chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

William Norwood Potter vs NN
"Potter's Field" (game of the day Mar-28-2006)
London (1870) (unorthodox), London ENG
Chess variants (000)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

find similar games 987 more games of NN
sac: 9.Nb5+ PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jan-03-09  WhiteRook48: best to let the knight go so you're still up in material and can catch up in development 6...f5! knows the Q advantage
Jan-05-09  WhiteRook48: it might have been better to play 5...Nxc4
Jan-05-09  WhiteRook48: what's even funnier is white never took the hanging black queen!
Jan-06-09  WhiteRook48: analysis:
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4!
Hello f7.
3...Nf6 4. Nc3 Na5?! (NN moves a piece twice in the opening) 5. Nxe5 Nxe4? ...Nxc4 6. Nxc4 removes the bishop and white cannot zero in on f7. 6. d3 Nc5?? As in my earlier post, 6...f5 is better as NN takes advantage of the odds. Or does that run into the same mate? Okay, Be7. now white announces mate in 7 and NN is helpless.
Jan-20-09  WhiteRook48: why not 2...d5?
Jan-31-09  WhiteRook48: nice king hunt anyhow
Aug-17-09  solskytz: As Chernev put it, this is the rare game where the forced mating sequence is longer than the earlier part of the game.

That's quite a challenge, start down a queen and arrive in six moves to a situation where you have a forced mate in nine.

Aug-17-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: <solskytz> We had a recent example of the same idea as the game of the day: J Reinisch vs Traxler, 1890 Black plays eight moves, then forces mate in nine. While he didn't start down a queen, he did passively sacrifice her, which counts for something.
Aug-22-09  solskytz: Sure, a great one indeed.
Mar-19-11  Tigranny: No offense, but surely NN could've won had he/she developed his pieces better.
Aug-17-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheTamale: Absolutely horrible. I dare say most of us could have beaten this NN under the same conditions.
Aug-17-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Robed.Bishop: <TheTamale> Given that white spotted NN a queen, I'd say the players recognized black's inferior knowledge of the game.
Jun-30-13  siegbert: 5... Nxc4 is to be recommended !!!
Dec-29-17  MariusDaniel: Interesting considering the odds!
Dec-14-18  thisisasign: Jeez, just exchange your pieces! You've got queen odds for God's sake.
Dec-14-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  Dionysius1: A made up game don't you think? The opponent is not named, and every move from 7 to 14 is SF's first choice. (cough cough)
Dec-14-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  ChessHigherCat: <Dionysius1> The explanation is simple: NN is Harry Potter, who's magically forcing his father to make all the winning moves as a birthday present.
Dec-14-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  Dionysius1: It had to be something like that :-)
Dec-14-18  thisisasign: <Dionysius1> I agree. Most likely a composed game.
Dec-15-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  vonKrolock: There's a forced mate in nine after NN's sixth move ("queenies",: players who receive the odds of a whole ♕, are supposed to be nonamers too... <SF> was not in charge in 1870, but a mensch, a strong player, like Potter, certainly could find the forced sequence.
Dec-15-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  Dionysius1: I take your point <vonKrolock>. As an alternative reason for thinking it's a composed game, I find it hard to believe anyone competent enough to play Potter even in a casual game would be silly enough to allow 7. ♗xf7+ and 8 ♗g5+, handing back the ♕ he was spotted only 8 moves earlier.
Dec-15-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  vonKrolock: <Dionysius1> You're welcome! ... And who never played like NN ?! ...In my first game ever, I answered 1.e4 with 1...a5 and 2...Ra6, losing the exchange for a start. Later I allowed a family check perfectly defensible, and lost the Queen. And of course played on until the <#> ...
Dec-15-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  vonKrolock: <handing back the ♕> And Potter followed the <most substantial hunting first> principle...
Dec-15-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  Dionysius1: No no. In your first game you wouldn't have been offered the chance to play someone of the strength of Potter.

So NN would have had to be at least a competent club player. And they don't allow {7. Bf7+). Even in 1880 players knew to keep an eye on the KBP :-).

Dec-15-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  vonKrolock: Yes, he was not a master-level player - but at least a decent amateur, with enough patience to give some advices (I refused to take back moves...). Then I went after a couple of books, and prepared myself for a revenge in the first occasion. He politely declined the challenge, and picked his son instead (in his early teens he was a couple of years older than me) - who spanked me twice, with White and with Black. Well, this was the world of yesterday. Long before the computers.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 3)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: UNORTHODOX. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Giving Q odds still produces K walk
from Leearn Checkmates on the 3rd/6th Outer File by trh6upsz
Giving Q odds still produces K walk
from yttacks & Sacs f7/f2 -1st Edition by Fredthebear by fredthebear
Q Odds game. King Hunt. 15c
from Italian by PinkLedDoor
Game 5 [Chernev: White announced mate in nine after move 6]
from 1000 Best Short Games of Chess by joekenn
Potter gave Q odds, announced a forced mate at move 7!!!
from 1870s - 1890s Classic Chess Principles Arise by fredthebear
pf1450's favorite games
by pf1450
awesome long forced mate
from interesting by naruto00122
:throwing away a material advantage.
from Winning Chess Strategies. by just a kid
15 moves
from Chess Miniatures, Collection IV by FRoeten
Winning Chess Strategies Games
by rcmurphy
white wins with no queen
from amtr's favourite games by amtr
Potter mates in fifteen moves with queen odds.
from unique themes three by kevin86
March 28: Potter's Field
from Game of the Day 2006 by Phony Benoni
Queen odds
from Game of the Days by hidude
White gives Queen odds and mates in 15!!...(GOTD)
from Collections in Idleness 3 by kishchess


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC