chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Magnus Carlsen vs Hikaru Nakamura
"Nak Off" (game of the day Jul-18-2019)
GCT Croatia (2019), Zagreb CRO, rd 6, Jul-01
Queen's Gambit Declined: Harrwitz Attack. Main Line (D37)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 123 more Carlsen/Nakamura games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To flip the board (so black is on the bottom) press the "I" key on your keyboard.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jul-01-19  Dave12: I don't fully understand what happened here.
It seems that Naka planned a very nice tactical sequence with 17..Nd4 but failed to see the move 24.Bxg7.
Jul-01-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eyal: <It seems that Naka planned a very nice tactical sequence with 17..Nd4 but failed to see the move 24.Bxg7.>

According to what Carlsen told Maurice Ashley in the post-game interview (based on a short conversation the players had after the game), what Nakamura missed when he played 21...Rec8?? was the possibility of 22...Bxb3 23.Nd5! with an attack on both black bishops; after 22.Qb2! Black was completely busted in any case.

According to engine analysis, 17...Nd4 wasn't such a great idea for Black in the first place because down the forcing line that follows 21.Qe2! should give White a significant advantage. Instead, after Carlsen's 21.Rd3, 21...Bf6! more or less equalizes (though the position remains complicated) - but Rec8, as mentioned, was a losing blunder.

Jul-01-19  JustAnotherMaster: DAMN!
Jul-01-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: < Eyal: ... - but Rec8, as mentioned, was a losing blunder.>

It's difficult to foresee that it loses. Obviously, since a world-class GM didn't see it.

But it does leave Black's dark-square bishop unprotected, and "LPDO" - loose pieces drop off.

No matter what, this was a fun fun fun game to play through!

Jul-01-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  parmetd: It might be time for Naka to hang up the QGD.
Jul-02-19  csmath: Having a dozen pieces all in the tactics is really hard to see all and control all. One really has to be very, very concentrated. This position after 22 moves looks like a good homework to study, it is one awful mess on the board.
Jul-02-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: Instead of 17...Nd4? 18. Bxd4! +- (+0.83 @ 25 ply, Stockfish 9) with a strong White initiative, 17...Qc7 = (+0.08 @ 31 ply, Stockfish 9) appears to equalize.
Jul-02-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: <Eyal> is correct! Instead of 21...Rec8? 22. Qb2 ± (+1.19 @ 33 ply, Stockfish 9 analysis of move 22...?) with a strong White advantage, 21...Bf6! = (+0.07 @ 31 ply, Stockfish 9 analysis of move 21...?) equalizes.
Jul-02-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  beenthere240: I fail to see that 17...Nd4 is a blunder. Against most players (and many GMs) it might very well win. The opportunity to play 17...Qe7 is not what draws people to chess.
Jul-02-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: <beenthere240> I'd say 17...Nd4? 18. Bxd4! ± is a mistake, but not a blunder like 17...a6?? 18. Qb3 +-.

The reason 17...Nd4? is a mistake, albeit a high level mistake for a Super GM attempting to win or draw against Carlsen, is White gains a significant advantage after 18. Bxd4! Rxc4 19. Bxe5 Ba4 20. b3 Nxe4 21. Qe2! ± (+1.20 @ 18 ply, Stockfish 9 analysis of move 21...?).

In the actual game, Carlsen let Nakamura off the hook with 21. Rd3? which allows 21...Bf6 =.

Nakamura's likely decisive mistake, as noted by <Eyal>, was playing 21...Rec8? (instead of 21...Bf6! =) which allows 22. Qb2! ± (+1.19 @ 33 ply, Stockfish 9 analysis of move 22...?).

Jul-02-19  Ulhumbrus: If the advance 16 e4 counts as a threat one alternative to 15...Rac8 is 15...Rfd8 so that on 16 e4 Be8 clears d7 for the N on f6 without disconnecting the rooks
Jul-02-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  Check It Out: 30.Nd5


click for larger view

You can just hear the knight thinking, OMG, e7, the Valhalla of squares if I can make it...

Jul-18-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  Pyrandus: Buona sera.
"Harrwitz Attack"?
Jul-19-19  Ironmanth: Super intense game! Thanks, chessgames.
Jul-26-19  cormier: 17... Nd4? 17...Qc7 18.Qb3 Nd8 19.Nd5 Qxc4 20.Nxf6+ Bxf6 21.Qxc4 = +0.08 (31 ply) 18. Bd4 + / = +0.90 (33 ply)
Jul-26-19  cormier: ..... done
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
98_D37 QGD w/ 5.Bf4 (aka Harrwitz Attack)
by whiteshark
24.Bxg7
from 70d_middlegame SACS on g7 (of g2) by whiteshark
July 18: Nak Off
from Game of the Day 2019 by Phony Benoni


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC