| World Rapid Championship (2012) |
|
The first official FIDE World Rapid Championship was a 16-player round robin held in Astana, Kazakhstan, 6-8 July 2012. The field consisted of 10 players from the FIDE rating list of January 2012, 3 players qualified from a 9-round Swiss open (for players rated >2300) tournament in Astana on 2-3 July (Kurnosov, Dreev and Tkachiev), 2 players selected by the organizer (Kazhgaleyev and Ismagambetov), and 1 player picked by FIDE (Bologan). Time control: 15 minutes per player for all moves, with 10 seconds added per move from move 1. Prize fund: $200,000, with $40,000 to the winner. Chief arbiter: Andrzej Filipowicz. Sergey Karjakin won with 11.5/15, ahead of Carlsen (2nd) and Topalov (3rd on tiebreak). 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 Karjakin * 0 ½ 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 ½ ½ 1 1 1 1 11½
2 Carlsen 1 * ½ 1 0 ½ ½ 0 ½ ½ 1 1 1 1 1 1 10½
3 Topalov ½ ½ * 1 1 ½ 1 ½ 1 ½ 1 1 0 ½ 0 ½ 9½
4 Mamedyarov 1 0 0 * 0 1 0 1 ½ ½ 1 1 1 1 ½ 1 9½
5 Grischuk 0 1 0 1 * ½ 0 ½ 0 1 ½ ½ 1 1 1 1 9
6 Gelfand 0 ½ ½ 0 ½ * ½ 1 ½ 1 1 0 ½ 1 1 0 8
7 Svidler 0 ½ 0 1 1 ½ * 0 ½ 1 0 ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 7½
8 Ivanchuk 0 1 ½ 0 ½ 0 1 * 1 0 ½ ½ 0 1 ½ 1 7½
9 Radjabov 0 ½ 0 ½ 1 ½ ½ 0 * ½ ½ 1 1 0 ½ 1 7½
10 Dreev 0 ½ ½ ½ 0 0 0 1 ½ * 1 ½ 0 ½ 1 1 7
11 Morozevich ½ 0 0 0 ½ 0 1 ½ ½ 0 * 1 ½ 1 ½ ½ 6½
12 Kurnosov ½ 0 0 0 ½ 1 ½ ½ 0 ½ 0 * 1 0 ½ 1 6
13 Kazhgaleyev 0 0 1 0 0 ½ ½ 1 0 1 ½ 0 * 0 ½ 1 6
14 Bologan 0 0 ½ 0 0 0 ½ 0 1 ½ 0 1 1 * 1 ½ 6
15 Tkachiev 0 0 1 ½ 0 0 ½ ½ ½ 0 ½ ½ ½ 0 * 0 4½
16 Ismagambetov 0 0 ½ 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 ½ 0 0 ½ 1 * 3½
Official site: https://web.archive.org/web/2014051...
Regulations: https://www.fide.com/FIDE/handbook/...
Chess.com: https://www.chess.com/news/view/ser...
ChessBase: https://en.chessbase.com/post/karja...
Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-4v...
TWIC: https://theweekinchess.com/chessnew...
FIDE: https://ratings.fide.com/tournament...
Wikipedia article: World Rapid Chess ChampionshipPrevious: Cap D'Agde FRA (2003) was recognized by FIDE as a World Rapid Championship. Next: World Rapid Championship (2013). See also World Blitz Championship (2012)
|
|
| page 1 of 5; games 1-25 of 120 |
     |
 |
|
| page 1 of 5; games 1-25 of 120 |
|
|
|
|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 7 OF 8 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
| Jul-08-12 | | Eyal: Congrats to Karjakin, with a fantastic finish of 4.5/5 today (including wins over Ivanchuk, Radjabov & Svidler). He's first with 11.5, Carlsen second with 10.5 (only 2/5 today - two losses and a single win against the weakest player in the tournament), and Topalov should be joining them on the podium as third with 9.5 (the same as Mamedyarov, but Topalov won their game and head-to-head result is the first tiebreak). |
|
| Jul-08-12 | | Eyal: Btw, in terms of prize money this means 40,000$ for Karjakin. His Norwegian 1990-contemporary will have to settle for 33,000. |
|
| Jul-08-12 | | gigeorg: What a great and inspiring performance by Topalov as well.To come back and play like this after all the beatings he took in the past two years is simply amazing and is what he ultimately needed to do,forget who he was what he had and had not done and simply play chess. |
|
| Jul-08-12 | | Shams: <Eyal> Wow, pretty good prize fund for a rapid event. |
|
| Jul-08-12 | | achieve: Chessinfinite
Excellent points. |
|
| Jul-08-12 | | AuN1: karjakin is a bad ass. i like how everyone wrote him off, as well as the rest of the field after carlsen took a big lead yesterday. where are all of the carlsen funboys now? |
|
| Jul-08-12 | | parmetd: I didn't write him off. I won big bucks :) |
|
| Jul-08-12 | | notyetagm: <voratco: <Looks like Carlsen has the World Rapid title in the bag now.> Looks like the bag has a hole in it. LOL.>
Yep, I was wrong. I said it was "money in the bank".
Sometimes I forget that Carlsen is not a chess god and *is* capable of losing. |
|
| Jul-08-12 | | notyetagm: <AuN1: ... where are all of the carlsen funboys now?> We're here, sulking, lamenting our lost chessbucks. |
|
| Jul-08-12 | | voyager39: Hail the new Rapid champ Karjakin! A fabulous and convincing victory. |
|
| Jul-08-12 | | voyager39: And I am happy for Topalov - he could have been #2 but for the terrible snafu where he blundered away a simple mating net against Carlsen. Yet, Topa seems to be back on his feet again and that's good for the game. |
|
| Jul-08-12 | | voyager39: <Chessinfinite> <One thing Carlsen must have learnt, having a good rating only means so much in chess, not everything. All this should be a good learning experience for him for the more important Candidates coming up. (All 3 players who stopped his final run are his opponents in the Candidates next yr)> Touché |
|
| Jul-08-12 | | Bobwhoosta: <AuN1>
Well, we're not in the same place you were when Carlsen was winning. That is, somewhere else. Carlsen fanboy, presenting for duty, sir! **Salutes** |
|
| Jul-08-12 | | Bobwhoosta: You know, one thing I find seriously enlightening is Carlsen detractors now think it's time to gloat when he gets second place. Seems to say a lot... |
|
| Jul-08-12 | | Kinghunt: Here is the live rating list for rapid chess after this event: Carlsen 2845
Karjakin 2843
Aronian 2819
Kramnik 2802
Anand 2794
Topalov 2779
Grischuk 2772
Mamedyarov 2768
Radjabov 2747
Ivanchuk 2737
Gelfand 2729
Svidler 2728
Morozevich 2713
Note that some rapid events that took place earlier in the year are not included. |
|
| Jul-08-12 | | whiteshark: < Heaven knows, we all make mistakes. That's life, and chess. <>> (Woody Allen) |
|
| Jul-08-12 | | Jim Bartle: "You know, one thing I find seriously enlightening is Carlsen detractors now think it's time to gloat when he gets second place." Well, it certainly is shameful to lose to such weakies as Ivanchuk and Grischuk. |
|
| Jul-08-12 | | badest: <voyager39: And I am happy for Topalov - he could have been #2 but for the terrible snafu where he blundered away a simple mating net against Carlsen. Yet, Topa seems to be back on his feet again and that's good for the game.> Indeed. He also did quite well against the stronger players (losses only towards Tkachiev and Kazhgaleyev, esp. the Tkachiev loss was a classic Topa achievement ;) Chessgames: shouldn't Topa be 3rd in the table. He won the game against Shak (which is the first tie-break criterion). |
|
| Jul-08-12 | | Arcturar: Congrats to Karjakin for a well-deserved victory!
Congrats to Topalov for looking like himself again. Perhaps he has come back to stay with the big guns for more than just this tournament. Congrats to Carlsen for a solid performance and a strong attempt. Finally, congrats to Boris Gelfand. 6th place out of 16 players in such a field is really quite a good performance. I doubt many will mention or even notice it though, which is too bad. |
|
| Jul-08-12 | | Everett: I love rapids, chess at the pace of life! Who wants to sit on their tuchus for 5 hours when one can play quite good chess in an hour? Hour to play, hour to analyze, and twenty-two hours to live! Even better here, five games a day, packed with information regarding one's intuition under time pressure. I think rapid (25m + inc.) is a great time control. |
|
| Jul-08-12 | | Everett: BTW, I wonder if they can have a prize for the least draws while having a winning record. This could also reward those who strive to win each game. Both Karjakin and Mamedyarov fit the bill. |
|
| Jul-08-12 | | Everett: Sorry I missed all the other kibitzing; where are Aronian, Kramnik, Anand and Nakamura? |
|
| Jul-08-12 | | messachess: This is great for Karjakin. It's interesting what Korchnoi said a few years ago in an interview when he was talking about the young players. He liked Carlsen and Morozevich, but not Karjakin. I wonder what he thinks now. |
|
| Jul-08-12 | | drik: <Chessinfinite: One thing Carlsen must have learnt, having a good rating only means so much in chess, not everything.> I'm sure he learnt this whilst carving his way through higher rated players as a teenager. He outperformed his rating - Karajakin just did so by a greater margin. <All this should be a good learning experience for him for the more important.> He might learn how to bounce back immediately after a loss - but I think rapids are different. You have minutes instead of hours to compose yourself ... & who plays the Berlin in Rapids? The Berlin needs greater precision from black than white, which is fine when you have time. The fact is that rapid & blitz need a different opening repetoire to standard & it doesn't look as if Carlsen has prepared one. I used to play the Sicilian regardless of time control, when a blitz specialist took me aside and explained that I was burning time defending & liquidating into won endings, which I lost on time. In the fast stuff the initiative trumps strategy. |
|
| Jul-09-12 | | Augalv: <OBIT: This is rapid chess. You can't assume Karjakin will be able to get a short draw, even with the White pieces. Well, except in this case he is playing a countryman, so the likelihood of a draw is looking pretty good.> You are funny. |
|
|
|
|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 7 OF 8 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
|
|
|
NOTE: Create an account today
to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users.
Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username,
then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.
|
Please observe our posting guidelines:
- No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
- No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
- No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
- Nothing in violation of United States law.
- No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
- No trolling.
- The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
- Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.
Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic.
This forum is for this specific tournament only. To discuss chess or this site in general,
visit the Kibitzer's Café.
|
Messages posted by Chessgames members
do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration. |
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!
Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC
|
Kibitzing
