chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Efim Geller vs Tigran Vartanovich Petrosian
9th Soviet Team-ch final A (1963), Moscow URS, rd 3, Aug-14
French Defense: Winawer. Advance Variation General (C16)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 8 times; par: 67 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 39 more Geller/Petrosian games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Dec-04-02  ughaibu: There were at least two beautiful wins by Petrosian in the 1966 match. But in Chess he got terrible reviews despite the fact that he was the first champion to beat the challenger since Alekhine pushed the wood with his crony Bogolubow, in short the first convincing title defense since Lasker.
Dec-04-02  drukenknight: ugi, do you know which game in '66 that was? I tried to find it in the database but failed.
Dec-04-02  Kulla Tierchen: I would not call 4 wins, 3 losses and 17 draws convincing.
Dec-04-02  PVS: drukenknight: I think you are referring to game ten, a King's Indian.
Dec-04-02  drukenknight: RE Title defenses. Didn't Botwinnik defend his title in the early 50s against Bronstein and/or Keres? I dont know if you consider them convinving or not. I guess you have to play through and determine for yourself. I know Sam Sloan had an article on one of Keres/Botwinnik games during ww II.
Dec-04-02  drukenknight: Hmmm take another look at this one guys. Back to blacks 18th.
Dec-04-02  ughaibu: If he does Ke8 Geller can still play Re6.
Dec-04-02  ughaibu: Drukenknight: These are the games I had in mind. Spassky vs Petrosian, 1966 Petrosian vs Spassky, 1966
Dec-05-02  PVS: Petrosyan went to pieces in this game. He was lost after ten moves.
Dec-05-02  PVS: TITLE DEFENCES

As world champion, excluding return matches when he was officially a challenger, the great Botvinnik had the following record:

1951 Bronstein drew

1954 Smyslov drew

1957 Smyslov lost

1960 Tal lost

1963 Petrosyan lost

And this is a man who had the full backing of the Soviet chess federation as well as influence higher up. He had opponents threatened and rarely played in any other events, he only prepared for his matches and could not win a single one. A pathetic record unmatched in the annals of chess history.

Dec-05-02  ughaibu: It seems Petrosian's plan with f6 was tactically flawed.
Dec-05-02  Kenneth Sterling: Yes, I think you could say that.
Dec-06-02  PVS: 9...Bb7 is a lot better. 10...fxe5 is not good either.
Dec-06-02  drukenknight: I'll go a little bit later and suggest: 13...Bd6
Dec-06-02
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sneaky: 13...Bd6? 14.Rxe6+!
Dec-06-02  ughaibu: I dont really approve of Nge7, I prefer Bb7 and castling long straight away.
Aug-31-05  aw1988: <in short the first convincing title defense since Lasker.> You're kidding, right? There were plenty before Petrosian and Spassky.
Aug-31-05  Happypuppet: <aw> Their point is that Petrosian beat a worthy challenger with a plus score, while everyone between Lasker and Petrosian either drew/lost (Botvinnik) or didn't really play someone worthy of challenging the World Champion (Alekhine v Bogoljubow or however you spell that dang name =p).
Aug-31-05  aw1988: That still is a vast understatement...
Aug-31-05  iron maiden: Alekhine-Bogoljubov aside, no world champion ever won a title match in the fifty-five years between 1911 and 1966.
Aug-31-05  aw1988: Botvinnik? Smyslov and Tal?
Aug-31-05  Resignation Trap: <aw1988> What <iron maiden> meant was that no <<incumbent>> world champion ever won a title match during that period.
Aug-31-05  aw1988: OH, 1966. I mixed up the Petrosian talk above and assumed it was Lasker-Petrosian, not 1911-1966. Seems trivial, but I get the idea. Sorry.
Sep-10-09  LimSJ: at a glance i asked myself why not 29...hxg5? or was Black hesitant about white's pawn majority.? i realized my patzer eyes missed considering several squares (g7,g8) off while replaying this game. ofcourse, not after 30.Rc8+ knocks the rook off the corner! today is not my day to unwind with replays after work :)
Mar-03-12  ewan14: No way was Petrosian taking this game ( 100% ) seriously

If we was wanting to avoid defeat he would not have played the Winawer

search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
The Giants of Power Play by Neil McDonald
by hms123
Grandmaster Geller: The First Quarter Century
by Resignation Trap
Zentrum 8-5
from Strategie 1 - 6 Tigersprung auf DWZ 1800 by 5nizza
Geller beats the world champions and pretenders
by ughaibu
Efim Geller's Best Games
by KingG
Assorted good games II
by rbaglini
1.Bird Bind - the problem with 10...fxe5
from 100 Chess Masters Trade Secrets -Soltis by takchess
Geller and Tal beat the French
by ughaibu
War of nerves
from The Application of Chess Theory by xajik
Soltis
by VervetMonkey
Game 88
from Application of Chess Theory (Geller) by Qindarka
War of nerves
from The Application of Chess Theory by Benzol
Petrosian variation
from Ideas In The French Defense by oao2102
Game 23
from Chess Secrets - Power Play (McDonald) by Qindarka
Old Geller
by crawfb5
Efim Geller's Best Games
by alip
War of nerves
from The Application of Chess Theory by nakul1964
Bird Bind
from 100 trade secrets by CoachK
The Giants of Power Play by Neil McDonald
by Patca63
1.Bird Bind - the problem with 10...fxe5
from 100 Chess Masters Trade Secrets -Soltis by rajeshupadhyay
plus 1 more collections (not shown)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC