chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Henrik Pohlenz vs Marco Pinel
DVMi U15 (1994), Fredeburg, rd 2
Indian Game: West Indian Defense (E61)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games more games of H Pohlenz
sac: 15.Qg8+ PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To access more information about the players (more games, favorite openings, statistics, sometimes a biography and photograph), click their highlighted names at the top of this page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Nov-24-14  zb2cr: 15 Qg8+, Rxg8; 16. Nf7#. It's not quite the classic smothered mate, but 'tis enough, 'twill serve.
Nov-24-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  morfishine: <Once> Good points, but shouldn't the query start with 12...exd4?? allowing 13.Qxf7+
Nov-24-14  laskereshevsky: ....oh!.. C'mon....
Nov-24-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  Penguincw: Ooh. I nearly got it wrong, but when I saw the bishop on a2, I knew it would be a smothered mate (just not the typical windmill).
Nov-24-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: <Once> Nice call with the game saving 14...Ne5! I spotted it after seeing Monday's smothered mate solution 15. Qg8+ Rxg8 16. Nf7#.

Also went to Fritz to confirm 14...Ne5! as a winning alternative. Here's the result of my look at <14...♘e5! > with Fritz 12:

<14... ♘e5! 15. h4>

If 15. Qf4, then dxc3 16. bxc3 Nd3+ 17. Kf1 Nxf4 18. Nf7+ Kg8 19. Nxd8+ Nfd5 20. e4 Rxe4 21. Be3 Nc4 22. Bd4 b5 .

<15... ♖f8!>

If 15... Nxf7?, White regains the advantage after 16. Nxf7+ Kg8 17. Nxd8+ Kf8 (17... Kh8?? 18. Nf7+ Kg8 19. Nd6+ ) 18. Nb5! axb5 19. Bb4+ to

when play might continue 19...Re7 20. Rc1 c6 21. h5! g5 22. Rc5! Bf6 23. Nxc6 bxc6 24. Rxc6 Nd7 25. O-O dxe3 26. fxe3 Ke8 27. Rfc1 Bb7 28. Rxf6 Nxf6 29. Bxe7 Kxe7 30. Rc7+ Kd6 31. Rxb7 Kc6 32. Rf7 Nxh5 33. Rxh7 Ng3 34. Kf2 Ne4+ 35. Kf3 Ra4 36. Rh6+ Kc7 37. Bd5 g4+ 38. Ke2 Ng3+ 39. Kf2 Ne4+ 40. Bxe4 Rxe4 41. Ke2 .

<16. ♕b3 dxc3 17. ♗xc3 ♕e8 18. O-O ♘a4 19. ♗d4 h6 20. f4 ♘c6 21. ♗xg7+ ♔xg7 22. ♕xa4 hxg5 > Here, Fritz gives a -3.5 advantage for black (-3.53 @ 20 depth).

P.S.: As to the "philosophical question," I see nothing wrong with trying to pull off a swindle with 14. Ng5!? After all, there's no moral imperative to play the "best move," and in this case the computer choice 14. Ne2 loses to 14...Be6! 15. Bxe6 Re8 .

Nov-24-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: < morfishine: <Once> Good points, but shouldn't the query start with 12...exd4?? allowing 13.Qxf7+> Perhaps it should be 12. Qb3?? exd4!!, since 13. Qxf7+ Kh8 wins with best play.
Nov-24-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  Nightsurfer: The motive of the smothered checkmate in this game here, namely by the help of a Bishop that supports the Queen - <15.Qg8+!! Rxg8 16.Nf7#> and <1-0> - , is a replay of a similar motive that has been demonstrated at the end of the game T Peine vs V Budde, 1970 just 24 years ago in <Uelzen, Germany, 1970>.
Nov-24-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: Smothered mate...decoy

The rook is lured fron f8 and the knight comes in at f7 to mate.

Nov-24-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  Once: <morfishine: <Once> Good points, but shouldn't the query start with 12...exd4?? allowing 13.Qxf7+>

12...exd4 is a tricky move. Fritzie calls it as black's best move after 12. Qb3, with an evaluation of -1 plus scraps.

The point is that after 13. Qxf7+ Kh8 ...


click for larger view

... white's attack ought to have come to an end. He now has to do something about his attacked knight. Black has the better development.

In fact, as Patzer2 says, Fritz calls 12. Qb3 a mistake which turns a roughly level position into a strong position for black.

But ... the lure of Qb3-Qxf7+ is strong. It certainly looks as if it ought to be good for white and I suspect I would have wanted to play it too.

With a cool head and a cold heart, silicon doesn't get so excited about 13. Qxf7+ or 12. Qb3 and does like 12...exd4.

I don't think I would have seen that over the board!

Nov-24-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  chrisowen: At oomph g8 smothered mate woah nip in the g5.

I bud ignoble mission g8 as scriptures aid in duty ramble give dumb bill e5 should have lean spotted instead f8 an dangle f7 up puzzle rotates around sugar field cane mind e5 bamboo mister alight f7 station g8 back.

Sac foot rail line mush skim buds hook line and sinker ala show boat e5 mitigate and eminated across hive g5 etc able wire bus looks threatening but shallow in manage tow a eg pea wig blip g5 swindle e8 out of sorts

f8 age any og hurt in said page cage flow
at cog flinch gg if figgy pudding gig a2

bite in ever feed vow in ball to aorta heart pump g5 an good yo divide and conquer g8 vida ok flailing lade eline to rest dead for one on flight aim cred a guffaw in ear arm good game at cad i delve a do have oomph rested it now in bid at he up ad hoc in het up cuffed in fly am bishop "blasting photon bombs from the arm like galvatron" evermore

a culpa in f8 drift duos dries up in wool it ok in ogle e5 monkey trap doesnt work erm then black in ascendancy another bind smoke black knight covers the treat square f7 for smother g8 band in aid afraid a dips 14...Rf8 vocal box an a doosie f8 bango strings it olive branch over dressed g8 back on in jails have oh be one block over oh brave man band job blown jangled in just alimony balled it fatefuls in furnish a dress in forceful crum pivot to able bishop backs up ply in light feelings and fetching flippant rook foxtrots over ignoble mid catch in om fountain pours over e5 havent the foggiest if light still at the bishop.

Races flunking h8 out of trouble forages safe in huffle hoof effect off he goes heffalump stuff head in da ok nod frighten path a boggle bale at f7 lush box brave in bow balance h8 a king flush him out knock on a cycle op at rain a parade at in a ford 14...Ne5 bivouac climbing mouse house an douse petrol over e5 joust away my fine g5 not so good job at hand long may your big jib draw e5 coin o a2 phrase kind of obaloinknent funkgetulas right roll g5 of tongue the barrell loin e5 cast a good catch you knower f7 ker plunks f7 bodge jobs g6 eline dance ever nead easts the inclusive way an a2 i have erstwhile ebbs e5 and flows e5 other choice thought at burning g8 effigy rate e5 eggs on etch e5 around i net a point black ecumen i a2 grave falls in line a hive interpret elegy emory board it ardent in arms vows e5 errand boy essay round the houses f7 heads up het up heave at eh heavy nellies up neptune g8 a necktie f8 drawn on at newings the pasture g8 nestles in an exodus at wave over netters and man am inegates g8 nearlys the point evers the call enter the centre bus camp band job at have spark it better glide a2 ave bishop i a2 cram in at eline in bug a deed as boot ie f7 at check h8 escapes to the corner scythe f7 away to hades and back have in on g5 up ply in finishes the point a foots 15.Qg8+ to focus again focal offer up tour float his boat foam at the mouth manage have over off a2 die key f7 in forced a line feed fond you said inkling g8 a foilable mission h8 off flow rents a fob off in cannon fodder over fog of war flock in together flop g6 eline fop over time rich at forages g8 again flossed up out fox him leg a1 ghosting gangway style walks the plank it ok in over stripe again effect i garrelous and garnered like a bishop garibaldi gives you heebee geebees right rook bad f8 alive no more in a2 backs up g8 enough enter he get rough toe bishop a price i see ever ignoble it either on black in eyes e6 again eider down back swan g5 whos to say black might win if over the portcullis it down in dowry a2 ply behind a g8 learned gashings blown gaskets g8 get-aways to gestates in germane famile at glistens the blade in the snow gibbering gumtion am goreings and gumballs am gang e5 seem betters hoof and gg a king hog-tied ha general saving question of a fashion as time hope in bash ghoul gab hush ha blanch bag hinch a lush e5 lift good enough for a plus i never 15 ...Rxg8 16.Nf7#

Nov-24-14  BOSTER: <Once: the difficult philosophical question...was 14.Ng5 a good move or not?>.

<patzer2: I see nothing wrong with trying to pull off a swindle with 14.Ng5>.

I believe that 14.Ng5 was simple a blunder. As a chess player you must to look all opponent's respond, at least to see the pos. half move ahead.

I don't want to be offensive, but if <patzer2> can not understand it-this is his problem.

And I want to add. Sometimes <CG> give us the POTD, where to reach such pos. the player made the rude mistake and then won the game. This is not very good for educational goals, because it creates an illusion that you can go wrong way but come to Rome.

Nov-24-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: <Boster> So if 14. Ng5 is a blunder, what's the better alternative? Fritz gives 14. Ne2, which loses to 14...Be6! 15. Bxe6 Rf8 .

So in this case where the position is clearly lost with the "best move" 14. Ne2, why should it be considered a "blunder" to go for a swindle with 14. Ng5!? After all, it worked in this game.

Nov-24-14  David2009: Let's rewind to move 12.


click for larger view

(H Pohlenz vs M Pinel 1994 12?) After 12.Qb3 what should Black have played to avoid the disaster in the game?

This is an interesting problem in accurate defence - congratulations if you can solve it without an engine!

PS- I couldn't - but the right answer liws buried in the kibitzing.

Nov-24-14  Dr. J: <BOSTER I don't want to be offensive, but if <patzer2> can not understand it-this is his problem.>

BOSTER, I have crossed analytic swords with patzer2 before, and he is skilled and thorough. In this case, he is clearly saying that IN A LOST POSITION he sees nothing wrong with trying a one-move swindle, as anything beyond a superficial reading shows.

If you don't want to be offensive, don't say offensive things.

Nov-24-14  starry2013: Like others I didn't see the bishop within the first few seconds, but once I saw it the possibility of Queen sacrifice opened up.
Nov-24-14  Sniffles: Did anyone work on 14... Qf6? 15 QxQ BxQ and position gained. 15 Qb3 not viable.
Nov-24-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  Once: <BOSTER> You are missing the point.

In this game white embarks on a faulty plan. The idea of Qb3-Qxf7+ is superficially attractive but it leaves too many pieces en prise. With accurate defence black should have won.

By the time that we get to 13...Kh8


click for larger view

... white has the choice between a passive knight retreat (Ne2, Nb1, Nd1), a speculative knight advance (14. Nd5) or the aggressive (14. Ng5).

14. Ng5 indirectly protects the Nc3, as 14...dxc3 allows the same smothered mate as in the POTD solution.

None of white's available moves are great for him. As Patzer2 says, 14. Ne2 is the best of the bunch, but even this scores only -1.something.

14. Ng5 is around about a pawn worse than 14. Ne2, but it gives black more problems to think about. It also gives black a chance to go wrong, which he cheerfully accepts.

This then gives white a choice. Does he play the objectively best move in 14. Ne2 and allow black the chance to counter attack? Or does he play the swindle with 14. Ng5 - which might not be the strongest move but gives black plenty of chances to go wrong?

This boils down to a matter of taste or playing style. Some players will play the best move even though it is passive, hoping to turn around the position later on. Such a player might argue that 14. Ne2 is only -1.2 (ish). That's not yet terminal.

A more adventurous player might play 14. Ng5, particularly if he believes that his opponent won't spot the best reply.

It's the difference between Karpov and Tal, Petrosian and Alekhine.

Far, far more complicated than "simple a blunder." You would do well to read Patzer2's analysis instead of trying to be offensive about it.

Nov-24-14  BOSTER: < Once >. l've read <patzer2 > analysis. Every risk should be estimated ,what is at stake . I'd play 14.Nd1 and if Be6 15.Qf4.
Nov-24-14  1stboard: Black on move 12 should have played Be6 ....
Nov-24-14  BOSTER: < patzer2>. My apology.
Nov-24-14  Nullifidian: 15. ♕g8+ ♖xg8 16. ♘f7#
Nov-24-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: <Boster> Thanks! No offense taken. When I was an active player, I was known for always trying for the objective but elusive "best move."

So I understand where you are coming from in the discussion about less than the best move "swindle" attempts.

By the way I like your 14. Nd1!? try for complications, even if "best play" leaves it lost. Here's a look with Fritz 12:

<14. Nd1 Be6 15. Qf4> 15...dxe3! (-4.44 @ 20/44 depth)

when play might continue 16. fxe3 Bxa2 17. Rxa2 Qd3 18. Ra1 Rad8 19. Nf2 Qb5 20. a4 Qxb2 21. O-O Ne5! 22. Ne4 Rf8 23. Qg5 Nxf3+ 24. gxf3 Rxd2 25. Nxd2 Qxd2 26. Rad1 Qe2 27. Rfe1 Qxf3 28. Rf1 Qxh3 29. Rxf8+ Bxf8 30. Rd8 Kg7 31. Qe5+ Kg8 32. Qe4 Qf5 33. Qxf5 gxf5 34. Rb8 Nxa4 35. Rxb7 Bd6

Nov-25-14  RookFile: I wonder if the two players in this game even play chess anymore. It would probably surprise them to see this game being discussed here.
Nov-25-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  Once: <BOSTER> 14. Nd1 Be6 15. Qf4 gives white a worse position than 14. Ng5. White is being driven into a passive position while black's pieces are becoming more active. White will also have to do something about his uncastled king, his knight on the back rank and the threat of dxe3 exposing the Re8's attack on the black king.

White faces a long game with the grim prospect of a steadily worsening position. I have an older version of Fritz than Patzer2 - my version is giving an evaluation of -3.08 after either 15...Bax2 or 15...dxe3. I can well believe that Patzer2's Fritz is showing an evaluation of the wrong side of -4 after a deeper analysis.

And with 14. Nd1 white no longer has the swindle attempt that he would have with 14. Ng5.

That's why 14. Ng5 is interesting. It might not be the best move, but it won the game almost immediately. It is a case of playing the man and not the board.

On a more general note, when someone with the experience of Patzer2 says something, I start from the presumption that he is probably right. And on the rare occasions when I do disagree with him, I will try to do that in a sympathetic, friendly and non-challenging way.

Something for you to think about, hmm?

Nov-25-14  BOSTER: <Once > : Ng5 . Such move is called " Dirty trick".
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
15.? (Monday, November 24)
from Puzzle of the Day 2014 by Phony Benoni
15.? (November 24, 2014)
from Monday Puzzles, 2011-2017 by Phony Benoni
add decoy to SM
from smothered mates by kevin86


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2018, Chessgames Services LLC