chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Tigran Vartanovich Petrosian vs Viktor Korchnoi
USSR Championship 1961a (1961), Moscow URS, rd 5, Jan-17
Gruenfeld Defense: Brinckmann Attack. Grünfeld Gambit (D83)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 34 times; par: 61 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 69 more Petrosian/Korchnoi games
sac: 34.Rxd5 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Help with kibitzing features can be found on our Kibtizing Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Mar-11-04  ughaibu: Korchnoi's one of these flexible types who plays all sorts of openings but in his case I dont think this is indicative of any kind of universality rather it suggests to me that there wasn't an opening that suited him, I guess that's why his play makes me feel like my clothes have been doused with itching powder and could explain why he was always losing on time.
Mar-11-04  drukenknight: I tend to agree. He had a hard time finding a response to 1 e4 when he played Karpov. He tried Russian, the Spanish usually got into some prepared opening. He did a Carokann or two, he did not trust the French at least vs Karpov finally settling on a Pirc when he lost the final game in Baguio in 1981. Obviously keeping things simple, like a Capablanca or a Lasker was not to his liking. How about a SPanish, Lucena var. for instance?

Spassky's joke about him has a ring to it. He seems to analyze everything so deeply that he often overlooked more obvious positional moves.

Mar-11-04  ughaibu: As I was writing that post I thought about Spassky's joke, maybe he had a point.
Mar-11-04  drukenknight: He did. You can find that sort of thing in at least one of the SPassky/Korchnoi games, I have made a comment about that game, you can probaly search it.

There's another game vs Timman in the Nimzo indian that is like that.

Mar-11-04  ughaibu: Thanks, I'll have a look. (The 1968 games?)
Mar-11-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: There was another joke about Korchnoi (if I remember right): He hated to put a piece on a good square because it meant then it had nowhere to go but bad squares.
Mar-11-04  drukenknight: Its funny to see him playing Fischer, have you looked at the Souza game? (one of only two in the database) That opening was a crazy English or Nimzo attack or something wasnt it? I dont know how he managed to save it at one pt he looked dead.
Feb-05-06  Resignation Trap: Korchnoi lost this game on time. His position is quite poor, anyway.
Feb-05-06  CapablancaFan: <Resignation Trap> <"Korchnoi lost this game on time"> ? What difference did it make? Look at the position, Korchnoi had nothing to fight for anyway.
Jan-10-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  watwinc: What? We're talking about a major FIGHTER at the chessboard. Nuts, maybe - but there's a rich tradition of that, and the Soviet players had plenty of justification for paranoia ...
Jan-10-11  Petrosianic: A lot of justification for paranoia, but Korchnoi liked to stir the pot and draw trouble onto himself. Kind of like standing on the street corner in the Third Reich, and yelling "The Gestapo Sucks!" On one hand you feel sorry for him, but on the other hand you want to say "Shut up, you idiot."

Not sure what that has to do with losing a game on time, though.

May-06-11  Rama: Well, his time spent on 28. ... e4, was time wasted. Why play e5 if not to exchange?
Oct-11-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: <Rama: <Well, his time spent on 28. ... e4, was time wasted. Why play e5 if not to exchange?>>


click for larger view

It's probably not that easy, e.g. <28...exd4 29.Rxd4 Rxd4 30.Rxd4> and if you for example trade-off the 2nd pair of rooks with <30... Rxd4 31.Qxd4 Bxc4 Qd8+> <kabum!!<>>


click for larger view

you get a lost endgame after some forced moves: <32... Kf7 33.Qd7+ Kg8 34.Qe8+ Kg7 35.Bd6 Bg8 36.Bf8+ Kh8 37.Bxh6 Qb7 38.Qd8 Qf7 39.Qxb6 >


click for larger view

Feb-05-12  Everett: White's 34th, another Petrosian exchange sac. Soltis in Rethinking the Chess Pieces mentions that Petrosian felt only one pawn was enough compensation for the exchange in most situations. Here he gets two pawns and takes away Korchnoi's two-bishop potential.

<drukenknight: I tend to agree. He had a hard time finding a response to 1 e4 when he played Karpov> huh? Check out Korchnoi's French vs Karpov. The problem for Korchnoi is that he was seeking winning chances at times, and he was only getting draws with Black, thus the switching of Black openings to positions more double-edged.

Aug-18-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  profK: I think Vitor fiddled , whilst Rome was about to be set on fire. And it was !!!
May-09-15  The17thPawn: I had heard that Korchnoi detested Petrosian but never why this was the case. Anyone know the reason for his animosity?
May-10-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: There's a good discussion of the feud at Tigran Vartanovich Petrosian.
Jun-16-15  The17thPawn: Thanks <offramp>
May-20-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  zydeco: This game made the difference between first and second place in this tournament. Korchnoi took an unjustifiable risk with 27....e5 and 28....e4. Petrosian played precisely.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Game 67
from Soviet Championships (Taimanov/Cafferty) by Qindarka
Exchange Sac by Petrosian
from 53a_Middlegames: Positional Exchange Sacrifices by Del ToRo
Cats of the Gruenfelds
by fredthebear
Book of Samurai's favorite games 5
by Book of Samurai
Gruenfeld Def: Brinckmann Attk. Grünfeld Gambit (D83) 1-0Exch S
from yRoundhouse Ruuks 4 by fredthebear
Round 5, Game #49
from USSR Championship 1961a by Phony Benoni
Exchange sacs - 1
by obrit
Power Chess - Petrosian
by Anatoly21
Run out of titles for the games
from Petrosian sacs the exchange by arsen387
Strategic battles
by TheDestruktor
Zonal Tournament Game #5
from Road to the Championship - Tigran Petrosian by suenteus po 147
Exchange Sac by Petrosian
from 53a_Middlegames: Positional Exchange Sacrifices by whiteshark
Trainning to a brilliant practice
by Antiochus
Korchnoi vs World Champions Decisive Games Petrosian
from Korchnoi vs World Champions Decisive Games by visayanbraindoctor
Mil y Una Partidas 1960-1974
by K9Empress


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC