chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Wolfgang Uhlmann vs Thomas Paehtz Sr
Halle DSV (1974), Halle GDR, Sep-??
Dutch Defense: Queen's Knight Variation (A85)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 13 more Uhlmann/T Paehtz Sr games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: The Olga viewer allows you to get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" link on the lower right.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 1 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jan-18-08  dzechiel: White to move. Material even. "Difficult."

Well, the more I look at this, the more I feel that the black king is not subject to direct attack (things like 30 Bh6+ pretty much go nowhere).

Once the king is eliminated as a target, the only thing in black's position that looks dicey is the knight. It is pinned against the black queen in such a manner, that black cannot break the pin without dropping the horse.

With that in mind, I would like to attack the knight with another piece and win it outright. But, black can play ...e5 putting another defender on the piece (and a pawn at that). Therefore I think white's first move should be

30 Be6

blocking the e-pawn. Black still can't move the knight without losing the queen, so next move I plan to play 31 Rad1. Is there anything black can do? I suspect he will play something like

30...Nxe6 31 Bxb6 Bxa1

But now

32 Rxa1 Rxb6

allows the coup de grâce

33 Qd4+ and 34 Qxb6.

This position seemed much easier than yesterday's to me. I hope I haven't made any glaring errors. Time to check.

Jan-18-08  dzechiel: Yup, it seemed too easy. The idea was right, but I overlooked black's 30...Qc5 resource. Oh, well, it was a good run.
Jan-18-08  zooter: hmmm...time for me to throw in the towel on this one as it's quite difficult...but

30.Qd2 seems like a good attacking move which i'd proably play...let me see

Jan-18-08  zooter: <30 Be6

blocking the e-pawn. Black still can't move the knight without losing the queen, so next move I plan to play 31 Rad1. Is there anything black can do? I suspect he will play something like

30...Nxe6 31 Bxb6 Bxa1

But now

32 Rxa1 Rxb6

allows the coup de grâce

33 Qd4+ and 34 Qxb6. >

Qd4+ is not possible because of the black knight at e6

Oh well, even i was thinking of something as simple as 30.Rad1 but 30...e5 effectively ends white's attack on the knight...Why oh Why did I not think of Be6 not letting the pawn move..!!!

Jan-18-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  al wazir: So, why didn't white play the immediate 29. Be6 ? If 29...Qe5, then 30. Bd5. Now if 30...Ne6, then 31. f4 wins the ♘. If 30...e6, then 31. f4 Nxe2+ (forced) 32. Qxe2 Qc3 33. Bc6.
Jan-18-08  TrueBlue: ok, I know this is not the solution, but in real game I will go for the a5 pawn, e.g. Ra4 followed by Rfa1. I like how the black queen is pinned, so I wouldn't touch that.
Jan-18-08  dzechiel: <zooter: Qd4+ is not possible because of the black knight at e6>

This gets worse and worse. <sigh> It really was too easy. I promise to try harder tomorrow.

Jan-18-08  Confuse: I too was trying to think of a way to block that pawn, while missing the Qc5 defense. It seems easy to see all the good points of ones decisions, while missing certain points (Qc5) : )
Jan-18-08  chopbox: I just love White's 32nd and 33rd moves. I considered 32 Bd5 to be evidence that White had achieved nothing by his earlier 30 Be6. (That is, I wouldn't have played 30 Be6 because it seemed to me that Black could just force the bishop back to d5.) Now here's the question I need to answer of myself: was it because of this that I never got to imagine the simple and fatal 33 f4 or was it because I couldn't see 33 f4 that I decided 32 Bd5 was a nonstarter? While I think on that, I think I'll just enjoy the beauty of those two moves.
Jan-18-08  Boerboel Guy: Happy to say that I got this one too...
after first checking all the ridiculeous sacs!
Jan-18-08  NakoSonorense: I looked at this puzzle for about ten minutes, but I couldn't see the solution.

I need new eyes. :(

Jan-18-08  willyfly: This was more like a clever game segment than a puzzle.
Jan-18-08  whiteshark: My "thinking eyes" can't spot it, too.
Jan-18-08  RandomVisitor: After 29...Qb6:


click for larger view

Rybkav2.3.2a.x64:

(23-ply)
1. (2.45): 30.Be6 Qc5 31.Rfd1 Nxe6 32.Bxc5 Nxc5 33.Qe3 a4 34.Ra3 Rb7 35.Qd2 Rc7 36.Kg2 Ne4 37.Qb4 Rfc8 38.Rc1 Nc5 39.h4 Rb7 40.Rd1 Rb6 41.Rh1

2. (2.20): 30.Rfd1 e5 31.Bd2 e4 32.Qe3 Be5 33.Bxa5 Qc5 34.Ra2 Rfc8 35.Bc3 Nxb5 36.Qxc5 Rxc5 37.Bxe5+ dxe5 38.cxb5 Rcxb5 39.Kg2 Rb2 40.Rda1 Kh6 41.Rxb2 Rxb2 42.Ra2 Rxa2

3. (2.01): 30.Rfb1 e5 31.Qd2 Kh8 32.Bh6 Rfe8 33.e3 Ne6 34.Qxa5 Nc5 35.Qxb6 Rxb6 36.Ra7 e4 37.Kg2 Bc3 38.Bg5 Reb8

Jan-18-08  Prudov: My first thought was sacrificing the exchange by 30. Rxa5 Qxa5 31. Bxd4, with the possibility Ra1 etc. However, Black answers 30. ... Ne2+ and the plan does not work.
Jan-18-08  Sularus: My first move: 30. Be6.
But i chose to move Rfd1 after that instead of Rad1.

now its time to see how the game went.

Jan-18-08  realbrob: The first 2 moves I considered were:

1)30.Be6, because it seemed a nice square for the bishop and the black N couldn't take it. Unfortunately I thought this should be followed by some weird attack or sac, like 31.Bxf5, but it made no sense. 2)30.Rfd1, to attack the pinned piece. Of course this was a beginner move because Black can safely play 30..e5.

Afterwards I wondered, "What would Tal do?" and thought of some crazy attacks like 30.Rxa5 Qxa5 31.Bxd4 Bxd4 32.Qxd4+ , but after 32..e5 White has nothing, he just lost the exchange for a pawn.

Unfortunately I missed the obvious connection between my first 2 candidate moves. 30.Be6 is the conditio sine qua non to attack the pinned N with a rook!

What can I do now? Maybe I could try and justify my stupidity saying that I analysed the position without a board for just 10 minutes..

Jan-18-08  handro1104: <dzechiel> Your analysis is always instructive, but sometimes it is too late to see it. Why don't you post your analysis in your web page?
Jan-18-08  johnlspouge: Material: White has B for N. The salient feature of the position is the pinned Nd4. Nothing else suggests itself for immediate attack. Thus,

30.Be6

removing the possibility of solid reinforcement for the N with e5.

The various defenses fail.

31.Ne7+ or Nf6+ throws the N for at most a P

31.d4 cxd4 threatening Rad1 to finish the N, with the threat Bxd4 followed by Bxf6+ robbing Black of the tempo required to relieve the pin by moving the Q.

Time to peek. The game continuation required more patience than I had for the analysis today, but it does make clear why this was a Friday puzzle.

I would welcome <thoughtful> insights from practical players on how much Uhlmann calculated over the board. The absence of any real possibility other than 30.Be6 made the move seem easy to choose and play.

Jan-18-08  Alphastar: After pondering for a while I decided upon 1. Be6!? with the idea of blocking the e7-pawn so that black can't play ..e5 to protect the d4-knight when it needs protection. White need not fear any knight discoveries upon the a1-rook because it will leave the black queen en prise in any case. maybe 1. ..d5!? is the best defense but after 2. cxd5! I still don't see an adequate response for black to Rfd1 and Bxd4. Time to check.

------------

Well, the ingame defense seems very artifical to me. I would expect an engine to play it.

Jan-18-08  tjshann: Woke up to learn that Bobby Fischer passed away, at 64. A chess genius who enormously contributed to the popularity of chess in this country during the last century. But his accomplishments over the board were marred by controversy in his final years. His record against Uhlmann was 3+,4= and 1 loss.
Jan-18-08  A.G. Argent: Yes, a very, very dark day for the chess world. I'm still in a mild state of shock. Condolences to any and all concerned.
Jan-18-08  zb2cr: Oh dear. I just played 30. Rfd1 without any thought for the in-between move 30. Be6, blocking the advance of Black's Pawn.
Jan-18-08  Amarande: Didn't see Be6.

Initially considered Rfd1, but after seeing that the reinforcement allows e5, I would have instead played Rad1. After 30 Rad1 e5 (forced) 31 f4 then forces open a file for attack, since 31 ... e4 loses the knight after 32 Qd2 (careful, careful - 32 Qc3? Nxe2+ 33 Kf2 Nxc3 34 Bxb6 Nxd1+ and White loses a Rook. Even if 33 Kg2 instead, so Nxd1 is not check, White still loses the Rook since he can't both save his Bishop and take Black's Knight).

Indeed after 30 Rad1 e5 31 f4, White gets not only the f-file, but the d-file as well, since Black will be forced to play dxe5 after the Pawn exchange. Two Bishops, open lines, more secure King, possible direct attack after that? Whereas in the actual game while White has won a piece, it seems like it's going to be a long slog to convert it to a win (there is a lack of open lines still, and Black has a worrying outside passed pawn) ...

Jan-18-08  kevin86: I had not a clue on this one. It looks like the queen is lured to e5 and trapped-escape comes only at the loss of a piece.
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 1 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC