chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Bartlomiej Macieja vs Viswanathan Anand
36th Olympiad (2004), Calvia ESP, rd 13, Oct-28
Torre Attack: Classical Defense. Nimzowitsch Variation (A46)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 4 more Macieja/Anand games
sac: 22...Nf4+ PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You should register a free account to activate some of Chessgames.com's coolest and most powerful features.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Nov-01-04  themindset: It looked like white had a strong advantage until he played 17.g3 , a move who's motivation i do not understand at all.
Nov-01-04  clocked: How about stopping Nf4
Nov-01-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  acirce: Mig Greengard: <No disrespect to Vishy, but his win today over Macieja was a joke. White is completely winning until he decides to force Anand to play a piece sac that is at least equal. I mean, it's either play that sac or resign. What was Macieja thinking? Just Ne5 instead of Qd1 and Black can resign somewhere around move 20. Bizarre.> and <I was just surprised. Really terrible. You don't often see Vishy totally busted in 20 moves.>

The line would be something like 21.Ne5 Nxe5 22.dxe5 Qd8 23.f4. I agree that White is definitely better, look at Black's pathetic kingside, but I think Mig is exaggerating a lot: "completely winning", "resign around move 20"

However, this is without a doubt what Macieja should have played, especially in his time trouble where he definitely should have avoided the complications after ..Nf4+.

Nov-01-04  Shams: hey acirce how about a url for mig`s quote?
Nov-01-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  acirce: http://www.chessninja.com/dailydirt...
Nov-01-04  Shams: thanks. I see you and Mig had a little back-and-forth about it.

Swede or not, your English is impeccable. But come on, you like KRAMNIK? Ugh...how boring!!

peace.

Nov-01-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  acirce: Ironically, I had to look up "impeccable" ;-) Heh, yes, let's revive the old Kramnik-is-boring discussion. Or let's just say it is completely subjective. For me chess on such a high level just can't be boring, which of course doesn't mean I can't prefer certain playing styles.
Nov-01-04  Shams: I think he`s a great guy, I just think he plays not to lose and it makes me miss world champions who felt honor-bound to fight every move. But then that`s just my opinion, which is, well-- not worth much of anything, is it. cheers.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collection[what is this?]
Anand's risky move turn to a win
from 2004 Chess Olympiad by chessmoron


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC