chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Loek van Wely vs Leinier Dominguez Perez
Corus (2009), Wijk aan Zee NED, rd 1, Jan-17
Gruenfeld Defense: Exchange. Modern Exchange Variation (D85)  ·  1/2-1/2
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

NOTE: You are using our new chess viewer, "Olga." For more info see the Olga Quickstart Guide. You can switch back to the old viewer (pgn4web) from the pulldown menu below. If you have questions or suggestions see our Olga chessforum.

explore this opening
find similar games 6 more Van Wely/L Dominguez games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can change the color of the light and dark squares by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page. Or, you can change it with the "SETTINGS" link in the lower right.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jan-17-09  furrer: At least the sacrifice explorer isnt showing 80. Rh4+
Jan-17-09  ruelas007: lol! <furrer>, does any have a collection named drawing sacrifices?
Jan-17-09  offtherook: Was Van Wely giving up and taking the draw, or was he really tired and actually dropped a rook for no reason?
Jan-18-09  Ipecac: <offtherook: Was Van Wely giving up and taking the draw, or was he really tired and actually dropped a rook for no reason?>

Humor was the only weapon he had left in the game, so he used it.

Jan-18-09  Confuse: Its also possible that he was low on time, and his opponent didn't want to give the draw. : 0
Jan-18-09  furrer: Is it possilbe to create a mate with N+K against K+R with the weak side winning?
Jan-18-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: <furrer> Well, it's easy enough to create such a position:


click for larger view

but forcing it would be another matter.

Jan-18-09  dakgootje: Well, the position was drawn either way, so I suspect his moves 71-80 were just hoping his opponent would be tired as well and make a mistake. I like the finish though ;)
Jan-19-09  Maynard5: What is surprising in this game is that White is not able to force the win in an endgame with a rook and three pawns against a knight and four pawns. Most such endgames on record have been won by the player with the rook. See for instance Alekhine vs. Junge, Salzburg, 1942, for an interesting example of this type of endgame. Black's defense in this position holds primarily because the pawns are blockaded, and because his pawns are more advanced. This makes it difficult for White to make any progress.
Jan-19-09  gazzawhite: <Phony Benoni> I believe that if one runs out of time, and it is possible to be checkmated (regardless of whether or not it can be forced), then they lose. I guess you already knew that though.
Jan-19-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: <gazzawhite> Yes, I know that rule, but it has never been one of my favorites. In my opinion, increments should always be used to try and avoid such situations.

And, yes, I also know the argument that a player who runs out of time deserves to lose because he should have used his time more efficiently. That has some merit--but in a seven hour game where a player's flag falls when his opponent has one second on the clock, it makes no sense.

Rules such as time limits are necessary for competitive play, but as far as possible they should not affect the result of a game which has been decided on the board. This is supposed to be chess, for goodness sakes, not Beat the Clock.

Jan-25-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: Loek van Wely and Lenier Dominguez followed a long line in a well-known Gruenfeld, with black sacrificing an exchange for a strong passed a pawn and white having a passive bishop on g3.

White might still have been better, but when black managed to exchange queens, he picked off white’s weak e pawn for his advance a pawn.

Even the rook and three pawns versus knight and four, after managing to exchange a pair of rooks, was not winnable and the competitors agreed to split the point after 64 [<??>] moves.

fm rd1 report

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collection [what is this?]
4:3||
from 47d_R:N by whiteshark


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2018, Chessgames Services LLC