chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Siegbert Tarrasch vs Mikhail Chigorin
Hastings (1895), Hastings ENG, rd 5, Aug-10
Queen Pawn Game: Stonewall Attack (D00)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 17 times; par: 58 [what's this?]

Annotations by Stockfish (Computer).      [35437 more games annotated by Stockfish]

explore this opening
find similar games 34 more Tarrasch/Chigorin games
sac: 28...cxd3 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

THIS IS A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE.   [CLICK HERE] FOR ORIGINAL.

Kibitzer's Corner
Dec-03-03
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: Magnificent game of Chigorin!
Sep-26-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: Chigorin's play at Hastings was some of the best of his career. Examining the position after the exchange sacrifice, Tarrasch could have played 31 Qb4 Bc6 32 Rc5 Qd6 and White's temporary initiative is gone and he will be pushed on the defensive trying to hold back the 3 center pawns. This looks better than the flashy 31 Qb4 e4?! 32 Rc5 d2 33 Rxd2 Rxf5 34 Qxb5 Qxc5 35 Qxc5 Rxc5 36 Rxd4 and Black will emerge with a passed a pawn, but at the cost of the connected advanced trio.
Sep-26-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Evening: Sometimes it seems that all of the players at a tournament will have an unspoken agreement to play aggressive, imaginative games which will remain difficult to analyze decades or even a century later. Zurich 1953 is one, Hasting 1895 another. The funny thing about Tarrasch's loss here, and his loss against Pillsbury, is that you have to be a really, really good player to lose games like those. 3...Nc6 is a lovely little shot, with the threats of both 4...e5 and 4...Nb4. White probably should have swallowed his pride and played 5.Be2,c5; 6.c3,Nc6; 7.Nf3 with a reversed Stonewall Dutch Defense, instead of a Stonewall Attack without the vital light-squared Bishop.
Sep-27-05  capanegra: 28…cxd3!! is a splendid move. I love how Black, after sacrificing the exchange, patiently plays 30…h6 in order to put his King into safety before launching the attack.

Chigorin played very inspired and made an outstanding score at Hastings 1895, winning over Pillsbury (who ended first), Lasker (third), Tarrasch (fourth), Von Bardeleben, Teichmann, Schlechter, Blackburne, Mason, Burn, Gunsberg, Marco, Pollock, Tinsley and Vergani. I think it is not exaggerated to say that it was his best tournament performance given the power of his opponents.

Pillsbury noted that 33.Rf8 also loses, but didn't say how. Bogoljubov gave the following continuation: 33.Rf8 d2!! 34.Rxd2 Qe4 35.Rf2 Rxf8 36.Qxf8 Bb5!

Sep-27-05  aw1988: Junior points out the strange 30...Ba6, with large advantage. Computers...

Sep-27-05  fgh: <aw1988>: Obviously, 30. ... Ba6 is the quickest way to win since it avoids a check on c8.
Sep-27-05  aw1988: I doubt any human would make such a mundane move.
Sep-27-05  fgh: Perphaps Nakamura the cheater :-) Don't forget what <LIFE Master AJ> said :-)
Sep-27-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  IMlday: <Englishman>: "Sometimes it seems that all of the players at a tournament will have an unspoken agreement to play aggressive, imaginative games which will remain difficult to analyze decades or even a century later." Quite true, and quite what Ray Keene was thinking while picking participants in the Staunton Memorial. The combative 'agreement' is unspoken; it just grows out of the personalities of the players.
Sep-27-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: Then you get tournaments like the 1st Tigran Petrosian Memorial... http://www.ruschess.com/Archive/199...
Nov-06-05  lentil: <offramp> sheesh. they must have put saltpetre in their (decaf) coffee!
Jun-01-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <offramp> that's hilarious. Three decisive games in the whole tournament?! ? Well, I'm sure it's been said, but it was a fitting memorial.
Jun-01-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Gypsy: <keypusher...I'm sure it's been said, but it was a fitting memorial.> Lol.
Jul-23-09  Knight13: 16. fxe5 would've been better for kingside attack purposes.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC