Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Akiba Rubinstein vs Fyodor Ivanovich Dus Chotimirsky
St. Petersburg (1909), St. Petersburg RUE, rd 9, Feb-26
Tarrasch Defense: Two Knights Variation (D32)  ·  0-1



explore this opening
find similar games 10 more Rubinstein/Dus Chotimirsky games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can make these tips go away by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page. Simply check the option "Don't show random tips on game pages." and click the Update Profile button at the bottom.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
Jan-01-03  ughaibu: Dus Chotimirsky's claim to fame was that he was the only player to win against Rubinstein at St Petersburg 1909 and in the same tournament the only player other than Rubinstein to win against Lasker. According to Lasker Rubinstein was winning comfortably until miscalculating on (I think) move 15.
Dec-02-05  Whitehat1963: Excellent and interesting game! Rubinstein takes a whipping with white during his best year.
Dec-02-05  dr. micha: yes, white was tactically outplayed.probably the middlegame was too chaotic for Akiba.
Premium Chessgames Member
  shalgo: Lasker says that white would "have maintained his extra Pawn" had Rubinstein played 19.Qc4. He also claims that Rubinstein still had a draw with 20.Qa6 Nd4 21.Nxc3 b4 22.e3 (the rest of his line seems garbled in my copy of the tournament book).
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: The tournament book is available online at The note mentioned by <shalgo> is a bit garbled, but I think I've deciphered it. The position in question arises after 19...b5:

click for larger view

<Here Rubinstein, who is usually a very calm and clear player, makes a mistake in his combination and loses by force. He might have played 20.Qa6 Nd4 21.Nxc3 b4 22.e3 bxc3 23.exd4 (not 23.Rxb8 Qxb8 followed by ...Qb2) 23...Rxb1 (23...Qxd4 24.Rxb8 Rxb8 25.Qc6) 24.Rxb1 (24.dxe5 Rxc1+ 25.Bf1 c2) 24...Qxd4 and might have drawn by 25.Qe2.>

Basically, it looks likel a move was left out in the book and there was no clear distinction between the main variation and sub-variations.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Calli: <a bit garbled> Not as garbled as having two white queens in the diagram.

(we leave no well-intentioned posts go unpunished) :-D

Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: Augghhhhh! Will I never be able to type an entire post without a typo????

OK, everybody, please imagine the queen on e5 is Black, and don't make me redo the whole thing.

Jan-20-09  ughaibu: We could punish Calli for falling between two stools with "leave. . . go", rather than choosing 'leave' or 'let. . . go'. I've included an inaccuracy, in this post, in case anyone would like to punish me too.
Jan-26-09  A.G. Argent: <ughaibu> Ok, Mr. Grammar, I may be a chronic patzer when it comes to chess but I know a superfluous, comma when I see, one but, it, is well placed, I must say; right after inaccuracy.,
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <Phony Benoni: The tournament book is available online at;

Wow, thanks for pointing that out! Now if only Google could get its clutches on Tarrasch's Nuremburg 1896 book...

Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: My question is whether White had more than a draw after 19...b5

Did some long analysis with Rybka 3 (request someone check with Houdini, as it freezes my computer for some reason)

20 Qh4 f5

(there is no time for 20...b4 as 21 Nf4 Qg5 22 Bxc6 wins a piece)

21 Nxe7 Nxe7

22 Qb4 Rbc8

(if 22...Rfc8 23 f8(Q) deflects the guard on c3)

23 Qb5 Rc5

24 Qd3 Kg7

25 Rb7 Rfc8

26 f4 Qf6

27 e4

click for larger view

In comparison with the 20 Qa6 variations, White has avoided bishops of opposite squares, and the further analysis shows his initiative is unstoppable.

27...fxe4 28 Bxe4 R5-c7 29 Rxc7 Qb6+ 30 Kg2 Qxc7 31 Qb5 Ng6 32 Qe8 Nf8 33 Bd5 Rd8 34 Qe4 3.06/20

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Rubinstein's only defeat St Petersburg 1909; interesting start
from Game collection: GDQ by fredthebear
April, p. 79 [Game 78 / 1614]
from American Chess Bulletin 1909 by Phony Benoni
Round 9
from St Petersburg 1909 by JoseTigranTalFischer
by ughaibu
Easy Dus it! Selected Games of Dus-Chotimirsky
by Resignation Trap
from 59_Fixit with ..c4! - the Stockholm/Lima Syndrom by whiteshark
Rubinstein's only defeat St Petersburg 1909; interesting start
from What truck? by fredthebear
98_D34_Tarrasch Defense of QGD
by whiteshark
by oao2102
Round 9
from St Petersburg 1909 by Archives

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us

Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC