chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Emanuel Lasker vs David Janowski
New York (1924), New York, NY USA, rd 12, Apr-02
Spanish Game: Morphy Defense. Steinitz Deferred (C79)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 36 more Lasker/Janowski games
sac: 58.Rxe3 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can step through the moves by clicking the < and > buttons, but it's much easier to simply use the left and right arrow keys on your keyboard.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jan-07-03  ughaibu: On the subject of favourite pieces, Janowski was famous for his preference for bishops. This is another game that Lasker manages to win from an all but hopeless position. Alekhine says that Janowski could have won had he been able to bring himself to exchange his bishops. I wonder if Lasker had engineered this dilema for him.
Jan-08-03  drukenknight: He had probably read the book that said the B pair was an advantage.
Jan-09-03
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: Janowski could play for example 38...Bxd3 39.Nxd3 Rxd3 40.Rxd3 Rxd3 41.Ke2 e4 42.Rxe4 Rxc3 winning a pawn with better position. Also 40...Bxd3 was possible. And 49...Rh7 instead of 49...Be3 could hold big advantage of black too. 60...Kc7 was a blunder losing a piece. After 60...Re2 61.Rxb7+ (61.Nxf5? Rgg2) 61...Kc6 62.Rxg7 Rxe3 63.Ne4 Rxf3 black is 1 pawn dawn, but he has good chances to keep draw.
Jun-18-05  iron maiden: Hey Calli, does this fit in your Lasker collection?
Jun-18-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  Calli: Thanks, will look at it closer as time permits.

"Lasker plays such stupid chess. I can't stand it!" - Dawid Janowsky

Nov-14-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Calli: <iron maiden> Yes it does! I forgot about and it took 18 months to get back to it. :-o
May-22-15  Howard: This could have been the sensation of the tournament, if Janowski had won it--which he almost certainly should have.
Jul-24-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: "You see, Edward? I told you two knights are better than a rook!"
Jan-12-20  Howard: According to the Stockfish analysis posted above, Janowski apparently had a won game!
Jan-13-20  WorstPlayerEver: 27... b5 and Black is winning.
Jan-13-20  WorstPlayerEver: 40... Bxd3 0-1


click for larger view

Jan-13-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: Euwe analysed this long ago in his monumental work on the middle game, the conclusion being that even Lasker's considerable defensive skills should not have been sufficient to stave off defeat.

I would attribute Janowski's loss to necromancy and legerdemain on the part of his redoubtable opponent.

Jan-13-20  WorstPlayerEver: -45... Be7 still was a win.

-49... gxf3 also.

-54. Rb3 and White had survived.

-56. Nf2=

-56. Nc3 Be3? 57. Nd5!

Point were Janowski blundered. 56... Rg2 or Bd4 were better.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
p.44 move order??
from Lipnitsky Modern Chess Theory by cgrob
Round 12 April 2nd
from New York 1924 - Alekhine by StoppedClock
Round 12 April 2nd
from New York 1924 by Benzol
Round 12 April 2nd
from New York 1924 - Alekhine by vantheanh
Round 12 April 2nd
from New York 1924 by JoseTigranTalFischer
Treasure's Ark
by Gottschalk
Spanish Game: Morphy Def. Steinitz Deferred (C79) 1-0 Stockfish
from Spanish, Steinitz Defenses by fredthebear
Janowski looks clearly winning
from Lasker's Great Escapes by Calli
Spanish Game: Morphy Def. Steinitz Deferred (C79) 1-0 Stockfish
from -ER Fischer by fredthebear
Selected Lasker
by LaBourdonnaisdeux
Game 26
from 150 Chess Endings by suenteus po 147

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC