Alexander Shabalov vs Keith Arkell (1991)

Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players ·

Kibitzing

Alexander Shabalov vs Keith Arkell
15th Lloyds Bank Masters Open (1991), London ENG, rd 7, Aug-23
Caro-Kann Defense: Advance Variation. Botvinnik-Carls Defense (B12) · 1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening	find similar games	1,887 more games of Shabalov
sac: 21.Na6	PGN: download \| view \| print	Help: general \| java-troubleshooting

TIP: To see the raw PGN for this game, click on the PGN: view link above.

For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE. [CLICK HERE]

< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 1 OF 2 · Later Kibitzing>
May-06-04		Chessical: Shabalov makes Black's variation seem very unimpressive in a grandmasterly and smooth performance. The clearance sacrifice with the N on move 21 is very nice. <22.Rc7> f5 23.Rxd5 f4+ 24.Kh3 exd5+ 25.e6 and it is all over.

Dec-26-05		Timothy Glenn Forney: Yes a great example of keeping the opponents king from castling and the Knight sac to utilize the rooks in the open files for mate.Shabalov was taught by the best,Tal I believe.

Jan-22-06		Timothy Glenn Forney: White's next move is the clincher,♖xd5!! black can only sac the ♕ at d2 to intercede the mate threat.Black could move f5 with Mate coming in 6 moves--22...f5 23.♖xd5 f4+ 24.♔h3 exd5+ 25. e6 ♕xg2 26.♔xg2 ♗d7 27.♖xd7 ♖f8 28.♕ e7#

Jan-22-06		pawn to QB4: Wow. In the North of England Keith Arkell's generally considered a very hard man to beat, and a Caro Kann expert. 21. Na6 looks like the work of Tal's pupil. Puzzle of the day?

Jun-14-09		YoungEd: Will someone who knows the Caro-Kann please explain Black's 3rd to me? Look like he's just a tempo behind an Advance French; I don't see any advantage. thanks.

Jun-20-09		ToTheDeath: <YoungEd:> It's not so simple- Black will be able to develop his light squared bishop, the main problem for Black in the French defense. Here Black should have playe more solidly though with 5...e6, when the bishop is not so great on b5. Nice game.

Feb-15-10		Derek880: 18 Rxd5!! exd5 19 e6! fxe6 (19...Bxe6 20 Nd4 ) 20 Nxe6 Bxe6 21 Qxe6+ Kd8 (21...Kf8 22 Ne5 Qe8 23 Nd7+ ) 22 Rd1

Sep-19-21		Brenin: My choice was not Shabalov's 18 c4, but the very tempting 18 Rxd5 exd5 19 e6, e.g. 19 ... Bxe6 20 Nxe6 fxe6 21 Qxe6+ Kf8 22 Ne5, or 21 ... Kd8 22 Rd1.

Sep-19-21		OhioChessFan: c4 was pretty easy to spot. The followup, not so much.

Sep-19-21		Stanco: <Brenin> I also played 18. Rxd5 😉 18....exd5 19. e6 Bxe6 20. Nxe6 fxe6 21. Qxe6+ Kf8 22. Ne5! 1:0

Sep-19-21		An Englishman: Good Evening: Also thought that 18.Rxd5 wins. What did we miss?

Sep-19-21		ndg2: Engine doesn't like 5..♕a5+ at all, thinks immediate 5..e6 is necessary. After the game move SF 14 thinks white is already at +1.5.

Sep-19-21		murkia: <An Englishman> According to the engine you missed nothing! Also my choice together with Brenin and Stanco. What good company :-)

Sep-19-21		mel gibson: I saw 18. Rxd5. Stockfish 14 was jumping between 2 different solutions: 18. Rxd5 and 18 c4. Therefore I will give both solutions: 18. Rxd5 (18. Rxd5 (♖d1xd5 e6xd5 e5-e6 f7xe6 ♘f3-d4 ♖a8-a6 ♘d4xb5 ♖a6xd6 ♘b5xd6+ ♔e8-e7 ♘d6xb7 a5xb4 a3xb4 ♖h8-f8+ ♔f2-e3 e6-e5 ♖a1-a7 ♖f8-f4 ♘b7-a5+ ♔e7-d6 c2-c4 d5xc4 ♘c5-e4+ ♔d6-d5 ♘e4-c3+ ♔d5-e6 ♖a7-c7 ♗c8-d7 ♘a5-b7 ♗d7-e8 ♘c3-e4 ♔e6-d5 ♖c7-c5+ ♔d5-e6 ♘b7-d8+ ♔e6-d7 ♘d8-c6 ♖f4-h4 h2-h3 c4-c3 ♘c6xe5+ ♔d7-d8 ♔e3-d4 c3-c2 ♖c5xc2 ♗e8-g6 ♘e5xg6 h7xg6 b4-b5) +6.83/39 627) score for White +6.83 depth 39. 2nd solution: 18. c4 (18. .. Qxc4 (♕b5xc4 ♖a1-c1 ♕c4-a2+ ♔f2-g3 h7-h5 h2-h3 ♖h8-h6 ♔g3-h2 ♕a2-e2 ♘f3-d4 ♕e2-e3 ♘c5-a6 f7-f6 ♘d4xe6 ♕e3xe5+ ♕d6xe5 f6xe5 ♘a6-c7+ ♔e8-e7 ♘c7xd5+ ♔e7xe6 ♘d5-c7+ ♔e6-f5 ♘c7xa8 a5xb4 ♖d1-f1+ ♔f5-g5 ♖c1xc8 b4xa3 ♖c8-e8 ♖h6-c6 ♖e8xe5+ ♔g5-h6 ♖e5-b5 ♖c6-c2 ♖f1-a1 ♖c2-b2 ♖b5-b6+ ♖b2xb6 ♘a8xb6 h5-h4 ♖a1xa3 ♔h6-g6 ♘b6-d5 ♔g6-f5 ♖a3-f3+ ♔f5-e4 ♘d5-e7 b7-b5 ♖f3-f7) -7.38/32 207) score for Black -7.38 depth 32.

Sep-19-21		agb2002: White has a knight for a bishop. White has Rxd5 (to eliminate an important piece and to open the position), c4 (to open the c-file) and Nd4 (aiming at c6). ----- 18.Nd4 is met with 18... Qb6, trading queens (18... Qc4 19.Nc6 Qxc2+ 20.Kg1 Bxc6 21.Qxc6+ Ke7 [only move not to lose the queen] 22.Qxa8 looks winning [the queen also controls g2 in the case of ... Ne3]). ----- 18.c4 Qxc4 19.Rac1 and if 19... Qa2+ 20.Kg1 Qxa3 (20... Ne3 21.Qd8#) 21.Na6 bxa6 (21... Rxa6 22.Rxc8#) 21.Qc6+ looks winning. ----- In the case of 18.Rxd5 exd5 19.e6: A) 19... Bxe6 20.Nxe6 fxe6 21.Qxe6+ Kd8 (21... Kf8 22.Ne5 Qe8 23.Nd7+ winning) 22.Rxd1 looks winning. For example 22... Kc7 23.Rxd5 Qc6 24.Qe5+ Kb6 25.Rd6 wins decisive material. B) 19... fxe6 20.Nxe6 Qd7 (20... Bxe6 transposes to A) 21.Nc7+ Kd8 (21... Kf7 22.Ne5+ wins decisive material) 22.Qxd7+ Bxd7 23.Nxa8, followed by Nb6, wins decisive material. C) 19... f6 20.Ne4 (20.Rd1 Qc6) 20... Qc4 21.Rd1 looks very good for White. For example, 21... axb4 22.Nxb7 Bxb7 23.Qd7+ Kf8 24.Qf7#. D) 19... Qc4 20.exf7+ Kxf7 21.Ng5+ Ke8 (21... Kg8 22.Qd8#) 22.Re1+ Qe4 23.Ncxe4 wins. ----- I'd play 18.Rxd5. It looks strongest to me.

Sep-19-21		agb2002: <mel gibson> According to DroidFish even 18.Nd4 is a solution: after 18... Qb6 it found the interesting 19.Nf5 (19... Qxd6 20.Nxd6+ Ke7 21.c4 Nb6 [21... Nc7 22.Ndxb7] 22.Rab1 > +3.0).

Sep-19-21		Teyss: I'm in the <18.Rxc5 exd5 19.e6> gang. Saw most variations from there on but not in detail as <agb2002> as usual, soo cannot say I really solved it. Still, rather easy for a Sunday. Nice combination. 20...axb4 is not the best move but the position is lost anyhow. 21.Na6 clearing the c column and threatening Nc7+ followed by mate is pretty. Of course 21.Nxe6? fails to Bxe6 (not fxe6?? 22.Rxc8+ Rxc8 23.Qxe6+).

Sep-19-21		mel gibson: < agb2002: <mel gibson> According to DroidFish even 18.Nd4 is a solution: after 18... Qb6 it found the interesting 19.Nf5 (19... Qxd6 20.Nxd6+ Ke7 21.c4 Nb6 [21... Nc7 22.Ndxb7] 22.Rab1 > +3.0).> Thanks - 18.Nd4 ? Stockfish 14 is giving a score of -5.00 for Black so yes that is still a good move.

Sep-19-21		Teyss: <mel gibson> Thanks for posting SF results, it's useful for complex positions, but why do you say "score of -5.00 for Black" instead of +5.00 as engines put it? Apologies if the question is irrelevant, I don't know much about computers.

Sep-19-21		mel gibson: < Teyss: <mel gibson> Thanks for posting SF results, it's useful for complex positions, but why do you say "score of -5.00 for Black" instead of +5.00 as engines put it? Apologies if the question is irrelevant, I don't know much about computers.> That is what my Arena interface shows as a result. You can take it as +5.00 for White or -5.00 for Black.

Sep-19-21		nalinw: A great puzzle - there is also a queen trapping theme. The fact that there are two solutions makes it more interesting ....

Sep-19-21		chrisowen: Epicentre i ooh evicts pc4 faiths goodness evicts its aha its arrives variable its hark fondue its epicentre i evicts ooh evicts fink its knighted its inks gobbed it starry bats evicts bastard its tray ooh its marry its mew chopper hull its hello evicts ooh joules its jacques its glimmer vagrant packed its bretonnian its wobble evicts its whoosh hunky its ask again gamble crude it rescind deffy its cuff good its mecs evicts feels it ah in more chalk badge its budge its hard other ooh huddle hovels etcetera either axiom its jewel flung pc4 within.

Sep-19-21		chrisowen: No hog its v coat be jees it stayin alive no?

Sep-19-21		chrisowen: Nuff it spruced it in up again tiddler picked it a d5 eli calm good no?

Sep-19-21		landshark: I seldom try to pursue Sunday puzzles to a conclusive result - today 18.Rxd5 stood out to me as a really good try, seeing how that N was B's only decent defender. I was going to go into guess-the-move mode after the expected 18.Rxd5 - was surprised by the beautiful play following 18.c4. Not sure I would have taken the time to follow up my line with <Brenin> and <agb> and some of the other class commentators 19.e6! I find I'm actually pretty good at finding first moves in complex puzzles <and> in real games - only to go seriously astray in the follow-up.

search thread:
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 1 OF 2 · Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
Nothing in violation of United States law.
No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
No trolling.
The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.