chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Magnus Carlsen vs Levon Aronian
20th Amber Tournament (Rapid) (2011) (rapid), Monaco MNC, rd 3, Mar-14
Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Classical Variation. Original Defense (D78)  ·  1/2-1/2

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 215 more Carlsen/Aronian games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: The Olga viewer allows you to get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" link on the lower right.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Mar-14-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: white had three pawns for the exchange. It seems as though he should have won this game.
Mar-14-11  Hovik2009: count again!
rook and three pawns for two minor pieces, so Carlsen was lucky to get away from this.
Mar-14-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: No, Carlsen was winning, but couldn't get his material organized.
Mar-14-11  haydn20: On move 21 after the bloodletting: with R and 7 well-connected P's vs. N & B plus 4 P's, two of which are rancid, I'd rather be White. Fritz gives White +1.25.
Mar-14-11  Sleeping kitten: After move 20, Carlsen just looks better with 3 pawns and a rook for two minor pieces. I'm wondering whether he missed something or whether I'm overestimating White's advantage.
Mar-14-11  Hovik2009: run your Fritz again on move 35, if black had played 35...Nd1! he could have been winning, and again instead of 41...Bc4?, he would have played 41...Bd5, he could fare much better than draw which Carlsen took hastily after exchanging on c4.

In my opinion Carlsen was never winning after fancy but dubious 18.Nxf7?!, but before that I agree he had much better position but not obviously winning.

I know it is really hard to convince you Carlsen fans, but I tried anyway!

Mar-14-11  haydn20: 26 Be5 may be a tactical error; maybe 26 Rc5 keeps an edge. <Hovik2009> I only ran Fritz thru move 20, and was not commenting on anything after that.
Mar-14-11  haydn20: 35...Nd1; 36 Re5 Kf6; 37 Raa5 h6; 38 h4 Rc3; 39 hxg5 hxg5; 40 Rxg5 Rxa3 and Black has chances.

41...Bd5; 42 Rd4 e6; 43 Rd2 Rc1+; 44 Kf2 Nd1+; 45 Kg2 and Black is better, but winning?

From 18-25, the position is unclear until somebody finds a convincing line.

Mar-14-11  Hovik2009: <haydn20>
now that I have looked over the game again, I agree with you that 26.Be5 wasn't that strong of a move resulting in exchange of the last white minor piece, I guess White was worried about retreat of the knight to e8 hitting the rook and white's undefendable d-pawn twice in the mean time, but as you mentioned 26.Rc5 seems to refute that powerful knight move.
Mar-14-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Penguincw: Endgame Statistics:

♔♖♙♙♙ vs. ♔♖♙♙♙

A side wins 41.4% of the time.

A draw occurs 58.6% of the time.

Mar-14-11  jmboutiere: According to Rybka 3 ,after 11 moves Carlsen has + 0.69 After 14.Qb3 + 0.82
17.Qb7 + 1.18
20.Bb7 + 1.25
26.e3 + 0.90
26.Be5 - 0,03 with this move Carlsen lost, for the first time in the game his advantage.
Mar-14-11  jmboutiere: 41.Bd5 - 0.49
41.Bc4 - 0.20, the same Rybka score in the final position. I wouldn't say Aronian had a real advantage in this game. And I think it was a great fight between two grand champions.
Mar-14-11  jmboutiere: And yes I'm a Carlsen fan, but I respect Aronian too.
Mar-15-11  jmboutiere:

Magnus Carlsen`s Blog

Amber 2011, 3rd round

Two draws today. I am not going to say much about the blindfold game, cause there is not much to say. With black I arrived from the opening with a very solid position, and not much happened until the draw was agreed on move 37. The rapid game was a completely different affair. I got a very pleasant position from the opening, and soon won a pawn. I could then consolidate my extra pawn, but incredibly I went for another, more complicated continuation, which led to an imbalanced, unclear position which I had earlier though was much better for white. It was still probably better for white, but I continued to drift, even blundering two pawns in one move at some point ("quite an achievement"- Aronian). I was then lost, but contrary to my rapid game with him in 2009, where I proceed to lose a completely winning position, Aronian could not finish me of this time, and the game ended with a draw on move 37. Thus, I am still sharing the lead with Aronian with 4.5/6. Since Grischuk lost 1.5-0.5 today, he is now sharing 3rd place with Anand. Perhaps fittingly, the three highest rated players in the world are the only ones who have not lost a game yet. My opponent tomorrow is the 16 year old Giri, and I will certainly be eager to gain revenge from my dreadful (I cannot think of a nicer word :) loss against him in Wijk aan Zee earlier this year Magnus Carlsen, Monaco 14.03.2011

Mar-15-11  jmboutiere: http://www.arcticsec.no/index.php?b...
Mar-15-11  jmboutiere: Consolidating the extra pawn, I suppose, means 17.Qf3.
Mar-15-11  wordfunph: game quote..

"Which idiot spurns the possibility to get a position with a healthy extra pawn?"

- GM Magnus Carlsen

http://www.chess.co.uk/twic/chessne...

Mar-15-11  fab4: After 26.Rc5 .. 26...Nd5 still looks good for black.The Kt is still on the right circuit e3/c4 ect..

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: RAPID. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC