Lubbertus Hofstee Deelman vs Adrianus Bleijkmans (1887)

Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players ·

Kibitzing

Lubbertus Hofstee Deelman vs Adrianus Bleijkmans
NED corr (1887) (correspondence), Netherlands
Dutch Defense: General (A80) · 0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Annotations by Stockfish (Computer). [35434 more games annotated by Stockfish]

explore this opening	find similar games	4 more games of L H Deelman
sac: 38...Qe1+	PGN: download \| view \| print	Help: general \| java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

THIS IS A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE. [CLICK HERE] FOR ORIGINAL.

< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 1 OF 2 · Later Kibitzing>
Mar-05-18		areknames: 37..Qe4+ to force the King into the corner followed by an almost compulsory Q sac followed by your trustworthy back rank mate.

Mar-05-18		ChessHigherCat: Check'm & Wreck'm

Mar-05-18		tjshann: Monday, and this time a delayed Queen sac. First Qe4+, then the Q sac leading to mate by Rook

Mar-05-18		SuperPatzer77: 1...Qe4+!, 2. Ka1 Qe1+, 3. Nxe1 Rxe1#

Mar-05-18		saturn2: Qe4 followed by back rank mate

Mar-05-18		Cheapo by the Dozen: The queen -- Lady Macbeth -- nudges the king into disaster.

Mar-05-18		lost in space: I love Mondays! 37...Qe4+ 38. Ka1 (only move) Qe1+ 39. Nxe1 (only move) Rxe1# Most complicated was to find out that it is black to move.

Mar-05-18		Gregor Samsa Mendel: 37 Rxh7 was a horrible blunder, especially for a correspondence game.

Mar-05-18		saturn2: White's kingside attack looked impressive but black defended well.

Mar-05-18		gawain: This is terrific. The immediate...Qe1+ does not work but if Black begins with 37...Qe4+ White is helpless.

Mar-05-18		stst: An Installment Loan, need 2 stages to finish: 37........Qe4+ 38.Ka1 (only sq.) Qe1+ again 39.NxQ but then RxN# as the K smothers himself, too deep to get out.

Mar-05-18		agb2002: Black has a bishop for a knight and a pawn. White threatens Rxe7. Black wins with 37... Qe4+ 38.Ka1 Qe1+ 39.Nxe1 Rxe1#. The direct sacrifice 37.. Qe1+ would work if Black's c-pawn were on c4.

Mar-05-18		AlicesKnight: Not too hard once you see the ....e4 check first. Somebody please explain why not 34....Nxh4.

Mar-05-18		Boerboel Guy: <Gregor Samsa Mendel: 37 Rxh7 was a horrible blunder, especially for a correspondence game.> Exactly! and in fact 37 gxh7+! wins for White...

Mar-05-18		perfidious: Most likely, the score has a typo and White's 34th move was Qh3 instead.

Mar-05-18		gofer: This is a <correspondence game> and white played <37 Rxh7??> That is really bizarre! <37 gxh7+ ...> 37 ... Kf8 38 h8=Q+ Kf7 39 Qh7+ Kf8 40 Qxf4+ mating 37 ... Kg7 38 h8=Q+ Rxh8 (Kf7 Qxf4+ mating) 39 Qf7+ Kxh6 40 Qf6+ +- 37 ... Kf7 38 Qxf4+ Kg7 39 h8=Q+ Rxh8 39 Rxh8 Kxh8 40 Qe5+ +- <37 ... Kh8> <38 Qxf4 ...> White is winning this at a canter. How does someone miss the mating threat (after <37 Rxh7??>) during a correspondence game?!

Mar-05-18		goodevans: <34...Nf8??>, <35.Bxh7+??>, <36...Qe7??>, <37.Rxh7??>. Practically all of the last few moves before the finale were outright blunders. I can only imagine that both players were in severe time trouble! ;o)

Mar-05-18		gofer: <perfidious:> You must be right! It's a really good explanation for the difficulties that white was facing at <37 ...?> and explains everything!

Mar-05-18		SpamIAm: <goodevans>, they must have FedExed all of their last five moves. ;)

Mar-05-18		morfishine: First <37...Qe4+> forces the White King into the corner, then <38...Qe1+> forces mate *****

Mar-05-18		malt: Starting with 37...Qe4+ 38.Ka1 Qe1+ 39.N:e1 R:e1# <Check'm & Wreck'm> 37.gh7+ would be better for White

Mar-05-18		zb2cr: Mate in three, forced. 37. ... Qe4+; 38. Ka1, Qe1+; 39. Nxe1, Rxe1#.

Mar-05-18		sorokahdeen: Ditto on the previous comments re: "Correspondence? Really?" Let me add: "That wasn't blitz? Are you sure?!"

Mar-05-18		mqhelisi: Zwischenzug pure breed!

Mar-05-18		zborris8: Vides videsit echo man vintsvides man tridusit. Vimus curmudgle videsvints Vides vintsmarquisyogis vides vimus flips videsit dudes hatusit, it swinus Vides vides flavs vimusvasts vides dudes. Tridus dudesit bulks flak fulco mack vintsvimus vides vimus Tridusvimushiats. Vimus bulks vintsvimus, winter c4?? Marquis try dushat is what ushat hints bang!! Vints tridus vints!! Sucksuk mac schlongschlong. Gobusit's vides, vintsvides videsmarquis' vintsbangs. Flags vimus flipsvasts Vides bulks hints vintsit'svasts vimus knight's videsits. Vides vile vimus fife curvy it hint shiat: Qe4+ sew dirty harrys hints vimusit's vides hatusits.

search thread:
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 1 OF 2 · Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
Nothing in violation of United States law.
No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
No trolling.
The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CORRESPONDENCE. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.