Nana Dzagnidze vs Sopiko Guramishvili (2013) Nana From Heaven

Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players ·

Kibitzing

Nana Dzagnidze vs Sopiko Guramishvili
"Nana From Heaven" (game of the day Aug-20-2013)
European Championship (Women) (2013), Belgrade SRB, rd 5, Jul-27
English Opening: Agincourt Defense. Catalan Defense (A13) · 1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening	find similar games	2 more N Dzagnidze/S Guramishvili games
	PGN: download \| view \| print	Help: general \| java-troubleshooting

TIP: The Olga viewer allows you to get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" link on the lower right.

For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE. [CLICK HERE]

Jul-27-13		notyetagm: N Dzagnidze vs S Guramishvili, 2013 <nerwal: ... In N Dzagnidze vs S Guramishvili, 2013, black tried to checkmate white's king by giving up two pieces on g3, <<<but maybe missed an important intermezzo with Bxh3 and there was no checkmate in sight.>>> Punishment was swift.>

Jul-27-13		notyetagm: N Dzagnidze vs S Guramishvili, 2013 16 ... ♗d6xg3? <unsound sac> click for larger view 17 f2x♗g3! ▢ <clearance: f2-sq> click for larger view (VARIATION) 17 h2x♗g3? click for larger view <TODO> Figure out the difference between the <WINNING> 17 f2x♗g3! played by Dzagnidze and the losing 17 h2x♗g3? which Dzagnidze did not play. It seems that 17 f2x♗g3! wins because it creates a <FLIGHT SQUARE> for the White g1-king to go to f2. That is, 17 f2x♗g3 is a great example of the <SQUARE CLEARANCE> theme. Having the f2-sq available to the White g1-king is what makes the winning <INTERMEZZO> 18 ♗g2x♗h3! ▢ possible 17 ... ♘e4xg3 18 ♗g2x♗h3! ▢ <intermezzo> click for larger view click for larger view as White can then respond to the <DOUBLE CHECK> 18 ... ♘g3xe2++ with 19 ♔g1-f2! ▢ and the Black attack is over, leaving Black two(!!) whole pieces down for very little compensation. (VARIATION) 18 ... ♘g3-e2++ 19 ♔g1-f2! ▢ click for larger view The <POWER OF CALCULATION>.

Jul-27-13		notyetagm: N Dzagnidze vs S Guramishvili, 2013 Of course <HOUDINI 3> immediately calculates that the speculative sacrifice 16 ... ♗d6xg3? is unsound, giving it an eval of <2.10 >. Also note how <HOUDINI 3> also immediately sees that taking the other way (17 h2x♗g3?) is losing, giving that move an eval of <-2.19 >. I wonder if Guramshivili (Black) considered the enormous difference between these seemingly nearly identical recaptures. Probably not. This is a point that I have seen NM Jorge Sammur-Hasbun make over and over again in analysis sessions: it can make a huge difference whether you play 17 f2x♗g3! or 17 h2x♗g3? , even though there seems very little difference between them at first glance. Only deep <CALCULATION> reveals the truth. <CALCULATE LIKE A COMPUTER!> Dzagnidze playing White did, and she won easily as a result. ---- http://belgrade2013.liveschach.net Computerkibitz: Houdini 3 Pro x64 Depth: 20 with 302.619 kN in 110s <2.10 <<<17.fxg3>>> Bxg2 18.Kxg2 Nd6 19.h3 Qh5 20.Qd3 Nc4 21.Rxc4 dxc4 22.Qxc4 Ne7 23.e4 b5 24.Qc5 Qg6 25.Nc3 Qd6 26.Bc1 Rad8> <-2.19 <<<17.hxg3>>>> Nxg3 18.fxg3 Qxg3 19.Nh4 Qxh4 20.Bxh3 Qxh3 21.Rc3 Qh4 22.Kg2 Nxd4 23.Rh3 Qe4+ 24.Kh2 Nxe2 25.Nc5 Qf4+ 26.Kg2 d4 -13.29 17.Bxh3 Bxf2+ 18.Kh1 Qxh3 19.Rg1 Bxg1 20.Qxg1 Re6 21.Nd2 Nxd2 22.Nc3 N

Jul-27-13		notyetagm: N Dzagnidze vs S Guramishvili, 2013 Game Collection: CALCULATE LIKE A COMPUTER! OR IVANOV. SAME THING 17 f2xBg3!, zwischenzug 18 Bg2xBh3 refute unsound Black attack

Jul-27-13		notyetagm: N Dzagnidze vs S Guramishvili, 2013 17 ? click for larger view How to <RECAPTURE> on g3, with the f2-pawn or the h2-pawn? IT MAKES A HUGE DIFFERENCE!!! 17 f2x♗g3!▢ click for larger view Nana Dzagnidze was right on the money when she played the only move 17 f2x♗g3!▢ and not the <BLUNDER> 17 h2x♗g3? used in the variations below. She correctly saw that she would have the <ZWISCHENZUG> 18 ♗g2x♗h3!▢ only if she could follow up the <DOUBLE CHECK> 18 ... ♘g3xe2++ with 19 ♔g1-f2!▢ . The engine analysis below looks at the attempt to play the same <ZWISCHENZUG> idea 18 ♗g2x♗h3 but after the incorrect recapture 17 h2x♗g3?. That is, the variation under consideration is 17 h2x♗g3? ♘e4xg3 18 ♗g2x♗h3 ♘g3xe2++ shown in the diagram below. Now White loses(!) to the <DOUBLE CHECK> in this variation because she does not have the move 19 ♔g1-f2 available. 1: Nana Dzagnidze - Sopiko Guramishvili, European Individual Women's Championship 2013 (VARIATION) 17 h2x♗g3? ♘e4xg3 18 ♗g2x♗h3 ♘g3xe2++ click for larger view Analysis by Fritz 13: 1. (-5.46): 19.Kh2 Qxf3 20.Rg1 Qxf2+ 21.Rg2 Qf4+ 22.Kh1 Nxc1 23.Bxc1 Qh4 24.Kh2 Re1 25.Qd2 Nxd4 26.Qf4 Rxc1 27.Qxh4 Nf3+ 28.Kg3 Nxh4 29.Kxh4 a5 30.Nc5 Rc4+ 2. (-#5): 19.Kh1 Qxf3+ 20.Kh2 Qxf2+ 21.Bg2 Qg3+ 22.Kh1 Qh4+ 23.Bh3 Qxh3# 3. (-#1): 19.Kf1 Qxh3# (Hall, 27.07.2013)

Jul-28-13		notyetagm: N Dzagnidze vs S Guramishvili, 2013 <SUMMARY> 17 f2x♗g3!▢ wins for White because she has the click for larger view click for larger view <ZWISCHENZUG> 18 ♗g2x♗h3!▢ click for larger view and can meet the <DOUBLE CHECK> 18 ... ♘g3xe2++ with 19 ♔g1-f2!▢ . click for larger view

Aug-20-13		offramp: Those crazy Georgians!

Aug-20-13		RandomVisitor: 16...Bxg2 17.Kxg2 Qf5 was likely best, with perhaps a small advantage for black.

Aug-21-13		kevin86: I wonder if they grow peanuts there...lol

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
Nothing in violation of United States law.
No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
No trolling.
The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.