|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 459 OF 459 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
Feb-15-26
 | | Susan Freeman: <Messiah> You DO realize that your posting restrictions are nothing personal. You are limited in the number of posts you can *flood the site* with , and this is directly related to the number of members who have you on ignore. It's automatic and was set up bu Daniel. I think it's genius. :) Thank you for the kind words about Daniel. |
|
| Feb-15-26 | | stone free or die: <Suzz> called it "bickering", but as is oft the case, it wasn't. I really was trying to offer you some sound advice <Messiah>. Now I don't think it will stick, but I saved the messages and will repost the advice. Try to at least read through it once. They'll be in a follow-up message. But first...
Your collection is still here - despite what <Suzz> said. It should be slated for deletion, and may in fact already be submitted as a task to <steve>. Game Collection: stone free or die is a malicious SOCKPUPPET I did learn something looking at its single commentary: <and should go AWAY like his owner, perfy.> This might expect some of your vinegar...
[<CG> please follow up with your word as concerns this collection] * * * * *
But I'm not a sock of <perf> at all. In fact, he and I sometimes dust it up over at <Doll>. Only <bippie> would push a charade that far! (I often mock <perf>'s listings on <Doll>, or as some might say, spin new thread from his old yarns) Given that our writing styles are so clearly distinguishable, it almost beggars belief you'd think I'm a sock of <perf>. But it does explain your behavior, especially your recent behavior towards me. |
|
| Feb-15-26 | | stone free or die: My advice to <Messiah> will follow in the next post - but note that he's restricted to a certain number of posts/day and decides to spend all of them harassing me. I have a personal stake, and I believe <CG> has the obligation, to end this harassment. And, for the record, I'll state once again that <Daniel> would never allow such personal attacks and stalking. |
|
| Feb-15-26 | | Messiah: Also, why did you censor my completely ontopic kibitzing from that King's Gambit Accepted game earlier? Now good luck to me to find that game once again. |
|
| Feb-15-26 | | stone free or die: <Messy> what exactly do you think you're going to accomplish? Neither <perf> nor me are going to get banned. (Fact - <Daniel> never banned me, not even once. Only the current regime, and only because they're basically confused.) You're on a restricted number of posts/day and you choose to make the above post, which is hysterical and ineffective. You've already done the exact same just a few days ago, and a few days before that, and a few days ... All for nought.
Why don't you go back to targeting Carlsen's losses, or perhaps make a chessic post, or join in a friendly community exchange? Or are you determined to squander your every post here? . |
|
| Feb-15-26 | | stone free or die: And, in defense of a long-term <CG> member who never attacks anyone: * * * * *
<Messy> - I've also tried to explain to you that this poster: J Sunye Neto vs J A Gandolfi, 1991 isn't attacking anyone, nor is wasting anyone's time. The ignore feature fits perfectly there.
If you don't like his contributions, turn them off, and neither you nor him will be any the worst. The reason I can't use the ignore-feature with you is that you're stalking me from forum to forum and basically leaving a trail of droppings behind all my posts. I could ignore you, but others might not. And it's not fair to me, especially as your sole purpose is to harass and offer zero, and I do mean zero, content. Plus you spread mischaracterizations - I'm not a sock puppet, just an alias. You're not the first to make personal grievances into a crusade, another did as well - even, (mis-)using chess collections to attack <CG> users, as you have recently done. <Daniel> would never have tolerated that. To strip it down to the core - can you even articulate a clear criticism? I don't think you can, you have an axe to grind, and no restraint on your determination to harass. . |
|
| Feb-15-26 | | stone free or die: PS - If <Messy> can use <striptease> for me, then I insist on using <tertiary> for him. . |
|
| Feb-15-26 | | stone free or die: <Suzz> well, I tried. I'm sure all the above will get deleted again. But you'd be doing <Messiah> a favor if you called out his stalking directly, and not hide behind an algorithm. I really think someone who understood the community would be clear about this, and it would be helpful to the person actually. |
|
| Feb-15-26 | | Messiah: <Susan> what's up? I cannot see the real violators facing consequences. Do you need any help in it? |
|
| Feb-15-26 | | Messiah: Oh, and once again: why did you censor my perfectly ontopic and chess related kibitzing from that wild KGA earlier this day? Hm?
How come that you censor uninhibitedly whatever I post, but you never stop and penalize the PERSONAL attacks against me? |
|
Feb-15-26
| | Susan Freeman: OK. the nicknames are driving me crazy. Who is striptease, etc?
You all sound like a bunch of ole ladies, or kindergartners, I haven't decided which.
It's Sunday. Give it a rest. |
|
Feb-15-26
 | | MissScarlett: Do you know if the number/nature of ads for non-premium members has increased of late? Is there the facility to manage their number? |
|
Feb-15-26
| | Susan Freeman: <MissS> ads have decreased lately. CG is in transition of providers. Curious why you ask. |
|
Feb-15-26
| | Susan Freeman: Yes, CG keeps close monitoring of ad clicks. |
|
Feb-15-26
| | Susan Freeman: when CG is not supervising the conflict between certain members, of course. |
|
Feb-15-26
| | MissScarlett: A poster somewhat prone to hyperbole claimed things were getting worse in that regard. |
|
| Feb-15-26 | | stone free or die: <<Suzz> You all sound like a bunch of ole ladies, or kindergartners, I haven't decided which.> If <Suzz>, <Messiah> and me are in a room there'd be little doubt who the <ole lady> is! I think I should start giving <Suzz> the same treatment <Messiah> is giving me, and see how long it takes for her to say ça suffit! . |
|
| Feb-15-26 | | stone free or die: <MissScarlett: Do you know if the number/nature of ads for non-premium members has increased of late? Is there the facility to manage their number?> Sad case of surrogating.
(Though I do wonder whose number <Missy> wants managing - the ads or the non-premium members?!?) |
|
| Feb-16-26 | | stone free or die: <<sfod> I think I should start giving <Suzz> the same treatment <Messiah> is giving me, and see how long it takes for her to say ça suffit!> Wonder if this simple point got across?
Naturally I hope so, but I'll assume so long as Game Collection: stone free or die is a malicious SOCKPUPPET exists it hasn't.
Will <CG> give an indication at least of when/if this collection gets scrubbed? . |
|
Feb-17-26
| | Susan Freeman: Steve knows. |
|
Feb-17-26
 | | Check It Out: Im seeing ads. |
|
Feb-17-26
| | Susan Freeman: <CIO> You should not be seeing ads. Have you blocked them? |
|
Feb-17-26
 | | WannaBe: I don't see any ads on my laptop (Win11/Chrome) but about 2 days ago I started seeing them on my Samsung Galaxy (Android/Chrome) phone. I just logged out and back in on the phone, home page comes up normal (no ads), then ads just start to fill the screen. And I think this is only happening on the home page. (Could be wrong) Hope this helps. |
|
Feb-17-26
| | Check It Out: <SF> Yes, I always have blocked them. This is something that has only happened for the last day or so, and only on my Samsung Android phone as mentioned by <WannaBe>. |
|
Feb-18-26
| | Susan Freeman: Well, guys. Thank you for bringing this to our attention. Apologies for the inconvenience. The only thing I can think of is that CG is in the process of changing ad companies, and perhaps the filter has not been set up properly? Please let us know if this continues.
Hopefully it will be gone in a day.
Thank you for your patience. |
|
 |
|
|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 459 OF 459 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
Kibitzing
