chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Louis Paulsen vs Simon Winawer
Vienna (1882), Vienna AUH, rd 25, Jun-10
Scotch Game: Horwitz Attack (C45)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Annotations by Stockfish (Computer).      [35436 more games annotated by Stockfish]

explore this opening
find similar games 7 more Paulsen/Winawer games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Games that have been used in game collections will have a section at the bottom which shows collections which include it. For more information, see "What are Game Collections?" on our Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

THIS IS A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE.   [CLICK HERE] FOR ORIGINAL.

Kibitzer's Corner
Dec-01-03  patzer2: This game reflects the BCO recommended reply to the rare 4...Qh4 in the Scotch with 5. Nb5! Bb4+ 6. c3! White appears to have a confortable initiative after 6. c3, and easily exploits his advantage.
Dec-01-03  refutor: an interesting game in this line (4. ... Qh4 not the line given by patzer2) is S Rosenthal vs Steinitz, 1870 MCO gives 5.Nc3 Bb4 6.Be2! Qxe4 7.Ndb5 Bxc3+ 8.bxc3 Kd8 with the recommendation for 5.Nb5 being 5. ... Qxe4 6.Be3 Kd8 7.N1c3 Qe5 8.Nd5 giving at as unclear.
Dec-02-03  patzer2: <refutor> Thanks for the game and the recommendations from MCO on the Steinitz variation of the Scotch (4...Qh4).

In the 5. Nb5 Qxe4+ response, BCO gives 5...Qxe4+ 6. Be2 [if 6. Be3, then BCO gives 6...Qe5! 7. Nd2 d5 8. Nf3 Qe7 9. Qxd5 Be6 (O'Hanlon-Mikenas, Buenos Aires Ol 1939) 10. Qd2 Rd8 11. Bd3 Nb4 with a slight black advantage] 6...Kd8 [if 6...Bb4+, then 7. Be2 leads to a white advantage] 7. 0-0 a6 8. N1c3 Qe8 9. Nd4 as equality with compensation leaning towards a clear white advantage. One nice win I particularly enjoyed in this BCO recommended variation with 5...Qxe4+ 6. Be2 was Hebert vs Biyiasis, 1978

In the MCO main line you cite, BCO relegates their recommended 5. Nc3 to a footnote in favor of 5. Nb5! (exclamation point being Kasparov and Keene's in BCO). Their line here is 5. Nc3 Bb4 6. Ndb5 Qxe4+ 7. Be2 Bxc3+ 8. Nxc3 Qd4 (consider 8...Qe7!? intending 9. Nb5 Qd8) 9. Bd3 Nb4 10. 0-0! Nxd3 11. Nb5 Qc4 12. Qxd3 Qxd3 13. cd Kd8 14. Bf4 d6 15. Rac1 Bd7 16. Nxc7 Rc8 with equality.

However, as a very good option I do like the possibilities in the MCO recommendation 5. Nc3 Bb4 6. Be2! (exclamation point being MCO's I assume) with white winning 11 of 17 games in the Chessgames.com database (63.6%) and drawing two games (18.2%). Some wins showing white's potential in this sequence are Karjakin vs V Malinin, 2002 and S Kalevic vs A Dimovska, 2001 and S Prudnikova vs J Bokan, 2001 and D Petrukhin vs V Rudkovsky, 2001 and Z Vukovic vs Mozetic, 1991 and Oral vs M Kantorik, 2000

However, following this MCO recommendation resulted in a win for black in Z Medvegy vs A Karpatchev, 2001 and G Kjartansson vs O Simonsen, 2001 making me somewhat reluctant to enter this MCO recommended variation. Also holding a U.S. GM to the better of a draw in Ashley vs D Bokan, 1998 as well as the draw secured in R Espinoza vs L Day, 1994 seems to indicate black has more than adequate defensive resources in this line.

I suppose if I had to enter the Stenitz as White I am currently leaning toward the reply 5. Nb5 (Kasparov and Keene's main recommendation in BCO) or 5. Qd3 (recommended as leading to a slight white advantage by Kasparov and Keene in BCO) as in Maczuski vs Kolisch, 1864 (where you will find more discussion of the 4...Qh4 line along with a post giving information on two books on the line by GM Gutman and IM Hall respectively).

However, note that I enjoy games with tactics and complicated positions, so more positional players who like more clarity and certainty might prefer the MCO recommendation 5. Nc3 Bb4 6. Be2! However, tactically inclined players might find more fireworks and double edged play with 5. Nb5.

Jul-09-07  lentil: 30. ... Qg6 31. Ne5 Qh6 32. Rxd6!
Nov-18-07  nimh: Rybka 2.4 mp, AMD X2 2.01GHz, 10 min per move, threshold 0.33.

Paulsen 2 mistakes:
18.0-0 0.38 (18.0-0-0 0.76)
27.Nf3 1.29 (27.h4 1.75)

Winawer 9 mistakes:
15...f5 0.47 (15...Re8 -0.04)
22...Ne5 0.58 (22...Nf5 0.24)
24...Nc4 1.09 (24...N5c6 0.65)
25...d5 1.80 (25...Na5 1.03)
28...Qf5 2.68 (28...Qc8 1.30)
29...Rh5 3.72 (29...Rg6 2.72)
32...Ra5 4.97 (32...Rc5 3.85)
48...Nb4 19.27 (48...Nd5 10.60)
52...Nd2 39.23 (52...Ne3 17.95)

Oct-09-19  SymphonicKnight: Stockfish considers 7.Qf3! more than +.50 superior to 7.Qe2?! Blocking the Bf1 is not consistent. 8.Qd8! is considered to be =0.00.

Stockfish likes 12.0-0 and 13.f4 at +0.80, and doesn't like trading off the B at 14...Bxf3? and prefers the recapture by 15.Qxf3!

As Nimh shows, Winawer should have resigned by move 29. Paulsen was far too good to lose the position.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC