chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Walter John vs Georg Marco
Coburg (Meisterturnier) (1904), Coburg GER, rd 8, Jul-26
Spanish Game: Closed Variations. Morphy Attack (C78)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 1 more W John/G Marco game
sac: 12...Nxg4 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can learn a lot about this site (and chess in general) by reading the Chessgames Help Page. If you need help with premium features, please see the Premium Membership Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jun-26-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  Chessical: There is a idea (expressed for instance by Max Euwe), that there was a danger of death by draw to chess in the period immediately preceding the First World War.

The technical refinement of positional play, coupled with a restricted opening repetoire with relatively few critical lines, was supposed to categorise the master play of the period. I do not believe that this is true; many of the games in this period were enegetic. This is such a game.

John plays <g4> in a Spanish to initiate K-side expansion, and Marco sacrifces a knight to capture that pawn, opening up John's K to a dangerous, but in the end a speculative, attack. Both players ignore drawing lines in the effort to win.

<12....Nxg4>, is Marco's all or nothing alternative to 12...Bg6

<15.Rh1> seizing the h file, may have been more flexible than congesting his position by bringing the N to e2 intending Ng3.

Trying to gain control of the dark squares on the K-side does not appear to work either:

<18.Qe1> f4 19.Bf2 Rf6 20.Bd5 (20.Kh2? Rh6) 20...Rg6+ 21.Kh2 Bxf3 22.Nxf3 Rh6+ 23.Kg1 Qh3

<20.Nf2> does not work against the threat of <g4>: 20.Nf2 g4 21.Nc3 gxf3+ 22.Kh2 Bh4

<23...Bf7> 24.Bc3+ Ne5 25.Bxf7 is equal

<24.Ng6+> Kg7 25.Nxe7 Qxe7 26.Bh6+ Kh8 27.Bxf8 Rxf8 28.Qd2 =

<24...Bf6?> should lose (<24...Ne6>=) to 25.Ng6+ Kg7

<26.Qd2?> what did John see? Why not <26.Nxf8> Rxf8, followed by 27.Qd2? Now it is all downhill for him after <26...Bh3+>

Marco easily avoids <27...Kxg6?> 28.Rag1+ Kh5 29.Bxf6

Jan-06-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: <<26.Qd2?> what did John see? Why not <26.Nxf8> Rxf8, followed by 27.Qd2? Now it is all downhill for him after <26...Bh3+> >

I understand bad moves when you don't foresee the opponent's response. But I have no clue what John could have possibly intended there.

Jan-07-06  Holden: Qd2 looks like a move worthy of consideration as a candidate move; granted, it clearly doesn't work because of ...Bh3+, but I can see what might have looked attractive about it. It threatens Qh6#, and the knight cannot be captured because the queen still mates.

Unfortunately, ...Bh3+ removes the mate threat, picks up a tempo, and the knight falls.

This is an example of the importance of always doing a routine scan of all checks and captures on every candidate move BEFORE playing the move.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
August, p. 60 [Game 174]
from American Chess Bulletin 1904 by Phony Benoni
Round 8 (Tuesday, July 26)
from Coburg 1904 by Phony Benoni

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC