chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

🏆
TOURNAMENT STANDINGS
10th International Computer Tournament

Rybka (Computer)8/9(+8 -1 =0)[games]
Deep Sjeng (Computer)7/9(+5 -0 =4)[games]
HIARCS (Computer)6/9(+4 -1 =4)[games]
Shredder (Computer)6/9(+4 -1 =4)[games]
Deep Junior (Computer)5.5/9(+3 -1 =5)[games]
Komodo (Computer)5/9(+4 -3 =2)[games]
Pandix (Computer)5/9(+5 -4 =0)[games]
The Baron (Computer)4.5/9(+4 -4 =1)[games]
Spark (Computer)4/9(+3 -4 =2)[games]
The King (Computer)4/9(+3 -4 =2)[games]
Kallisto (Computer)3.5/9(+3 -5 =1)[games]
Almond (Computer)3.5/9(+3 -5 =1)[games]
Redqueen (Computer)0.5/9(+0 -8 =1)[games]
Joker (Computer)0.5/9(+0 -8 =1)[games]

 page 1 of 1; games 1-25 of 25  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. The Baron vs Rybka 0-141201010th International Computer TournamentC03 French, Tarrasch
2. Pandix vs Deep Junior 0-163201010th International Computer TournamentA30 English, Symmetrical
3. Redqueen vs Deep Sjeng 0-125201010th International Computer TournamentA77 Benoni, Classical, 9...Re8, 10.Nd2
4. Almond vs Komodo 0-137201010th International Computer TournamentB23 Sicilian, Closed
5. Almond vs Shredder  0-160201010th International Computer TournamentE43 Nimzo-Indian, Fischer Variation
6. Joker vs The Baron 0-155201010th International Computer TournamentC15 French, Winawer
7. The Baron vs Deep Junior  0-152201010th International Computer TournamentB45 Sicilian, Taimanov
8. Spark vs Rybka 0-165201010th International Computer TournamentB28 Sicilian, O'Kelly Variation
9. Redqueen vs Almond 0-133201010th International Computer TournamentB12 Caro-Kann Defense
10. Shredder vs Rybka 0-168201010th International Computer TournamentA87 Dutch, Leningrad, Main Variation
11. Komodo vs Shredder 0-1115201010th International Computer TournamentD38 Queen's Gambit Declined, Ragozin Variation
12. The King vs Spark 0-179201010th International Computer TournamentB31 Sicilian, Rossolimo Variation
13. Joker vs Kallisto  0-151201010th International Computer TournamentC45 Scotch Game
14. Almond vs Pandix  0-163201010th International Computer TournamentC95 Ruy Lopez, Closed, Breyer
15. Rybka vs Deep Sjeng 0-161201010th International Computer TournamentC45 Scotch Game
16. The King vs Komodo  0-166201010th International Computer TournamentB27 Sicilian
17. Redqueen vs Kallisto  0-198201010th International Computer TournamentC99 Ruy Lopez, Closed, Chigorin, 12...cd
18. Spark vs Almond 0-11201010th International Computer TournamentA00 Uncommon Opening
19. Deep Junior vs Rybka 0-158201010th International Computer TournamentC16 French, Winawer
20. Kallisto vs Shredder  0-130201010th International Computer TournamentC67 Ruy Lopez
21. Joker vs Deep Sjeng 0-155201010th International Computer TournamentC45 Scotch Game
22. Almond vs The Baron 0-119201010th International Computer TournamentC46 Three Knights
23. Kallisto vs The King  0-134201010th International Computer TournamentC89 Ruy Lopez, Marshall
24. Redqueen vs Spark  0-149201010th International Computer TournamentB32 Sicilian
25. The King vs Rybka 0-164201010th International Computer TournamentE10 Queen's Pawn Game
 page 1 of 1; games 1-25 of 25  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 6 OF 7 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jun-29-10  Zkid: <turbo231: <bharatiy>

>>zanshin<< on this page ran a tournament on his 4 core computer, 1 hour time limit.

Results
Houdini..... 4.5
Rybka 4..... 2.5
Fire 1.3..... 1.5>

That's impossible - each chess game adds 1 point to the score (two .5's or one 1.0) so you need an integer sum. You can't get the score of 8.5 given here no matter how hard you try. Either one of those numbers is a typo or (more likely - I don't see how you'd get .5 instead of .0) this tournament is fake.

Jun-30-10  turbo231: Looks as though Rybka4 is winning. What hurts Houdini is no end game table bases. WHY did they turn ponder off? When I conduct matches I never turn ponder off. In fact I never turn ponder off. Why would you want to?

This match could be controlled by the people at Rybka. Is this a legitimate match? Money can buy and Rybka has the money.

They could've turn ponder off because they didn't want the engines using the processor at the same time. That would make sense if they're using the same computer. I think I'll start turning ponder off because some engines hog all of the cpu. And some engines don't have the ability to stop them from hogging all of the cpu. So it's ponder off from now on.

Jun-30-10  The Rocket: I dont get how free-engines like stockfish and houdini have gotten so strong that they can beat rybka?

they used to be quite weak the last couple of years(the free engines).. is there something revolutionary that has happened to the chess engine world?

Jun-30-10  SugarDom: It's just the algorithms...

Rybka programming apparently is not that elegant...

Jun-30-10  turbo231: <Zkid>

It could have been a simple mistake. No one except zanshin knows. I was talking about ponder in the previous kibitz and that from now on I will turn ponder off.

That depends on the match or game, standard time limits ponder off, bullet or lighting game ponder on. A long blitz game ponder off, a short blitz game ponder on.

Jun-30-10  SugarDom: Turning ponder off will be a blunder...

Pondering gives a more accurate picture of the chess engine's strength.

Jun-30-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  tarek1: It's amazing. I first heard about these new engines in this very forum, and installed them using the Shredder interface : Stockfish, Fire, and Houdini. I had Rybka 3 and 4 before.

On my computer, Fire is the strongest engine in blitz (3') matches. I wondered if it was specific to blitz, ands I set up a match between Fire and Rybka 4 with 20' minutes games, with 20 games, to find out.

Fire crushed Rybka +9=10-1.

Jun-30-10  The Rocket: <"It's just the algorithms...>

<Rybka programming apparently is not that elegant...">

doesnt make sence to me.. if free engines are able to be stronger or equal to rybka. But the established programs like fritz, shredder and junior with a hole team working on them are still way behind...

Jun-30-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eric Schiller: Depends on what you mean by "eloquent
" TobyTal's claim to fame is that it is superstrong with a very small amount of code.
Jul-01-10  zanshin: <What is multiple PV? I am really liking houdini. Really a magician!>

Multiple PV is when the engine analyzes more than one line (principal variation) at a time.

Jul-01-10  zanshin: <Zkid: <turbo231: <bharatiy> >>zanshin<< on this page ran a tournament on his 4 core computer, 1 hour time limit.

Results
Houdini..... 4.5
Rybka 4..... 2.5
Fire 1.3..... 1.5>

That's impossible - >

These are partial results. The completed tournament was posted in my forum.

1. Houdini_w32_4CPU: 12.5
2. Rybka 4_w32: 10.0
3. Fire_131_w32_KLO: 7.5

Round robin three-engine tournament, 10 rounds - totals 30 points. Right?

Jul-01-10  zanshin: <turbo231: Robin Smith wrote a book about chess engines idiosyncrasies and chessbase did review of his book in 2004.>

<turbo> I also reviewed this book in the chessbookforum. Unfortunately, I might have overdone it as I wrote a 5 part review starting here: ChessBookForum chessforum

Also, you can check my forum header for all the types of positions engines in general don't solve. Most of them are from Smith's book, some are taken from other sources and specific to Rybka.

Jul-01-10  SugarDom: <SugarDom: Turning ponder off will be a blunder...

Pondering gives a more accurate picture of the chess engine's strength.>

And don't let the hash table size fall below 256 mb.

Jul-01-10  turbo231: <zanshin: I also reviewed this book>

Thank you for that info. You've done a lot of research on this subject. Very interesting. I'm going to have fun with this. Thanks again.

Jul-01-10  zanshin: <turbo> I find it a fascinating subject. If there's anything I might be able to help you with, feel free to ask.
Jul-02-10  SugarDom: For single CPU, there's a claim that Robbolito is the strongest.

I believe this.

Jul-02-10  Nina Myers: Some have a disposition to believe things without waiting for concrete proof. That's what I call dull!
Jul-02-10  r00ki: Which is stronger on a dual core machine? Firebird or Houdini
Jul-02-10  zanshin: <r00ki: Which is stronger on a dual core machine? Firebird or Houdini>

For single line analysis, I would guess Houdini, but it might depend on the time controls.

Jul-08-10  truefriends: I am sorry to spoil the party, but

http://wbec-ridderkerk.nl/html/last...

he is the force behind all these engines

http://www.chesslogik.com/

Jul-10-10  turbo231: I'm still watching these chess engine matches. Rybka4 vs Houdini 1.02 and StockFish 1.8 48 games each live.

Thanks to <nimh> kibitz.

First match won by Rybka4 vs Houdini 1.02

26.5/21.5

Second match Rybka4 vs StockFish 1.8

one game played 0.5/0.5

second game now being played live @3:10pm EDT

level 120/40/60/20/30+15

i7 cpu ponder off

Jul-16-10  Sydro: Houdini 1.03 has been released. New features:

Multi-PV, searchmove and large page support. Improved evaluation function.

http://www.cruxis.com/chess/houdini...

Jul-16-10  zanshin: <Sydro: Houdini 1.03 has been released.>

Thanks for the tip. I will try it out.

Jul-17-10  turbo231: me too. Great news for me I now have a 2 core laptop. They had to upgrade the motherboard. It's only a T2450 processor(old laptop that was the max it would take) but I love love love it. I'm multitasking now!

Time to check the Rybka vs Stockfish match. Rybka defeated Houdini in the first match 26.5-21.5. That was the Houdini 1.02 engine.

Jul-17-10  turbo231: After 31 of 48 games Rybka4 is beating Stockfish 1.8: 17.5-13.5.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 7)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 6 OF 7 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific tournament only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC