports Illustrated", January 13, 1964, p. 15, gives <47...N-K5> (47...Ne4).

Edward Winter's Chess Note. no. 7031, http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/... , also notes that Saidy confirmed 47...Ne4 in a letter published by Larry Evans in his Chess Life column in 1986.

Winter also notes that Saidy contributed an introduction to the game in Mueller's 2009 book about Fischer which uses 47...Nh5, but surely contributing an introduction does not imply that Saidy was familiar with the given score or analysis.

There seems to me no doubt that 47...Ne4 (47...N-K5) was the move, and that 47...Nh5 probably stems from an error in translating the score into algebraic..

However, I don't buy the theory that Fischer couldn't have made the mistake. Remember that, according the Kmoch's account, Saidy's sealed move (44.Be1) was totally unexpected. A combination of mild shock, tension, and fatigue can do strange things to even the finest chess mind. While it didn't in this case, it would have been very possible..

Jun-05-14  RookFile: Agreed, anybody can make a mistake. However, in this case, it was unexpectedly pleasant for Fischer.
Jul-26-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  yiotta: How many of us would have been satisfied to play 56...f2 instead of going the extra step and completely eliminating any resistance with 56...Ne3 and 57...Nf5?
Jul-26-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  Mating Net: <How many of us would have been satisfied to play 56...f2> I would like to think that I would at least look for something stronger than the tempting ...f2. I suspect Fischer rejected ...f2 immediately in favor of ...Ne3 and a total stranglehold on the position.
Jul-26-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  yiotta: <Mating Net-I suspect Fischer rejected...f2 immediately> I think so too, masters of all crafts are never satisfied with "just good enough".
May-13-16  newzild: <How many of us would have been satisfied to play 56...f2>

56...f2 drags the game out because it allows White to play 57. Bxf2 followed by Kb4-Kc5-Kb6 etc, attacking Black's queenside pawns and hoping to promote the pawn on a4.

May-13-16  RookFile: It's an unbelievable endgame. You look at the position after move 28 and get worried for white because he's got too many pawns on the same color as his bishop. Saidy is no dummy - he starts moving his pawns to the light squares, yet loses anyway. Fischer keeps the pressure up and provokes him into one mistake, which is all he needs.
Nov-18-16  denopac: This game was cited by Magnus Carlsen as the first game to come to mind when asked at the press conference after game 6 of the Karjakin match to choose his favorite Fischer game. He said that he was impressed by Fischer's handling of the knight vs. bishop ending.
Nov-19-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <yiotta: How many of us would have been satisfied to play 56...f2 instead of going the extra step and completely eliminating any resistance with 56...Ne3 and 57...Nf5?>

Any competent player will observe that Fischer's method at the finish is the clean way to the full point.

Feb-16-17  Howard: Last night I looked at Marin's excellent Learn From the Legends to see which "version" of Fischer's 47th move that he had, and it was....47...Nh5.

He even analyzes the "position" in detail, arguing that Saidy could have come close to drawing, but not quite.

A lot of us no doubt remember the infamous typo in Fischer's M60MG regarding the Fischer-Tal game from the 1959 Candidates. Back in 1978, Pal Benko remarked in CL&R regarding that error, "It's hard to erase a misprint once it appears in the literature." Well put!

To put it another way, someone goofed regarding Fischer's 47th move, and as a result, the error (and the misleading analysis) has been passed on from book to book.

Mar-24-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: Daniel ♔ has analysed this endgame, too: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=shx...
Sep-19-17  Xeroxx: Robert James Fischer (?)
0 Inaccuracies
0 Mistakes
0 Blunders
3 Average centipawn loss

That's pretty good.

Nov-02-17  kishore4u: Excellent endgame!!!
Dec-05-17  GT3RS: Fischer easily one of the greatest endgame player after the mighty Capa of course.
Dec-05-17  ughaibu: I'm beginning to think that you might be one of the most boring posters. After the great Harry, of course.
Jan-06-18  GT3RS: And I think you're my most annoying follower to date. It's good to follow your superiors, but damn stay in your lane until called upon ok? That's your first lesson. :)
Apr-20-18  The Kings Domain: Nothing special but a Fischer game is always worth the play.
Apr-20-18  Howard: Keep in mind that Capablanca's alleged endgame prowess has been, arguably, overrated. Ironically, Fischer was one of those who argued that Capa's strong suit was in the middlegame, not the endgame.

Andy Soltis argued likewise in a 1984 CL column, as I recall.

Apr-20-18  fisayo123: Classic stuff for GOTD. One of the greatest endgames of all time.
Apr-20-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sneaky: Stockfish says that Saidy could have kept the balance with 44.Ke2 Nxg4 45.Bg1 Kf5 46.Kf3 b5 47.axb5 axb5 48.b3 Kg5 = 0.00 (66 ply) But instead 44.Be1? and it's curtains. I really don't underhand the complexities.

It seems like the rule is, when Fischer has a bishop, of course he wins — bishops are better than knights! And he provides a textbook demonstration of how bishops beat knights in endings. But when he has a knight, then it's all "bishop, schmishop!" and he goes on provides a demonstration of how pawn structure and king placement can make the knight superior.

Aug-07-18  deSitter: The controversy over move ..47 is just another example of how compressed algebraic notation is a PITA. I still prefer traditional English notation. I never understood what all the controversy about notation is. Both systems are trivial to understand, but mistakes are far more likely in compressed algebraic, and there is no doubt that it is harder to read.
Aug-07-18  Howard: Someone made a similar point in Larry Evans on Chess back in the mid-70's, to which Evans replied, "Tradition dies hard."

I grew up with descriptive, personally, but I resigned myself to algebraic eventually. No big deal, by my view.

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 3)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Devilz's favorite games
by Devilz
Robert James Fischer
by ALL
Power Chess - Fischer
by Anatoly21
11-0 in his matches.
from The 10 Greatest Games Of Bobby Fischer by FischerSpasskyGuy
Game 73
from On My Great Predecessors 4 (Kasparov) by Qindarka
Fischer goes summarily to endgame and then wins.
from endgame paraphernalia by tonsillolith
25
from A33 (Sax) by mneuwirth
Endgame Themes
by KingG
Fischer demonstrates strong knight vs bad bishop
from joachimvhw's favorite games by joachimvhw
Finales
by Adoryn
Knight dominates Bishop
from armarosis' favorite endgames by armarosis
Robert Fischer's Best Games
by Patca63
Some Aspects of the Endgame
from Positional Chess Handbook I by Kanenda
Strong Knight vs Bad Bishop
from Instructive Endgames by Rio Mike
Bobby Fischer's U.S. Championship Games
by LionHeart40
chessychessMD's favorite games
by chessychessMD
End game: Exploiting the bad bishop. Start at move 23.
from Foodfight's Chess Club Games by foodfight
Knight dominates Bishop - Fischer's final win 11-0 sweep
from 1960s- The Rise of Fredthebear & Fischer King by fredthebear
Game 82
from Veliki majstori saha 29 FISCHER (I) -Marovic by Chessdreamer
US Campionship ,New York 1964 (11-0)
from Bobby Fischer: Selected Games from 1955-1992 by fernando.laroca
plus 68 more collections (not shown)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC