< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 3 OF 5 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
Nov-12-11
 | | LIFE Master AJ: I wouldn't give you two cents for all of your spouting ... or your "supposed" (Class "D"?) chess analysis ... its worse than than spam. And ANY engine picks 6...Bg7; over 6...Bh6. If you cannot be truthful about this - then your PC is (either) busted or infected with a computer virus. |
|
Nov-12-11
 | | LIFE Master AJ: And I didn't just quote just MCO, but also Nunn and Nigel Davies. But to you, that must all be garbage too. After all, you are all so much better than either of those fish. |
|
Nov-12-11 | | SimonWebbsTiger: John Nunn's NCO? But that is from 1998 or something. Nigel Davies' book is from 2005 if it's the 2nd edition. Yelena Dembo's book, which took a fresh look at a double edged and risky exchange nab, instead of the usual 6...Bg7, is from 2008. Funny why the Dutch call their publication <New> In Chess and not <Old in Chess>, <Bit Out of Date in Chess>, etc. AJ may brag of his books - always quoting MCO 15 though! - but that doesn't change the fact that a putz with no books and a putz with loads of books is still a putz. |
|
Nov-12-11 | | DrMAL: Just catching up on "discussion" here. Let's see...FF has managed to conveniently forget that he attracted attention in the first place by posting/paging/videoing "analysis" with an obviously wrong answer for moves 11-12. Here, he used (actually, misused) an engine and he made clear to having no clue that there was actually theory behind the correct move, it was part of a well known line. Now, after being shown there is a line of theory here, FF is telling the chess world that whole line is no good, move 6...Bh6 that defined it, played by Hodgson is totally wrong. Nothing new there either. Yes, FF, you are right, people who know nothing about Trompowsky such as GMs Hodgson, Portisch, and Shirov are all wrong for even attempting the line they created with that move, like us they should have asked the great Florida Fischer. You were right about moves 11-12 too, chess world is unworthy to behold your great genius. |
|
Nov-12-11 | | BobbyFissure: Wow. This game makes my head hurt. I wonder what the engines think after 12...Nc6 or ..e6. Is black still in trouble or coming out better there? |
|
Nov-12-11 | | DrMAL: <BF> I cannot blame you, this opening line is quite sophisticated, leave it Tromp king GM Hodgson (and GM Aleksandrov, he is old friend) to create such a sharp line! After 12.d6 black was not lost but seriously disadvantaged, 12...Rg8 is only move to possibly save game here is very quick eval (scores get worse as computer is allowed time to go deeper). Houdini_20_x64: 22/72 15:14 9,307,617,335
-0.86 12. ... Rg8 13.Bd3 e6 14.0-0 Kf8
-1.64 12. ... Nc6 13.Bd3 b6 14.dxe7 Nxe7
-1.64 12. ... b6 13.Bd3 Nc6 14.dxe7 Nxe7
In trying to explain how something as abberant as AJ syndrome could exist, I think answer comes from him maybe teaching beginners. In looking at video for first time, aside from nausea, the clear impression I got was that his audience was assumed to be beginner, definitely someone less than ELO 1000. As person with silly USCF floor for life master thing, he must be used to being thought of as Chess God by beginner, and cannot fathom that average player on this site has better understanding of chess. This somehow gives him right to insult FMs posting or even GMs creating lines, it is amazing but it is fact, and there is nothing to do in terms of showing truth that will make FF back down from his ridiculousness, only thing to do is ignore him and hope he is happy in his little bubble, cheers. |
|
Nov-12-11 | | DrMAL: My apology, it looked like 12...Rg8 could maybe save game in line but computer shows this to be wrong. Here is deeper computation showing how black was already lost. Houdini_20_x64: 24/81 1:11:49 47,524,080,773
-2.01 12. ... Nc6 13.Bd3 b6 14.dxe7 Nxe7 15.0-0
-2.01 12. ... b6 13.Bd3 Nc6 14.dxe7 Nxe7 15.0-0
-3.12 12. ... Rg8 13.Bd3 Nc6 14.0-0 h5 15.dxe7
-3.36 12. ... e6 13.Bd3 Nc6 14.0-0 Rg8 15.Qh6
-3.45 12. ... Qb6 13.Nb5 Nc6 14.dxe7 d5 15.Qd6
-5.21 12. ... Qc2 13.Qe3 Nc6 14.Bd3 Qb2 15.0-0
Opening line from 6...Bh6 is so sharp that only one inaccuracy (11...Qb2 instead of 11...e6) is enough to lose (it was bigger mistake than even brilliant original game J M Hodgson vs Van der Wiel, 1994 shows). Similarly, white must play 12.Qd2 to keep from having bad game, this is why <SWT> originally tried to help by correcting FF's wrong move in post/page/video that was silly of him to try LOL, cheers. |
|
Nov-12-11 | | DrMAL: As my final word on this game, kudos to <SWT> for having such great knowledge of theory, his post was very useful to me, I was familiar with game (via friend Aleksandrov) but not with theory book he mentioned, thanx! < SimonWebbsTiger: @<acirce> 11...d6 12. Qd2 Rg8! is in pretty good theoretical shape (theory runs up to around the 20 move mark in the Dembo book mentioned). The Yearbook survey concludes that it is now white on the look out for ways to strengthen 6. c4 after the critical 6...Bh6. AJ's preference of 6...Bg7 should be equal but, as Richard Palliser notes, the position is slightly easier to play for white as Tromp experts like Luke McShane and Peter Wells have shown in praxis.> <SWT> comment on 6...Bg7 was also correct of course, no one argued with FF's great ability to copy computer on this, it is just that 6...Bg7 line is not nearly as sharp as 6...Bh6 line, as another of world's best players GM Shirov can directly attest to! Great game to both admire and to learn from, cheers. |
|
Nov-13-11 | | hms123: <DrMal> got off to a rough start when he first started posting at chessgames.com, but after taking a little time off, he has come back and become one of the best and most helpful analysts. He is a valuable member of the site. |
|
Nov-13-11 | | King Death: <hms123> I've seen a lot of good stuff from <DrMAL> here and don't know anything about the rest. Right now, I'm seeing plenty of not so good things from <LIFE Master AJ> though. I don't know what to make of these personal attacks by the Life Master on some pages that seem to happen to anyone who doesn't agree with him. I'm just here to enjoy chess. |
|
Nov-13-11 | | I play the Fred: <DrMAL> has explained that another individual held the identity previously. Even <that> version of <DrMAL>, despite getting ugly and personal too often, posted a lot of useful stuff. <AJ> posts plenty of ugly and personal stuff without much useful stuff to balance it out. |
|
Nov-13-11 | | SimonWebbsTiger: actually DrMal isn't DrMal or maybe DrMal....
A student(?) uses his ID, which runs counter to the whole idea of unique user IDs on cg.com?! DrMal<I often get help from friend with posts (actually, real DrMAL who basically stopped posting in summer, he still does at times)> (posted on this page Leonid Yurtaev) |
|
Nov-13-11 | | DrMAL: <SWT> DrMAL was my student, as I posted on other pages before. I had encouraged him to post but he got upset at some on here and stopped, giving me account, he has helped me with English. I had bad impression from that when I started. Anyway, thanx for any kind words, I too am <just here to enjoy chess.> this for me includes trying to find truth. Others including <SWT> were in process of posting truth on this game and being debased by FF as well. Like others I have tried reason with him, it has never even begun to work, so I can only take FF's insults as an honor, if I found him agreeing with me, then I would have big cause to worry! Cheers. |
|
Nov-13-11 | | SimonWebbsTiger: @<DrMal>
thanks for the clarification.
I noted the fall in DrMal's English; couldn't understand why. Two people using the DrMal ident -- easy to understand why now! |
|
Nov-13-11 | | DrMAL: Thanx <SWT> for me I preferred to be on here like my friend as anonymous, it should not be necessary to tout FIDE card, person's rating does not change what they wrote in post anyway. It has been very nice so far to collaborate with you and many others on here, good for me to practice English and help share things if I can, learning some from others too in process. I do not want to attract more attention, it is not my purpose on here so let's just leave it like that, OK? Look forward to more fun kibitzing on this site, cheers. |
|
Nov-14-11 | | TheFocus: <SWT> <AJ may brag of his books - always quoting MCO 15 though! - but that doesn't change the fact that a putz with no books and a putz with loads of books is still a putz.> True. |
|
Nov-14-11 | | TheFocus: <DRMal> Because we have put up with <AJ>'s antics for so long, when the original <DRMal> was posting, there was some friction which caused me and others to give him a hard time. I do not deny my rudeness to him and would like to publicly apologize to him through you. Pass it on for me please. He did present some very good analysis, the same as you do. |
|
Nov-14-11 | | DrMAL: Thanx <TheFocus> I will pass to him in case he does not see (probably will). He bears you or others no ill-will and he often helps me with English anyway. Cat is out of bag regarding my anonymity anyway, it is easy to figure out if one really bothers to, no big secret, I just prefer to not have to answer stuff on few (mostly poor) of my games on CG site. We have all tried to reason with Florida Fischer, it is crazy for anyone to behave this way he makes no sense at all. I guess he just likes being miserable, if he had any sort of sense he would swallow false pride a bit and admit to mistakes, everyone able to read posts above can figure out truth anyway, there is nothing to hide. Look forward to more good kibitzing, cheers. |
|
Nov-14-11
 | | LIFE Master AJ: To all the critics ... <MD PrHAL> included ... #1.) Where's your web page?
#2.) Where's your video?
Is so easy to criticize ... the U.S. Marines have a motto, which I greatly admire. ("LEAD, follow, ... ... ... or get the heck out of the way!") |
|
Nov-14-11
 | | LIFE Master AJ: BTW, "MD" doesn't mean "doctor" here ... |
|
Nov-15-11 | | King Death: There's a time to say something and a time to say nothing, and <DrMAL>'s last post about covers it. I have nothing to add. |
|
Nov-15-11 | | acirce: The "funny" thing about this game is that Wells gives everything up to 12.d6 in his own book about the Trompowsky from 2003. He does give 5..Bh6 a ?! mark, and indicates a preference for White even after 11..d6, but of course theory evolves, no matter what the Goldsbys of the world think. |
|
Nov-15-11 | | SimonWebbsTiger: it would come as no surprise here if we all welcomed AJ saying: "Is that true? Wow! I didn't know that. Thanks guys for the heads up. I must re-write my webpage to incorporate this new information." Utter fantasy, of course.
AJ is right, since he is armed with the Bible, MCO-15, iggy and the nyuk,nyuk,nyuk put down. |
|
Nov-15-11 | | whiteshark: Correct me if I'm wrong, but is there a newer and stronger analysis engine than Fritz 5.32 out there? |
|
Nov-15-11 | | brankat: There is. LmAj 10.11. :-) |
|
 |
 |
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 3 OF 5 ·
Later Kibitzing> |