chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Efim Bogoljubov vs Emanuel Lasker
New York (1924), New York, NY USA, rd 8, Mar-26
Spanish Game: Berlin Defense (C65)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 5 times; par: 138 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 7 more Bogoljubov/Lasker games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Dec-09-03  aragorn69: New York 1924 (again...) !

Chessgames :
The score could be wrong. It seems that 67.f5 (and not f6) and 71.Kg5 (and not Kh6) were played, all other moves remaining equal...

Dec-09-03
Premium Chessgames Member
  Chessical: The score given by Chessgames matches that of Alekhine's tournament book.
Dec-09-03  aragorn69: OK, thx Chessical. Since A.'s book is a primary source, I guess we can leave it at that.
Dec-09-03
Premium Chessgames Member
  Calli: Hmmm Alekhine's annotations should be public domain by now. Hint, hint :-)
Dec-09-03
Premium Chessgames Member
  Chessical: <Calli> There are three pages of about 10 point size (descriptive) annotation by Alekhine in the Dover edition (ISBN 486-20752-8) pg.87-89.

Very briefly, Alekhine does not like Bogoljubov's 13th recommending 13.Qd2 then b3, Rae1 and Ne2.

Alekhine does not like Bogoljubov's offer to exchange Q's on move 24(better: 24.Qg3), nor Lasker's acceptance. He belives that Bogoljubov could still draw after the exchange, but states that if Lasker had played instead 24...Bxg2 followed by Qc6+, Bogoljubov would soon have to resign.

Alekhine thought 33.a3 put more difficulties in Lasker's way.

He finds the ending "a laboured realization of a slight material advantage". Alekhine wanted Lasker to "continue with an attack full of promise of success without stopping to gain material" on move 35, rather than win the pawn. Rather infuriatingly, Alekhine does not provide a variation other than to indicate a general advance of the K-side pawns was in order.

Alekhine obviously found it worthwhile to study closely Lasker's very subtle endgame play in this game, but he is rather mean in handing out praise.

Dec-09-03
Premium Chessgames Member
  Calli: <Chessical> Thank you for typing out the main points. My hint was to Chessgames to include the notes to NY 1924 in the database. Don't know if they are available electronically, however. It is my understanding that most everything 75 years and older is in the public domain.
Mar-13-05  aw1988: Since when did Lasker play a world championship against Bogoljubow?
Mar-13-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  paulalbert: He didn't. This game is from the 8th round of the great NY 1924 tournament won by Emanuel Lasker. The soresheet here is mislabeled for some reason. Paul Albert
Mar-13-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  paulalbert: Correction: "scoresheet"
Dec-13-14  Ulhumbrus: After 26...Nxe4 Lasker will end up winning and yet White appears to have the stronger minor piece. This suggests the question: How would Lasker have handled the white side of this ending? One answer is to try to develop White's king eg by 27 Kg1
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Round 8 March 26th
from New York 1924 by Benzol
Round 8 March 26th
from New York 1924 - Alekhine by StoppedClock
N+ R v. R+B
from keypusher's bookmarked games by keypusher
4-Ruy Lopez
by webbing1947
A good endgame by Lasker
from Greatest endgames ever by timothee3331
Round 8 March 26th
from New York 1924 by JoseTigranTalFischer
4-Ruy Lopez
by classicalwin2
Game 101
from Think Like a Grandmaster (Kotov) by isfsam
West Side story
from Grega's 3d coll by Grega
Round 8 March 26th
from New York 1924 - Alekhine by vantheanh
Game 101 'Think Like a Grandmaster' by Alexander Kotov
from Spanish B Defense Bin Fed Fredthebear by fredthebear
Game 101
from Think Like a Grandmaster (Kotov) by Qindarka
On the shoulders of giants
by ughaibu
RLC Round Up by Fredthebear
by fredthebear
Game 101
from Think Like a Grandmaster (Kotov) by mneuwirth


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC