Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Henry Ernest Atkins vs Herbert Levi Jacobs
"Oh Henry!" (game of the day May-25-2011)
London (1915), ?
Danish Gambit: General (C21)  ·  1-0


explore this opening
find similar games 1 more H E Atkins/H Jacobs game
sac: 7.Nxc3 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can display posts in reverse order, by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page and checking the option "Display newest kibitzes on top."

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
May-25-11  carl giraffe: well this one is crazy. and a center of the rank smother mate; you don't see that every day ( I think that's the first one I've seen actually)
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: So this is what the Atkins Diet is all about. Start off with a Danish, sacrifice everything else that looks good, and watch your opponent expire from a case of clogged arteries.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: By the way, don't get too excited. The whole game is book:

F Young vs L Dore, 1892

The only innovation is that Jacobs resigned instead of taking the queen.

Young's game is almost certainly legitimate, and in any case predates this one since it was published in his <Grand Tactics of Chess> well before 1915. Google Books has an 1898 edition:

Young's introduction explains the game perfectly:

<"This game illustrates a line of mobilization by the right, combined with a complex line of manoeuvre against an objective plane located in the centre and compromised by the formation of the the minor left oblique.">

That should make everything clear.

May-25-11  lopium: lol nice Phony Benoni. So basically this game was the game of the day about 4 years ago.
May-25-11  Shams: Where would we be without the prose of Franklin Knowles Young to kick around?
May-25-11  sofouuk: <Phony Benoni> then it's not a very good book 11 ... Nb6! 12 Rxe7 Nxe7 13 Nxc7 Kf7 14 Bf4 d5 15 Nxa8 Nxa8

click for larger view

and black wins. or 13 ... Kf8! 14 Nxe7 Nxe7 15 Qf3 Bb7! 16 Qxb7 d5!

click for larger view

black wins again.

btw 13 ... fg5 was the ??

Premium Chessgames Member
  piltdown man: They don't make 'em like this no more. Sadly.
May-25-11  hasany81: I can't believe this !!!!
May-25-11  newzild: Wow. Reminds me of all the sparkling games we're getting in the candidates' matches at the moment.


Premium Chessgames Member
  The HeavenSmile: 10...0-0 and black is up two pawns
May-25-11  ROO.BOOKAROO: Another absurd game, very much in 19th-century style. No wonder that Steinitz and Lasker wanted to rid chess of such non sensical developments.
May-25-11  hedgeh0g: <10...0-0 and black is up two pawns>

11.Nxe7+ Nxe7 (Kh8 Ng6+) 12.Bxe7 Qe8 13.Bh4 looks unpleasant.

Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: Blackburne had a quote for this type of game:"A little bit of Morphy"

This sacrifice circus ends in a smothered mate! Beautiful!

May-25-11  Funicular: Im thinking 13... 0-0

what then? Nxe7+ Qxe7 Nxc6 Qc5 and white's out of options. Ne7+ simply Kh8 and it's all over. White's bishop retreats, then Rf7 forces Nxc8 and it's hopeless for black

The real question is, would i've seen 0-0 on the board? would i've been greedy and captured a piece instead?

who knows

May-25-11  Doctor Aust: The well-known chess player and author Leonard Barden, posting on the English Chess Forum today, suggests this game is almost certainly fictitious the second time (with Atkins as a participant), and possibly fictitious the first time (Young vs Dore):

Premium Chessgames Member
  Marmot PFL: Black can make his life a lot easier by playing 3...d5. White most of these attacks can <in theory> be refuted, there is still the problem of having enough time left on the clock to actually win the game, without some stupid mistake.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Marmot PFL: 13...0-0 is fine, and the greedy 13...Kf8 might be even better.

I might have played 13...Nxe5 14 Rxe5 fe 15 Bxe7 Qxe7 16 Nxe7 Kxe7 with 2 rooks and bishop for the queen, but white might <possibly> get perpetual check with 17 Qd5

Much the same is 13...fe5 14 Nxe7 Nxe7 15 Rxe5 Rf8 with more than enough for the queen.

13...fg5? was almost the only plausible way for black to lose, and he found it. For that to happen in 2 separate games is not too likely.

May-25-11  Doctor Aust: I suppose the argument is that artless acceptance of sacrifices was "the done thing" in chess earlier in the C19th - though probably not in the 1880s, let alone the C20th. In Andersen's time it was arguably considered "not quite sporting" to decline any gambit, or sacrifice.

But as Marmot alludes, lots of ways for Black NOT to lose so spectacularly.

I'm slightly reminded of online games against the low-strength settings of the computer, where you make it take the move back again and again, until eventually it makes the material-grab move you need for your sacrificial masterpiece.

May-25-11  WhiteRook48: in this game, white qualifies as insane and awesome at the same time.
May-25-11  apexin: I like the final position
a lone knight wins vs 5pieces!
May-26-11  picard: when the smothered mate occurs on the next move, black would be mated while ahead 17 pawns... is that a record for most material ahead while being mated?
Premium Chessgames Member
  NM JRousselle: Black played so poorly, I can hardly stand to play over this game. White's attack was hardly sound. Black missed several wins. For example, 13 Ne5 Ne5 14 Re5 fe5 15 Be7 Qe7 16 Ne7 Ke7 and Black has 2 rooks and a bishop vs the queen. After 17 Qd5 c6 18 Qe5, White gets a few checks, but can resign with a clear conscience.
Aug-20-12  codenameZero: My games are discovered on this website as romantic era chessgames. My name is bingjie Liu. Conquertheworld on ICC. If you don't believe me join ICC AND VIEW My games. Quite a?! Coincidence lol.
Apr-09-14  Conrad93: I still have no clue what's wrong with 11...fxg5 12. Rxc4 0-0. I thought maybe white had 13. Rxc6? dxc6 14. Nxe7, but then black just plays 15. Kh8 and I don't see any compensation for white.
Apr-09-14  Conrad93: Not one of Atkin's best games.
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
Danish Gambit (C21) 1-0 See F. Young vs L. Dore, 1892
from exd4 offers to Fredthebear by fredthebear
favorite games
by W O C E
jed44's favorite games
by jed44
hpe0415's favorite games
by hpe0415
DrChopper's good games
by DrChopper
Danish Gambit (C21) 1-0 See F. Young vs L. Dore, 1892
from 1900s Grandmasters Annointed by fredthebear
Danish Gambit (C21) 1-0 See F. Young vs L. Dore, 1892
from KP Monies - Save by fredthebear
Danish Gambit (C21) 1-0 See F. Young vs L. Dore, 1892
from Goering Gambit by TG Forney / Bonus Fredthebear by fredthebear
Danish Gambit (C21) 1-0 See F. Young vs L. Dore, 1892
from Pins Ins and Outs, All About Pins ECO C by fredthebear
Danish Gambit (C21) 1-0 See F. Young vs L. Dore, 1892
from B.O. IV Presented by FTB by fredthebear
Capoani's favorite games
by Capoani
Danish Gambit (C21) 1-0 See F. Young vs L. Dore, 1892
from Knights Add Spice IV w/Rice for Fredthebear by fredthebear
Danish Gambit (C21) 1-0 See F. Young vs L. Dore, 1892
from Fredthebear's Knight Checkmate Patterns & Traps by fredthebear
21 moves
from Chess Miniatures, Collection VI by wwall
Danish w knights
from Short n Quick 2 by jungol
a sac circus-ending in a Philidor's legacy.
from games beyond reach! by kevin86
shakman's favorite games
by shakman
Danish Gambit (C21) 1-0 See F. Young vs L. Dore, 1892
from Fredthebear Hammers the 3rd/6th Rank by fredthebear
Oh Henry! Insano!
from toso51's favorite games by toso51
Danish Gambit (C21) 1-0 See F. Young vs L. Dore, 1892
from f6 II by fredthebear
plus 10 more collections (not shown)

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2018, Chessgames Services LLC