chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Antero Harju vs M Liimatta
Corr. (1989/91) (correspondence), Corr. 1989/91
King's Gambit: Accepted. Fischer Defense (C34)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 1 more A Harju/M Liimatta game
sac: 16...Qxh2+ PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Some games have photographs. These are denoted in the game list with the icon.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jan-04-05  Skylark: Kg3 Ne3+ still works because of the g8-rook.

I got it; an easy win of a rook.

Jan-04-05  Novice713: <Skylark> oh yes, of course
Jan-04-05  erimiro1: Nice and easy, and a very sad end to the King's Gambit. I still hope, that one day someone will find the way to refresh that classical openning, like Bronstein and Spassky did during the 50's and the 60's.
Jan-04-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  Willem Wallekers: <a very sad end to the King's Gambit> Not if white plays 6. 0-0 in stead of 6.g3
Jan-04-05  Ed Caruthers: Why not 13...Qxh2+ winning the exchange a few moves earlier? Were there chances to win more if White went wrong between the 13th & 17th moves?
Jan-04-05  beenthere240: 16 Rxd2 isn't any better for white, since after 16...Qh4+ the R has to return to h2 and the sac is back in place.
Jan-04-05  cuendillar: <Ed Caruthers> It has been tried before where white eventually managed to win. Obviously black should have won that one too, but the line played was obviously better. Spassky vs Portisch, 1967
Jan-04-05  mahmoudkubba: I do'nt understand why the white resigned so early?? any news on that??
Jan-04-05  themindset: because he is down a rook.
Jan-04-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: At first,I looked for the mate-then I realized that after the queen sac at h2,white couldn't save his own queen-which was to be lost by fork or discovered check (on g file by disc. ch.,on h file by ♘f2+ forking both ♔ and ♕)
Jan-04-05  acirce: <Please don't delete it and steal my amusement. ;)> No, why should I do that?
Jan-04-05  hintza: <acirce> LOL. You are just too sharp!
Jan-04-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  benveniste: After 20 Ke1, the game goes something like:
20. Ke1 Nxd5
21. Kxd1 Nxe2
22. Nxe2 dxe5
22. fxe5 0-0-0+
...
White's isolated e-pawn eventually falls as well, leaving no play.
Jan-04-05  Stonewaller2: <erimiro1> I use the Falkbeer Counter Gambit, 2. ... d5. Lots of fun little tricks in there, besides which my experience has been it tends to shock the King's Gambiteer, as odd as that might seem.
Jan-04-05  beenthere240: 13...Qg3 appears to have been the killer, gaining time to drive the Queen off the d1-h5 diagonal with 14...Bg5. This move looks like a prepared novelty that refutes what had been (on white's part) an extremely speculative sacrifice of the exchange.
Jan-04-05  Nickisimo: <mahmoudkubba> White has no good response to 17...Ng4+.

If White moves his king anywhere on the g-file, 18. Kg2 or 18. Kg3, then 18...Ne3+(discovered check from the rook on g8), and Black wins the Queen and is up a rook.

If White tries 18. Kh1 or 18.Kh3, 18...Nf2+ forks the King and Queen.

So down a rook, White can safely resign here.

Jan-04-05  white pawn: I got this one :-D. The ♔ cannot escape check, and will lose his queen. Very nice
Jan-04-05  erikcu: Players who kibitz here must be pretty darn good. Five posts bantering the word "easy". Maybe seeing the initial fork was easy, but working out that you could stay up material in the end was not easy for me. It involves the threat/utilization of another possible fork. I suppose once you vizualize it, anything looks easy.

Thanks to the folks contributing the continuations. At my level it was not a cut and dry win.

Jan-04-05  chessowl: Ah I get it, the fork on the queen. Basic but still very nice. I like the Kings gambit too, though it is really easy to get into trouble (eg, 3...Bg4!)but I find that once most people accept the f pawn the lack of a center for Black gives white an advantage.

Question, can someone please define 'sac'?

Jan-04-05  white pawn: "Sac" = Sacrifice, as in, to give up a piece for a less valuable piece, in order to obtain an advantage.
Jan-04-05  erikcu: sac. an abreviation for sacrifice. To give up something valuable in the short term, hopefully for a long term gain.
Jan-04-05  Milo: Wha? Sorry if someone has already answered this, but isn't white just losing an exchange?

18.Kg3 Ne3+ 19.Kf2 Nxd1+ 20.Ke1 traps the knight, doesn't it?

Jan-04-05  Milo: The game is obviously lost in any case...
Jan-05-05  Stonewaller2: <Milo> Black's up the Exchange and a ♙ after ... ♘xb2. At my level I'd play it out as White tho. Taking the "winning" side in these kinds of positions make for good workouts for me against the computer.
Jan-05-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: Depending on White's 18th move reply, the game ends with either a knight fork or a discovered check, winning the White Queen. However, the combination setting up this resignable position begins with the "deflection" move 16...Qxh2+!
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CORRESPONDENCE. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
16...? (Tuesday, January 4)
from Puzzle of the Day 2005 by Phony Benoni
Brutal Attacking Chess
by Timothy Glenn Forney
Beating the King's Gambit
by ArmyBuddy
KG Accepted. Fischer Defense (C34) 0-1 Q sac, N fork
from g-pawn/file demolition after Fredthebear's ECO C by fredthebear
KG Accepted. Fischer Defense (C34) 0-1 Q sac, N fork
from xMack Daddy of More Recent Times by fredthebear
mqhelisi's favorite games
by mqhelisi
17 moves
from Chess Miniatures, Collection IV by wwall
roundabout was to get the queen back
from Favorite Queen Sacs (for m) by personal opawnion
16...? (January 4, 2005)
from Tuesday Puzzles, 2004-2010 by Phony Benoni
Brutal Attacking Chess
by rbaglini
17 moves
from Chess Miniatures, Collection IV by FRoeten
Awesome variety of forks for the queen...
from Collections in Idleness 3 by Trigonometrist
queen Sacrifices
by dfranks


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC