chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

David Bronstein vs Deep Thought (Computer)
New York (1992) (rapid)
Sicilian Defense: Wing Gambit. Marshall Variation (B20)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 11 times; par: 34 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 17 more Bronstein/Deep Thought games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jan-29-04  popski: Hmm, looks like there's no way out... 25. ... fe5 26. c6
Jan-29-04  Kenkaku: A silicon beast taken down by a Wing Gambit.
Jan-29-04  rythm: it is apparent that the silicon beast is no beast but a stupid worm!this is the worst game ive ever seen
Jan-30-04  TrueFiendish: With all due respect, if it's the worst game you've ever seen, you need to get out more.
Apr-15-04  InspiredByMorphy: Great play by Bronstein! Fierce development.
Apr-15-04  weepingwarrior: Bronstein has had many a game with chess programs, and he's been very successful too! I am not surprised by this game, very well played, It's just Bronstein in his glory. It's as if he handicapped Blues king side.
Sep-26-07  Jesspatrick: This is the horizon effect in full view
Oct-23-11  rwbean: I've always thought this game looked dodgy ... 13 ... e6 is better, and 14. Nb5!! is crushing but would be really hard for a human to see (14. Nb5 Qxh1+ 15. Bf1 Qxh2 16. d5)
Aug-05-12  Patanjali: Lets probe the position at move 13 a little using an oldschool 3GHz Pentium 4, 128MB hash, 1 core, HT=off, all 32bit engines..

<engine> prefers e6 to Qg2 in...

Fritz 5.32 (1997) 15+m
Rebel 12 UCI (2003) 53s
Spike 1.2 Turin (2006) 1s
Rybka 3 (2008) 7s
Fire 2.2 xTreme (2011) 28s
Houdini 1.5T3 (2012) 19s

Now there's a packet of insight. I think what this reveals is that Deep Thought's 13.. Qg2 is well within normal expected play for computer of its time.

Aug-05-12  SChesshevsky: <rwbean: I've always thought this game looked dodgy>

I agree. I'm not sure if it's a one off but the program sure looked like it fully emphasized material gain and didn't value things like development and tempo very much at all.

Aug-05-12  Patanjali: @SChessshevsky

Have you tested any engines from the early 90's to see if the tendency for material gain was typical for engines from that time period? It would be interesting to see some actual results.

If in doubt, here's a bunch of old school chess programs from the 80's and 90's that you might like to test move 13 on.

mediafire.com/?rxx4h7o8qx6cx

Aug-07-12  SChesshevsky: <Patanjali: Have you tested any engines from the early 90's to see if the tendency for material gain was typical for engines from that time period?>

I'm no expert in computer chess but this match looks like it indicates chess engines were just trying to get used to the interplay between the basic chess themes like material, tempo, pawn structure, open lines, etc.

It's fascinating how Deep Thought would seem to play excellent chess at times and then poor chess other times, It's bad play would seem to indicate a poor decision on a theme trade-off at a key point.

Unfortunately, in my opinion, computer chess is kind of sterile now that the pure processing power of the engines makes many thematic poor moves OK or even good because the engine can calculate so far out that it knows the weakness cannot be exploited before other variables come into play.

It seems that at least in Deep Thoughts time, chess practice was still the key variable as opposed to simple future telling by calculating out all the variatons.

Aug-12-12  Patanjali: @SChessshevsky

My guess is that computer chess programming back in the 90's was a little unrefined, mostly due to the fact that programmers were yet to discover how to write better, more "intelligent," algorithms. As a consequence, early 90's engines often behaved materialistically, and lacked an appreciation for more subtler, strategic play.

But for me, computer chess becomes ever more interesting as I watch the digital intelligence rapidly evolve in both hardware and algorithic complexity, function, and performance. Consider that it took humans over 200 thousand years of evolution to reach 2850 elo. By comparison, computer intelligence eclipsed that lofty figure in only 60 or so years, without even having attained self-awareness!

So I look forward to seeing how all this progresses over the next decade or so, especially now that the prospect of enhancing human potential through the use of genetic engineering, neurotechnology, biochemistry, and epigenetics has become a viable possibility. And with greater refinement in genetic and neurotechnology sciences, who knows.. maybe we'll be the ones dominating the computers :)

Aug-12-12  Patanjali: <http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet...>

<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_...>

<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_...>

<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intell...>

<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neurot...>

<http://www.reuters.com/london-olymp...>

Aug-31-12  Patanjali: http://www.wired.com/medtech/health...

http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2...

http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105...

http://www.acceleratingfuture.com/m...

http://www.aboutintelligence.co.uk/...

Apr-12-19  stanleys: Much prettier conclusion of the game could have been 22... Qxf3 23. Qc7+ Nxc7 24. Nb6+ Kb8 25. Rxd8+ Ka7 26. Ra8+ Nxa8 27. Nc8#
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: RAPID. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Game 202
from Sorcerer's Apprentice (Bronstein) by isfsam
SWG, Marshall Var (B20) 1-0 Both castle long
from 2 Turns Left. Help yourself says Fredthebear. by fredthebear
SWG, Marshall Var (B20) 1-0 Both castle long
from DB told secrets to FTB by fredthebear
Bronstein vs Computers.
by lostemperor
Game 202
from Sorcerer's Apprentice (Bronstein) by Qindarka
B20 Sicillian Wing Gambit
by parmetd
Computer - GM games 1963-2002
by biglo
wing gambit victories
by InspiredByMorphy
Chess Miniatures, Collection XIV
by PinkLedDoor
Game 202
from Sorcerer's Apprentice (Bronstein) by hought67
Chess Miniatures, Collection XIV
by wwall
Game 202
from Sorcerer's Apprentice (Bronstein) by Ziiggyy
Deep Thought Out Thought
from Boo Chess Computers! by Vurdh
Game 202
from Sorcerer's Apprentice (Bronstein) by Parmenides1963
WingGambit
by lord1412


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC