chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Mikhail Tal vs Georgy Tadzhikanovich Agzamov
Sochi (1984), 10, Oct-??
Tarrasch Defense: Symmetrical Variation (D32)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 1 more Tal/G Agzamov game
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Mar-26-07  micartouse: Wow, what a bizarre game. Black wins the exchange in an energetic way and then proceeds to just torture White with about 40 pointless moves.
Mar-26-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  plang: Agzamov was a very strong GM who died in an accident at age 32.
Jul-20-07  Davolni: wow... what a game.......

I wonder what was going on?? were they trying to test each others' nerves?? who's got stronger nerves??

or where they trying to tease each other????

Sep-06-19  faulty: what was going on? Evidently, in 1984, the player with advantage - in the absence of a clear plan - would wait for an adjournment. then, other things may happen, e.g., you have two adjourned games and are very tired and only have time and energy to analyze one of them. so you drag on twenty more moves and adjourn again. then you analyze, and if you find a plan, you win at the board; if there is no victory, you offer a draw. as we see here, it took two adjournments to find the winning plan
Sep-06-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: Tack about, make it through the first five hours, then adjourn to analyse at leisure--part and parcel of the game in those days. The most famous example of adjournment analysis saving a player's bacon was the celebrated Botvinnik-Fischer encounter. The flip side of tacking was the player who would err by playing their (typically) 41st move rapidly, right at the five-hour mark, to force their opponent to seal.
Sep-29-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: In fairness to Agzamov, it wasn't obvious how to make progress after winning the exchange.
Sep-29-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  AylerKupp: This looks like a computer game to me, with both players engaging in what I call "engine dithering", with both engines making seemingly purposeless move without making any progress, and coming very close to a draw by repetition situation many times. The last type of game I would expect from Tal, at least in his younger years.
Sep-29-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: <AylerKupp> I think you are being unfair to Tal. He was an exchange down in a non-dynamic position and all he could do was watch for entry points for black and keep them covered, which he did very well for as long as he could. He had no choice but to shuffle back and forth. The onus was on Agzamov. He had the advantage.
Sep-29-19  RookFile: So, there is a mentality of "do not hurry" when you have the advantage. It's possible you can bait your opponent into making a further weakness and actually make the win easier. I think that was what black was trying to do. Tal refused to do something stupid, so the game went on for a while.
Oct-01-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  AylerKupp: <<Fuslli> I think you are being unfair to Tal.>

You're probably right. It was just a frustrating game to replay.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Tarrasch Defense: Symmetrical (D32) 0-1 B&N vs R&N ending
from Roundhouse Ruuks 5 by fredthebear
Tarrasch Defense: Symmetrical (D32) 0-1 B&N vs R&N ending
from Decoy, Deflect, Displace, Doom Defenders A-D-E by fredthebear
d4-d5 break
from Game collection: IQP by KingG
B+N vs R+N
from Master the endgames II by eXodus
UNIVERTAL
by Gottschalk


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC