chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Wolfgang Uhlmann vs Lutz Espig
GDR-ch (1978), Eggesin GDR, rd 6, Feb-??
Old Indian Defense: Normal Variation (A55)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 10 more Uhlmann/L Espig games
sac: 35...R8xe3 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: At the top of the page we display the common English name for the opening, followed by the ECO code (e.g. "A55"). The ECO codes are links that take you to opening pages.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Aug-16-12  LIFE Master AJ: 35...RxB/e3! and 36...Rg2+; with a fork of the K+Q. (White cannot escape.)
Aug-16-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  DavidD: This week's puzzle-positions show the complexity of chess decision making.

In today's position, the classic thinking issue is: examine every check and capture in the position. While ...R2xe3 won't work, ...R8xe3 does. Clearly when White was visualizing this position a few moves before, he saw the first candidate but missed the second.

Yesterday's puzzle was an example of: Who is the stronger chess thinker--the one who sees the mate in 6 (he saw "further") or the one who sees the mate in 3 (he saw "better")? Both Rg8+ and Qg8+ won, however, some found the first candidate simplier to visualize and calculate, some the second candidate.

Tuesday's puzzle also had two candidate moves, but the issue was different. While Rxg6+ won, it lead to a messy position that required lots of calculation. (However, most strong players would consider Rxg6+ first as it is the most forcing move, and if it did win, no need to calculate anything else.) The game move, e5, was a much more efficient win. The move was also of a completely different tactical theme--line blocking of the Black Queen's defense of the f6-square. Anyone who concluded that Rxg6+ won should also examine why they didn't see e5. They may not be seeing interference tactical themes in their move selection process.

The choosing of a chess move is a complex process. Whether we use a structured approach or a messy approach, all of the puzzles this week illustrate ideas we should add to our chess decision making.

Aug-16-12  Tigercock: Got it in about 10 sec.
Aug-16-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  chrisowen: Hi everyone a rook chim ore affect he reprimand just rooke3

leave knight oh drome g4 aim it her d1s good set he trap for

height rook glesson bargain rookxe3 provides have thorn

the disciple thorax side after d1, mage e3 gets rid jack queen is

out hunger spat give knight it a nearly late surge

force fork knight gulf extract our cropper d1 method for

e3 retains the crown for length picket fence off he

marches nutmeg e3 ko rook g2 box a kit sidestep

see white defence call it of the wild dongle it fancy anger

coins 35...r8xe3 36.fxe3 rg2+ king has lip h1 or dervish queen

fall time theory it ok dread rumble it her d1 muster kip e3

and dolce vita nab rook g2 patrol cheerio ja!

Aug-16-12  Everyone: Hi <chrisowen>

2 ask I wanted you always
your mother a dyslexis robot was?

Aug-16-12  The Last Straw: Got it in 1 min.
Aug-16-12  RMKvdS: <chrisowen>'s posts are hard toe decipher, yet looking at the moves he describes, this guy knows his chess. As a matter of fact, I believe this guy would destroy me at the board. He has this mystic aura around him..... He makes CG a more fun place to waste some time!
Aug-16-12  LoveThatJoker: <DavidD> Excellent post!

LTJ

Aug-16-12  TheBish: Uhlmann vs L Espig, 1978

Black to play (35...?) "Medium"

I believe I've seen this before, but not too tough in any event.

35...R8xe3! 36. fxe3

Otherwise Black just wins on material.

36...Rg2+! 37. Kh1

Or 37. Kxg2 Nxe3+ forks king and queen, as does 37. Kf1 Nxe3+.

37...Nf2+ 38. Kxg2 Nxd1 and the rest is easy.

Aug-16-12  Whitehat1963: Brilliant finish! Had me completely in the dark, even though I was looking the whole time for a knight fork. Couldn't find it.
Aug-16-12  PaulLovric: a beautiful finish
Aug-16-12  Abdel Irada: <DavidD> has made an observation from which we could all learn something to our benefit.

Human diversity being what it is, it comes as no surprise that we all think and see the board differently. But chess strength derives in no small part from the ability to synthesize as many different "board views" as possible, improving our chances of seeing all the potential in a given position.

This is part of what makes CG.com valuable. By first finding our own solutions to puzzles, or alternative lines in other games that we may examine, and then comparing notes with other players, we can add other perspectives to our own, yielding the proverbial whole that is greater than the sum of its parts.

Concurrently, we must learn the art of mutual respect. If there are multiple paths to victory, none of them is "wrong," although some may be faster or more efficient than others; all of them are worth noting and adding to our decision-making process.

Aug-16-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  chrisowen: <Everyone> Having a good time are we? I'm putting you on my ignore list, for that!
Aug-16-12  sevenseaman: <Abdel Irada> Thanks for that note on <David2009>. He is a much respected and loved poster for most of us here, may be all. Insightful! I have received valuable help from him unstintingly.
Aug-16-12  Patriot: <LTJ> I agree--That was a nice post by <DavidD>!
Aug-16-12  QueenMe: Missed this one completely. After examining why, it's apparant that I didn't consider the possibility of sacrificing BOTH rooks to set up the knight fork.
Aug-16-12  vvv: <chrisowen: <Everyone> Having a good time are we? I'm putting you on my ignore list, for that!>

Did <chrisowen> just use almost-normal English sentence structure?

Aug-16-12  sevenseaman: I liked <DavidD>'s post though I may have confused the handle with the other David.
Aug-16-12  LoveThatJoker: <Patriot> Thank you! He definitely got it spot on!

LTJ

Aug-17-12  Overgod: Yep, eventually found the double rook sac, (took me all in all about 40 minutes)...

Usually I am good with this stuff. I can solve insane difficulty puzzles in a mere 2 or 3 minutes. But this one: I don't know, perhaps it's just lack of familiarity. If you simply glance at the board for about 2 or 3 minutes, I think most people would love playing white. The rook is trapped and the Knight skewered, and the white queen seems to be in a lovely spot.

But lo and behold, white is lost by force. Quite a difficult puzzle I think. Certainly a 4 star puzzle (rather than just 3).

Aug-17-12  Overgod: Actually, what I meant was: Should be a 3 star puzzle, rather than 2.5 stars.

I would grade it difficult, rather than medium...

Aug-17-12  Abdel Irada: <"...the white queen seems to be in a lovely spot.">

It is in a lovely spot ... from Black's point of view. Of the available squares, only on d1 is it subject to all three possible forks.

Aug-18-12  Overgod: Yep, that is correct, which is why i emphasized the word "seems".

It seems to be in a lovely spot, because from white's point of view, only on that square, does it attack both rook, knight and also attacks the back rank rook indirectly...

But, alas for white, appearances can be very deceiving.

:-)

I can assure you, in 9 out of 10 blitz/bullet games, even between strong players, (not GMs), white would win this position.

Aug-18-12  Abdel Irada: Not if they've solved this puzzle. ;-)

(Although, human memory being what it is....)

Apr-29-13  Everett: For those who haven't played this game through, it will be a treat to do so. Black's 16th, 21st, and 32nd are each worth a look.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 3)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
98_A53-A55_OLD Indian Defense (aka Altindisch)
by whiteshark
black will win the queen by a knight fork! HONEST!
from Kinnelon Colts-knights horsing around by kevin86
35...? (Thursday, August 16)
from Puzzle of the Day 2012 by Phony Benoni
Forcing a knight fork
from DrChopper's study games 3 by DrChopper
Q sac and nice finish
from Fun w/the Old Indian (& Rat) Compiled by yiotta by fredthebear
35...? Cute knight fork!
from More of Nova's favorite games by Nova
35 ...? sac here and there
from iking's favorite games 3 by iking
665_Tactical motif ROYAL FORK
by whiteshark
Q sac and nice finish
from Having Fun with the Old Indian (and The Rat) by yiotta
shakman's favorite games
by shakman
venderbest's black
by venderbest
OIDs
by fredthebear
partij 71
from hans bouwmeesters 100 briljante partijen by i.abderrahim
35...? (August 16, 2012)
from Thursday Puzzles, 2011-2017 by Phony Benoni


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC