< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
Mar-07-22
 | | MissScarlett: We're agreed that you have little to say. |
|
Mar-07-22 | | goodevans: Can I be <cg>'s resident game-of-little-interest grouch, please? (not this game, btw) |
|
Mar-07-22
 | | MissScarlett: What's the collective noun for grouches?
Alekhine vs R E Desai, 1933 |
|
Mar-07-22 | | Knightmare07: Feels good to wake up and see a pun of you.
<goodevans> it's actually not as complex as you (or others) might think.
I just thought of <Nukhim> as <Nuking>, and submitted a pun based on that. |
|
Mar-07-22
 | | OhioChessFan: <We're agreed that you have little to say.> I win. And if you don't want your pun selections to be criticized, do better! |
|
Mar-07-22 | | TheTamale: Man, we had Reshevsky, so they had to have a Rashkovsky. The Soviets copied the US whenever they could. |
|
Mar-07-22 | | Teyss: <OCF> 2 - <MS> 2. The World Sarcasm Championship final continues while us patzers watch awestruck. <OhioChessFan> MS' ways are inscrutable but maybe it is another politically charged pun about King Putin and his dreadful threats. |
|
Mar-07-22
 | | MissScarlett: <OCF> is winning; he told us so. |
|
Mar-07-22
 | | OhioChessFan: <MS> is doing a great job with puns. He told us so. |
|
Mar-07-22
 | | MissScarlett: I'm not in charge of puns, I'm in charge of <GOTD>s. Subtle difference. |
|
Mar-07-22
 | | OhioChessFan: Really? So you intended to delete thousands of puns, without informing the submitters no less, but you weren't in charge of them? |
|
Mar-07-22
 | | MissScarlett: Hundreds, not thousands. I don't have the time. But if there's no realistic prospect of pun/game submissions being used, why let them accumulate and clutter up the joint? |
|
Mar-07-22
 | | OhioChessFan: Non-responsive. You are in charge of them. |
|
Mar-07-22
 | | MissScarlett: I said I'm in charge of <GOTD>s, which implies I'm in charge of pun/game submissions. There are currently over 6,800 and counting. Even if I deleted five thousand of them, there'd be no prospect of ever running out. You make it sound like <cg> has a care of duty to every pun. |
|
Mar-07-22
 | | OhioChessFan: <I'm not in charge of puns, >, yet you felt entitled to delete thousands. |
|
Mar-07-22
 | | MissScarlett: Only the bad ones. |
|
Mar-07-22
 | | OhioChessFan: We agree that if 6000 were in the pipeline, 5000 were bad. |
|
Mar-07-22
 | | MissScarlett: Are you saying that no submission should be deleted? Or is the problem is that I'm doing so unilaterally? Or is it merely the lack of notice of deletion that you object to? |
|
Mar-07-22
 | | OhioChessFan: I am saying you claimed not to be in charge of puns, but you previously made clear you are. |
|
Mar-07-22
 | | Sally Simpson: You should not be deleting any submitted puns.
These are peoples hopes and dreams. They have been submitted in good faith and expectancy. Each one should be kept and cherished.
(and sent to the FBI for their psychiatric profilers to spot potential roof top snipers.) |
|
Mar-07-22
 | | MissScarlett: Occasionally, there will be a good pun attached to a poor/unsuitable game. Or vice versa. In which case I reserve the right to delete the submission and adopt the pun/game for my own benefit. |
|
Mar-07-22
 | | MissScarlett: <and sent to the FBI for their psychiatric profilers to spot potential roof top snipers.> <So - Deac Killer> So vs Deac, 2019 |
|
Mar-07-22 | | goodevans: Such fun!
Thanks for reminding me of Alekhine vs R E Desai, 1933, Missy. Brought a smile to my face. |
|
Mar-08-22
 | | perfidious: <Geoff....(and sent to the FBI for their psychiatric profilers to spot potential roof top snipers.)> rofl |
|
Apr-18-22
 | | PawnSac: < MissScarlett: What's the collective noun for grouches? > Grinch lol |
|
 |
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·
Later Kibitzing> |