page 1 of 7; games 1-25 of 168 |
     |
 |
Game |
| Result | Moves |
Year | Event/Locale | Opening |
1. Giri vs V Artemiev |
| ½-½ | 69 | 2017 | Russian Team Championship | B42 Sicilian, Kan |
2. Kamsky vs Nepomniachtchi |
 | ½-½ | 106 | 2017 | Russian Team Championship | D02 Queen's Pawn Game |
3. Grischuk vs A Timofeev |
 | 1-0 | 30 | 2017 | Russian Team Championship | B43 Sicilian, Kan, 5.Nc3 |
4. R Hasangatin vs D Andreikin |
| 0-1 | 37 | 2017 | Russian Team Championship | B51 Sicilian, Canal-Sokolsky (Rossolimo) Attack |
5. A Korobov vs R Faizrakhmanov |
| 1-0 | 44 | 2017 | Russian Team Championship | E32 Nimzo-Indian, Classical |
6. R Makhmutov vs Khismatullin |
| ½-½ | 30 | 2017 | Russian Team Championship | D30 Queen's Gambit Declined |
7. Shirov vs I Rozum |
 | 0-1 | 61 | 2017 | Russian Team Championship | B12 Caro-Kann Defense |
8. A Shomoev vs A Riazantsev |
| ½-½ | 32 | 2017 | Russian Team Championship | B18 Caro-Kann, Classical |
9. Rublevsky vs A Esipenko |
| ½-½ | 47 | 2017 | Russian Team Championship | C45 Scotch Game |
10. D Bocharov vs Motylev |
| ½-½ | 61 | 2017 | Russian Team Championship | A06 Reti Opening |
11. Kovalenko vs M Chigaev |
| ½-½ | 44 | 2017 | Russian Team Championship | D02 Queen's Pawn Game |
12. A Zabotin vs I Lysyj |
| 0-1 | 52 | 2017 | Russian Team Championship | E10 Queen's Pawn Game |
13. Svidler vs E Romanov |
 | 1-0 | 56 | 2017 | Russian Team Championship | C78 Ruy Lopez |
14. E Alekseev vs M Matlakov |
| 1-0 | 49 | 2017 | Russian Team Championship | D02 Queen's Pawn Game |
15. M Rodshtein vs K Alekseenko |
 | 1-0 | 34 | 2017 | Russian Team Championship | D20 Queen's Gambit Accepted |
16. V Usmanov vs V Fedoseev |
| 0-1 | 28 | 2017 | Russian Team Championship | A27 English, Three Knights System |
17. I Khairullin vs A Saveliev |
| ½-½ | 68 | 2017 | Russian Team Championship | B43 Sicilian, Kan, 5.Nc3 |
18. G Palchun vs A Goganov |
 | 1-0 | 51 | 2017 | Russian Team Championship | D02 Queen's Pawn Game |
19. V Malakhov vs A Predke |
| ½-½ | 43 | 2017 | Russian Team Championship | C55 Two Knights Defense |
20. J Geller vs Zvjaginsev |
| ½-½ | 41 | 2017 | Russian Team Championship | B09 Pirc, Austrian Attack |
21. Dubov vs S Elistratov |
 | 1-0 | 25 | 2017 | Russian Team Championship | A29 English, Four Knights, Kingside Fianchetto |
22. A Mokshanov vs I Popov |
| ½-½ | 65 | 2017 | Russian Team Championship | B30 Sicilian |
23. G Oparin vs P Palachev |
| ½-½ | 47 | 2017 | Russian Team Championship | A07 King's Indian Attack |
24. P Natacheev vs M Vavulin |
 | 0-1 | 31 | 2017 | Russian Team Championship | B06 Robatsch |
25. V Artemiev vs A Predke |
 | 1-0 | 65 | 2017 | Russian Team Championship | A20 English |
 |
page 1 of 7; games 1-25 of 168 |
     |
|

|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 2 OF 3 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
May-04-17
 | | beatgiant: <Pedro Fernandez>
In the US at least, citizenship is not required for participation in the national championship. Are you sure it is for the Netherlands? |
|
May-04-17
 | | beatgiant: <nok>
Giri's father is Nepali, so he may have had a claim to that nationality as a child. But I understand Nepal does not permit dual citizenship for adults. |
|
May-04-17
 | | beatgiant: I checked out anishgiri.nl, where it describes him as <a Russian citizen with Nepalese origin> who <has been representing the Netherlands in chess arena>. We should move any further discussion of the question to the Anish Giri page. |
|
May-04-17 | | SometimesGood: <beatgiant: <Fischer had only one citizenship> If I'm not mistaken, he had dual Icelandic and U.S. citizenship in the last years of his life.> Wow, that's definitely not true! It was in Fischer's nature, to fight against injustice. This fight led him to renounce US citizenship. A real fighter and warrior for justice! RIF man! Rest in fight! |
|
May-05-17
 | | beatgiant: <SometimesGood>
Fischer did write a letter attempting to renounce his U.S. citizenship. For this to have legal effect, the U.S. would have to recognize it, which would require an in-person interview with a U.S. official who would have to make a determination that the renunciation was voluntary and intentional. Are you saying you believe that did happen? |
|
May-05-17 | | Appaz: Mamedyarov has been on fire lately. First his convincing win in Gasimov and now three straight in this competition, giving him 2792.7 and a 7th place on the live rating list. Decent opponents (live rating now): Riazantsev (2659), Vitiugov (2731) and Najer (2682). Mamedyarov is well known to be one of the deadliest super GMs against players below the absolute top, so the key to his recent success in the rankings must be a better score against his contemporaries in Gasimov. |
|
May-05-17 | | sonia91: Vladimir Fedoseev, winner of the Aeroflot Open (2017), finally crosses 2700 in the live ratings after beating Igor Kovalenko. After 4 rounds out of 7, team Siberia (Kramnik, Mamedyarov, Giri, Nepomniachtchi, Grischuk, Andreikin, Korobov, Khismatullin) is leading with a full score of 8/8. Defending champion Mednyi Vsadnyk of St. Petersburg (Svidler, Vitiugov, Matlakov, Rodshtein, Fedoseev, Khairullin, Goganov) is fourth with 4/8. |
|
May-05-17 | | savagerules: In Round 4, Anatoly Karpov made an appearance, playing white against Peter Svidler. It was an exchange Grunfeld and ended in a draw after 50 moves or so. Not bad for the old champ. |
|
May-06-17 | | JimNorCal: Spoiler alert.
When it gets published here be sure to check out round 4, Grischuk vs Grachev.
Move 34 is pleasing and startling. |
|
May-06-17 | | botvinnik64: JimNorCal:
I believe all the games (so far) are on Chess24.com
Move 34 was sweet - thanks for the head's up! |
|
May-06-17 | | JimNorCal: Yes, chess24 is where I saw it too. I like their tournament coverage, of course. I enjoy CG especially for chess history. Some of our commenters are quite excellent, as well. |
|
May-06-17 | | Pedro Fernandez: << JimNorCal>: Yes, chess24 is where I saw it too. I like their tournament coverage, of course.
I enjoy CG especially for chess history. Some of our commenters are quite excellent, as well.> And we have a good Team too, <Jim>! |
|
May-07-17 | | Pedro Fernandez: Quite interesting the game Artemiev-Romanov (round 4), where after 1.d4 the white don't play 'c4' nor the black 'd5'. Let's see: 1.d4 Nf6 2.Nf3 e6 3.Bg5 c5 4.e3 h6 5.Bh4 b6 <(a kind of hybrid of Queen's Indian, I think)> 6.Nbd2!? <(well, c-pawn still has not been moved)> 6...Bb7 7.Bd3 Be7 8.0-0 0-0 9.c3!? <(not bad, giving to d3-bishop more possibilities)>, and now 9...d6, clearly a computer move, and in my opinion the whole approach of this opening is pure computer. Why not 9... d5?
 click for larger view
After of 10.Ne5 Nc6 11.Ndf3 Na5!
 click for larger view
with a solid game for black. |
|
May-07-17 | | Nerwal: <1.d4 the white don't play 'c4' nor the black 'd5'. (...) and now 9...d6, clearly a computer move, and in my opinion the whole approach of this opening is pure computer> It's just a standard setup in the Torre Attack (Saemisch vs P F Johner, 1926 being an early example). |
|
May-07-17 | | nok: I guess 11.f4 would be more typical. |
|
May-07-17 | | JimNorCal: <PedroF> "And we have a good Team too," Team as in HaplessGM vs TeamCG? Yes, some of those GM vs World match ups sponsored by CG have been incredible. |
|
May-07-17 | | Pedro Fernandez: Thanks <Nerwal>, I didn't know about that game. Certainly I suspected that the Artemiev-Romanov already had been played. Nevertheless I think computers have reviewed such kind of games. I mean, I doubt Alekhine or Fischer, say, would have played 9...d6. Just my opinion. |
|
May-07-17 | | Pedro Fernandez: <<nok>: I guess 11.f4 would be more typical.> Yeah <Nok>, your move is interesting. Maybe Artemiev was expecting the exchange of knights on 'e5'. But, 11...Nxe5 12.fxe5 is not bad for white. Greetings.
 click for larger view |
|
May-07-17 | | Pedro Fernandez: Hey <Nerwal>, viewing the Saemisch-Johner, '...d6' is perfectly justifiable since the white knight is not on e5-square. Of course, I know what you meant: it is the same opening. |
|
May-07-17 | | Nerwal: <Nevertheless I think computers have reviewed such kind of games. I mean, I doubt Alekhine or Fischer, say, would have played 9...d6. Just my opinion.> Janowski vs Alekhine, 1914 (other sources have the move order as 6. ♘bd2 c5 7. c3 ♗e7 8. ♗d3 d6 9. 0-0 0-0 reaching the exact position) |
|
May-07-17 | | ambongtumbong: GM Kramnik did not play on round 5? |
|
May-07-17
 | | MissScarlett: You can't form a proper question? |
|
May-07-17 | | ambongtumbong: yeah I cannot.. |
|
May-07-17 | | botvinnik64: Hey Guys:
Just received my latest copy of New In Chess.
They have an article on "most accurate" moves played at top level. Not surprisingly, Kramnik's name keeps coming up. Anyone see? |
|
May-07-17 | | Howard: Yes, I noticed that. I also noticed that Spassky's performance at the 1988 Olympiad was listed as one of the "most accurate", too. Seems rather surprising given his age at the time. |
|
 |
 |
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 2 OF 3 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
|
|
|
NOTE: Create an account today
to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users.
Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username,
then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.
|
Please observe our posting guidelines:
- No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
- No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
- No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
- Nothing in violation of United States law.
- No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
- No trolling.
- The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
- Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.
Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic.
This forum is for this specific tournament only. To discuss chess or this site in general,
visit the Kibitzer's Café.
|
Messages posted by Chessgames members
do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration. |
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!
Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC
|