Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Karl August Walbrodt vs Siegbert Tarrasch
Nuremberg m (1894), Nuremberg GER, rd 5, Aug-07
Tarrasch Defense: Symmetrical Variation (D32)  ·  0-1



explore this opening
find similar games 14 more K A Walbrodt/Tarrasch games
sac: 56...Rxf2 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can display posts in reverse order, by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page and checking the option "Display newest kibitzes on top."

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <The principles of the positional school, expressed in simple instructional form by Tarrasch, became inviolable axioms of chess to many of his contemporaries. And thus came the misconception, which persists to this day, of the "consistent" game, in which one player carries out, from beginning to end, his logical plan, almost as if he were demonstrating a theorum of geometry.

In the annotations of such an "ideal" game, one player always appears as the keeper of principle, the other as its transgressor. The "good" player then accumulates his positional advantages and places them in a vault, much as if he were saving to buy a motorcycle. Having accumulated the proper amount, he then launches a combinative attack, winding it up with an instructive mate, or with a still more instructive win of the exchange. And just what, you may ask, was his opponent doing all this time? Why gazing phlegmatically at his backward pawns and poorly-placed pieces, shrugging his shoulders, and then finally: "Black resigns.">

-- David Bronstein, "In Lieu of a Preface," _Zurich International Chess Tournament 1953_.

This game approximates Bronstein's half-mocking description, except that it is White who resigns. Some minor inaccuracies lead to a bad IQP formation for White -- 14. dxc5? Qb7. After that it's just relentless technique, as Tarrasch leaves White with a terrible bishop to go along with his isolated pawn, and eventually -- instructively! -- he wins the exchange.

Fritz doesn't like 16....e5, perhaps because it opens a diagonal for the White KB. Not sure if its evaluation is justified. Other than the sixteenth move, Fritz finds absolutely nothing wrong with Black's moves. Tarrasch had an unmatched faculty for games like this, which indeed seems more like a demonstration of a theorum than a contest between two players.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Game 284
from Three Hundred Chess Games (Tarrasch) by Qindarka
Game 284
from Tarrasch's 300 Chess Games by yesthatwasasac
98_D34_Tarrasch Defense of QGD
by whiteshark
Game 284
from Three Hundred Chess Games (Tarrasch) by Incremental
Nice Tarrasch game as black
from layson27's favorite games by layson27
Game 5
from Tarrasch-Walbrodt (1894) by keypusher

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us

Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC