chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Samuel Tinsley vs Emanuel Lasker
London (1899), London ENG, rd 12, Jun-14
Queen Pawn Game: Veresov Attack (D00)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 7 times; par: 63 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 3 more Tinsley/Lasker games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If we are missing an important game, you can submit it (in PGN format) at our PGN Upload Utility.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Oct-24-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: Hoffer's only comment in the tournament book came after 13. Na4:

<In developing with the King's Fianchetto, White relinquishes the advantage of first move. Lasker, as usual, plays the correct opening moves, while White does not seem to have any fixed plan. At last there is a combination which amounts to attacking a pawn and exchanging off a piece. Then comes a period of doing nothing, whilst Black brings his forces into strategical positions, and when the attack commences White's game crumbles to pieces. There is no need to say more about this game.>

Position after 28....g5:


click for larger view

Tinsley's 29. Nf4 trap is clever, and allows him to trade off Lasker's louring bishop on e4. But in the meantime Black's pawns are taking down the king's ramparts. Lasker gets in a little zinger of his own at the end with a sham rook sacrifice.

Jan-09-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  KEG: As keypusher indicated elsewhere on this site, Tinsley's opening play in this game was awful. His strategy seemed to be to lock in his dark-square bishop and pray that Lasker blundered. By move 10, Tinsely was strategically lost.

The only remarkable thing about this game is the fact that Lasker, though taking his time to position his pieces for his eventual winning king's-side attack, never lost his grip on the game and maintained his winning edge from move 10 until the end.

I do, however, disagree with keypusher (whose analysis is almost always spot on) about the merits of Tinsley's 29. Nf4. I see nothing clever about this move. Lasker was obviously not going to play 29...gxN and lose his Queen, and 29. Nf4 only hastened Tinsley's defeat. 29. Bg2 offered the "best" hope of survival, though there is little chance that anyone could have held back Lasker by this point.

I did like what keypusher aptly called Lasker's "sham rook sacrifice" (36...Rc4). It was cute to see Lasker with a hanging Rook as Tinsely resigned the hopeless contest.

There were many games of real interest in the London 1899 tournament. This was not one of them.

Jan-09-17  RookFile: White tried to bait black into doing something rash. Instead, Lasker applied steady pressure.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
QP: Catalan/Veresov Attack (D00) 0-1 Who's got who?
from h-file Attacks, some Greek Gifts by Fredthebear by JoseTigranTalFischer
QP: Catalan/Veresov Attack (D00) 0-1 Who's got who?
from Cats, KIDS playing in the Gruenfelds by fredthebear
QP: Catalan/Veresov Attack (D00) 0-1 Who's got who?
from Vere's Attic by fredthebear
QP: Catalan/Veresov Attack (D00) 0-1 Who's got who?
from h-file Attacks, some Greek Gifts by Fredthebear by Del ToRo
London 1899
by JoseTigranTalFischer
The Lion King
by chocobonbon
QP: Catalan/Veresov Attack (D00) 0-1 Who's got who?
from Emanuel Lasker Collection by hrannar
London 1899
by suenteus po 147


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2018, Chessgames Services LLC