chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Samuel Tinsley vs Emanuel Lasker
London (1899), London ENG, rd 12, Jun-14
Queen Pawn Game: Veresov Attack (D00)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 8 times; par: 64 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 3 more Tinsley/Lasker games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Oct-24-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: Hoffer's only comment in the tournament book came after 13. Na4:

<In developing with the King's Fianchetto, White relinquishes the advantage of first move. Lasker, as usual, plays the correct opening moves, while White does not seem to have any fixed plan. At last there is a combination which amounts to attacking a pawn and exchanging off a piece. Then comes a period of doing nothing, whilst Black brings his forces into strategical positions, and when the attack commences White's game crumbles to pieces. There is no need to say more about this game.>

Position after 28....g5:


click for larger view

Tinsley's 29. Nf4 trap is clever, and allows him to trade off Lasker's louring bishop on e4. But in the meantime Black's pawns are taking down the king's ramparts. Lasker gets in a little zinger of his own at the end with a sham rook sacrifice.

Jan-09-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  KEG: As keypusher indicated elsewhere on this site, Tinsley's opening play in this game was awful. His strategy seemed to be to lock in his dark-square bishop and pray that Lasker blundered. By move 10, Tinsely was strategically lost.

The only remarkable thing about this game is the fact that Lasker, though taking his time to position his pieces for his eventual winning king's-side attack, never lost his grip on the game and maintained his winning edge from move 10 until the end.

I do, however, disagree with keypusher (whose analysis is almost always spot on) about the merits of Tinsley's 29. Nf4. I see nothing clever about this move. Lasker was obviously not going to play 29...gxN and lose his Queen, and 29. Nf4 only hastened Tinsley's defeat. 29. Bg2 offered the "best" hope of survival, though there is little chance that anyone could have held back Lasker by this point.

I did like what keypusher aptly called Lasker's "sham rook sacrifice" (36...Rc4). It was cute to see Lasker with a hanging Rook as Tinsely resigned the hopeless contest.

There were many games of real interest in the London 1899 tournament. This was not one of them.

Jan-09-17  RookFile: White tried to bait black into doing something rash. Instead, Lasker applied steady pressure.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
QP: Catalan/Veresov Attack (D00) 0-1 Who's got who?
from Book Master Bob Long Helped Fredthebear BackWhen by fredthebear
QP: Catalan/Veresov Attack (D00) 0-1 Who's got who?
from yPawn Levers, Rollers, Bones, Forks, + , Promos by fredthebear
The Lion King
by chocobonbon
London 1899
by JoseTigranTalFischer
QP: Catalan/Veresov Attack (D00) 0-1 Who's got who?
from Emanuel Lasker Collection by hrannar
London 1899
by suenteus po 147
QP: Catalan/Veresov Attack (D00) 0-1 Who's got who?
from h-file Attacks, some Greek Gifts by Fredthebear by JoseTigranTalFischer
QP: Catalan/Veresov Attack (D00) 0-1 Who's got who?
from h-file Attacks, some Greek Gifts by Fredthebear by Del ToRo


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC