chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Gregory Kaidanov vs Dmitry Gurevich
USA-ch G2 (1997), Chandler, rd 4, Aug-23
Indian Game: Barczay Indian (A50)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 44 times; par: 22 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 26 more Kaidanov/D Gurevich games
sac: 17.Be4 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Games that have been used in game collections will have a section at the bottom which shows collections which include it. For more information, see "What are Game Collections?" on our Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Feb-04-18  malt: Started with 15.Be4 fe4 16.B:g7 B:g7 17.Qh5+ Kd8 18.Nf7+ Kc7 the king is dug in like an Alabama tick, then come up with

15.Qh5+ g6 16.Qh3 Rg8 17.Be4 fe4 18.Q:h7 e3 19.f3 Rg7 20.B:g7 B:g7 21.Q:g7 missed 20...Q:c5

Feb-04-18  ChessHigherCat: <goodevans: <Steve.Patzer: I still do not understand 17. Be4.> This blocks the mate threat on g2 so leaves the white Q free to abandon defensive duties and go on the attack.>

Hi good'evans, I found Be4 but on move 15 (I considered Qh5+ Qh3 first but it seemed to slow). <Playground Player> above said <I started with Be4, too, and then Bxg7 before Qh5+. It netted me a nice little attack that ran out of gas and couldn't deliver checkmate. As Samuel Johnson once said, in regard to something else, "The pleasure is transitory, and the position is ridiculous."> but s/he doesn't give the continuation.

That's exaggerated, right? I admit the game line is better but my line is winning, too, isn't it?

Feb-04-18  njchess: I got this one only because I had ♗e4 in the back of my mind as way to thwart Black's ♕xg2++. White's bishop on d4 helped me to validate ♕h5+ followed by ♗e4 effectively exchanging bishop for rook. 15. ♕h5+ g6 16. ♕h3 ♖g8 17. ♗e4! fxe4 18. ♕xh7 ♖g7 ▢? 19. ♗xg7 I'm not sure what Black does at this point, maybe ♕xc5 to reinforce the f8 bishop, but his game is pretty well over.
Feb-04-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Morning: Sigh. 4/6 with one puzzle known. Is it Monday yet?
Feb-04-18  goodevans: <ChessHigherCat> I think you're right.

The main difference seems to be that delaying the B-sac until after black has "saved" his R cuts down black's options. The early sac gives black the choice to abandon his R and instead pick up a second white minor with 15.Be4 fxe4 16.Qh5+ g6 17.Qh3 h6, though as you say white is still better, I think.

I too looked at 15.Be4 after initially abandoning 15.Qh5+. Only when I wasn't entirely happy with the immediate Be4 did it occur to me to play it as the follow up move.

Feb-04-18  ChessHigherCat: <goodevans: <ChessHigherCat> I think you're right.>

Could you repeat that a little louder please? Just kidding, thanks for the analysis! What you say about limiting the opponent's options is very true. I often give up analyzing a line with an advantage that turns into a disadvantage if you go through the trouble to analyze a few more steps, but the branches of the decision tree increase exponentially so it's much better to limit the options from the outset.

Feb-04-18  thegoodanarchist: Too many queen moves in the opening for Black.
Feb-04-18  Once: <ChessHigherCat> I opted for the immediate 15. Be4 too, after trying (and rejecting) 15. Qh5+.

Sadly, I don't think it quite works - although there's not much in it.

Here's the line played in the game: 15. Qh5+ g6 16. Qh3


click for larger view

Here Black went wrong with 16...Rg8 and his whole position fell apart. Instead Fritzie defends with 16...h6 when Black gives up his Rh8 for the white knight. Play might go 17. Nxe6 dxe6 18. Bxh8 when white has the advantage of the exchange. Fritzie is currently calling that +1.86.

Instead of this, our line is 15. Be4 fxe4 16. Qh5+ g6


click for larger view

Now we've got to move our queen out of danger, say with Qg4 or Qh3. We've sacrificed a bishop but there is no way for Black to save his Rh8. The problem is that, as goodevans has said, Black can snaffle a second white minor with either 17. Qh3 h6 or 17. Qg4 e5 18. Bxe5 Qxc5


click for larger view

White will get the Rh8 but Black will add a second minor piece to his total. So the game line wins the rook for one minor piece. Our line wins the rook for two minor pieces. Not so good.

Fritzie rates the game continuation as +1.8 and ours as +0.58. So, as you say, the game line is better but ours is also doing okay. I wouldn't quite call it winning.

The bigger point for me is that the game line is not as good as black's best defence, which means that the cute Be4 move really shouldn't have come into the equation. Which is a shame.

Feb-04-18  ChessHigherCat: <Once: I opted for the immediate 15. Be4 too, after trying (and rejecting) 15. Qh5+. Sadly, I don't think it quite works - although there's not much in it.>

Well the line I gave above (and below) certainly seems to work, what specific fault do you find with it?:

15. Be4 fxe4 16. Bxg7 Bxg7 17. Qh5+ Kd8 18. Nf7+ Kc7 19. Qe5+ Kc8 20. Nd6+ Kd8 21. Qxg7 Re8 22. Qf6+ Kc7 (Re7 23. Qf8+ Kc7 24. Qxe7 Qxc5 25. Nb5+ Kb6 26. Qd8+ Kc6 27. Qc7#) Kc7 23. Nxe8+ Kc8 24. Nd6+ Kc7 25. Qe5 Kd8 26. Rab1 Bc8 27. Qh8+ Ke7 28. Nxc8+ Kf7 29. Nd6+ Kg6 30. Rxb8

Feb-04-18  BOSTER: <ChessHigherCat>.After you gave up two bishops you can't win such pos. After 17.Qh5+ black can play Ke7 And if Qf7+ Kd8, and f7 square not free. But it is nice that you can see such long line ( 15 moves) in head.
Feb-04-18  ChessHigherCat: <BOSTER> White still wins with the line you gave: 17. Qh5+ Ke7 18. Qf7+ Kd8 19. Qxg7 Re8 20. Nf7+ Kc7 21. Nd6 Rd8 22. Qe5 Qa4 23. Nxb7+ Kxb7 24. Rab1+ Ka7 25. Qc7#
Feb-04-18  ChessHigherCat: The material doesn't matter because black's pieces are completely paralyzed. Here's an even faster mate (and some subvariants):

17. Qh5+ Ke7 18. Qf7+ Kd8 19. Qxg7 Re8

A. [19...e3? 20. Qxh8+ Kc7 21. Qe5+ Kc8 22. f3 e2 23. Rfe1 a5 24. Nf7 Na6 25. Nd6+ Kb8 26. Nb5+ Kc8 27. Qh8#]`

B. [19...d5 20. Qxh8+ Kc7 21. Qe5+ Kc8 22. Nxe6 Nd7 23. Qh8+ Nf8 24. Qxf8+ Kd7 25. Qf7+ Kc8 26. cxd5 Kb8 27. dxc6 a5 28. Qxb7#

20. Nf7+ Kc7 21. Nd6 Rd8 22. Qe5 Qa4 23. Ne8+ Kc6 24. Qd6#

Feb-04-18  stst: looks like another long wind, without any trick/tweak or real nice/super opening move. Black is on the kill by just one shot: Qxg2 and done, but it's White's move, so have to kick off with a check, for, f3 or Nf3 kind of passive, blocking the Q's diagonal d1--h5, so try this: 15.Qh5+ g6
16.Qh3 (still can defend g2, if Qf3 then exchange Q leaves White little chance) Rg8 (no other escape sq.) 17.Nxh7 Bg7 (to guard Nf6)
18.BxB RxB
19.Nf6+ Kd8
20.Qh8+ Kc7
21.f3 (defend g2) Rf7
22.Bxf5 exB
23.Nd5+ No vent for K, have to lose Q or mated QxN and Black runs out....

see how it winds up?? guess there could be a lot of other variations along the way...

Feb-04-18  stst: Oh & Huh!!
I was also thinking of blocking the diagonal where the Black Q cannot function, just miss the pivot N@g5 to harass e4, so that B goes up and Black Q cannot take, instead blocked its own P as PxB - good for White.... the Nxh7 was natural move to take some small (or could be big) advantage....whereas Be4 is more strategic.
Feb-05-18  Once: <ChessHigherCat> Your line goes 15. Be4 fxe4 16. Bxg7 Bxg7 17. Qh5+ Kd8 18. Nf7+ Kc7 19. Qe5+. This brings us to here:


click for larger view

19...Bxe5

Feb-05-18  ChessHigherCat: <Once> Your line goes 15. Be4 fxe4 16. Bxg7 Bxg7 17. Qh5+ Kd8 18. Nf7+ Kc7 19. Qe5+. Bxe5>

That was a mistake but it's hard to believe you're in good faith because I corrected it just two posts above this one with 19. Qxg7:

17. Qh5+ Ke7 18. Qf7+ Kd8 19. Qxg7 d5 20. Qxh8+ Kc7 21. Qe5+ Kc8 22. Nxe6 Nd7 23. Qh8+ Nf8 24. Qxf8+ Kd7 25. Qf7+ Kc8 26. cxd5 Kb8 27. dxc6 a5 28. Qxb7#

Feb-05-18  ChessHigherCat: Here's another version of the original line:

15. Be4 fxe4 16. Bxg7 Bxg7 17. Qh5+ Ke7 18. Qf7+ Kd8 19. Qxg7 Re8 20. Nf7+ Kc7 21. Nd6 Rd8 22. Qe5 Rf8 23. Rab1 Bc8 24. Nb5+ Kd8 25. Qg5+ Ke8 26. Nd6+ Qxd6 27. cxd6 Nc6 28. Qh5+ Kd8 29. Qxh7 Ra7 30. Rb8 Rb7 31. Qh4+ Ke8 32. Rxc8+ Nd8 33. Qe7#

Feb-05-18  Once: Sorry, that doesn't work either. After 17. Qh5+ in your line we get to here:


click for larger view

Black has three ways to escape the check: 17... Kf8 allows 18. Qf7#. Your new line of 17...Ke7 is good for white because of 18 Qf7+ followed by Qxg7 and Qxg8.

But the third line - 17...Kd8 - is a lot harder to crack:


click for larger view

White doesn't have a followup queen check. He can grab the Rh8 with the knight fork on f7, but after Bxh8 he is down three minors for a rook. Fritzie is calling this -3.8. In other words, White is down by more than a minor piece without sufficient compensation.

When we analyse a position like this, it's not enough to look at only one response by the opponent in each position. We need to analyse each possible response. So, yes, 17...Ke7 in your line leads to White having a material plus. But 17...Kd8 is a much better defence.

I feel a little bad knocking back your ideas like this. I have Fritz 15 telling me that everything after 16. Bxg7 is a loss for white. Your long lines leading to a fantasy mate on move 33 only work if black plays less than ideal moves.

It's very hard these days for humans to compete with silicon.

Feb-05-18  ChessHigherCat: <Black has three ways to escape the check: 17... Kf8 allows 18. Qf7#. Your new line of 17...Ke7 is good for white because of 18 Qf7+ followed by Qxg7 and Qxg8. But the third line - 17...Kd8 - is a lot harder to crack: White doesn't have a followup queen check. He can grab the Rh8 with the knight fork on f7, but after Bxh8 he is down three minors for a rook. >

But white doesn't care about the rook:

18. Rd8 Nf7+ and where does the king go?

Ke8 is obviously fatal.

Kc8 looks dubious at best:
18. Nf7+ Kc8 19. Nd6+ Kc7 20. Rab1 Bc8 21. Rfd1

Ke7?

18. Nf7+ Ke7 19. Nd6 Rf8 (Kd8 20. Qg5+ Kc7 21. Qxg7 Rd8 22. Qe5 ) 20. Qxh7 Qxc5 21. Qxg7+ Kxd6 22. Rfd1+ Kc6 23. Qxd7+ Kb6 24. Rab1+ Ka5 25. Qxb7

Kc7
I'm working now and don't have time to calculate this one out but I'll get back to it later

Feb-05-18  Once: I assume your "18. Rd8 Nf7+" is "17... Kd8 18. Nf7+"

Black's best move is 18...Kc7. That brings us to here:


click for larger view

Black is threatening Bxa1 and e3 (renewing the mate threat). If the white queen moves off the fifth rank, black will play Qxc5 followed by Nc6 and he is untangling his pieces.

What's more, Black is ahead in material by two bishops. The black king is fairly safe on c7 because white's c4 and c5 pawns are shielding him along the c file and white has no queenside pawn levers to open up the position.

Fritz 15 is calling this one -4.16. That's -6 for the two bishop material advantage minus one for the pawn deficit and some loose change because white's pawns are better than black's.

-4 is time to resign.

There really is no point in giving long variations without branches for moves which aren't the best for both sides.

Feb-05-18  ChessHigherCat: Okay, I will take this as a salutary sign that it's time to take a "couple-three month" break from this website.
Feb-05-18  malt: <ChessHigerCat Okay, I will take this as a salutary sign that it's time to take a "couple-three month" break from this website.>

Its a pity as this site wouldn't be half as much interesting.

Feb-05-18  morfishine: No doubt, its healthy and best to take a break from chess, from time to time
Feb-06-18  Once: <ChessHigherCat> These weekend puzzles do get very tough, particularly if you're trying to solve them without a chess program. Both sides have several different moves to choose from and the lines do get long and complicated.

So my advice is not to get too disheartened, but equally not to take on Fritz in positions like these.

Feb-21-18  ChessHigherCat: malt: <ChessHigerCat Okay, I will take this as a salutary sign that it's time to take a "couple-three month" break from this website.>

<Its a pity as this site wouldn't be half as much interesting.>

Thanks bro'! Fortunately I've never understood what a "couple-three months" means so for better or worse I'm back already.

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 3)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC