Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Ralf Runau vs Schmidt
"Wreck-It Ralf" (game of the day Mar-14-2018)
W. Germany (1972)
Nimzowitsch Defense: Scandinavian. Exchange Variation (B00)  ·  1-0



explore this opening
find similar games 13 more games of R Runau
sac: 10.O-O PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Some games have annotation. These are denoted in the game list with the icon.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Nov-17-10  Lovuschka: The name of chess composer and master Peter Schmidt is wrongly associated with this game, it seems.
Premium Chessgames Member
  GrahamClayton: Amazing finish, with the promotion to a knight protecting the en-prise rook, and allowing checkmate to occur.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Mating Net: A tremendous under promotion. Black can't even counter sac his Queen to avoid disaster as his undeveloped kingside can't stop the b pawn or protect his King.
Apr-01-15  mikealando: Wow! That takes some deeper chess foresight!! Still amazed by this checkmate several years after I first came across it in the Mammoth Book of Chess by Graham Burgess. Thought to Google it today, recalling keywords Schmidt, Bundesliga and 1972. Thanks!!
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: Used this game here:

It is one of the most instructive games ever played. An ideal tool for someone coaching beginners.

Easy to remember and explain and that dramatic finish. it's the kind of game that can hook a beginner to chess for life. (40 years later they will hate you for showing it to them.)

Mar-14-18  areknames: Don't remember ever seeing this game before, pretty amazing stuff.
Mar-14-18  Steve.Patzer: Wow! Amazing finish
Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Evening: Such an astonishing game that it becomes easy to wonder if someone composed it, and if "Schmidt" is the German language equivalent of NN.

7.d5 appears in the CG database only in this game. In playing through it, believed that 5...e6 was safer, but it has fared poorly in the database. Perhaps 7...Bxe3 or 9...Qxb2 were the real mistakes?

Premium Chessgames Member
  piltdown man: Byutiful!
Premium Chessgames Member
  catlover: <An Englishman: it becomes easy to wonder if ..."Schmidt" is the German language equivalent of NN.> Could be. I'm told that is one of the most common last names in Germany. The Schmidt in this game sure played like the NN we all know and love.
Mar-14-18  morfishine: Either this was cleverly composed, (though useful from an instructive point of view), or simply:

Schmidt plays like S__t


Mar-14-18  Charlie Cheswick: Nice game! Thank you Sally Simpson for the link and that hilarious comment!
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: "Books have given both the BRD and the DDR as the site of this game, and the players' name have been reported as Schmid and Schmidt - and Runau, Rudnau, and Rundau! But they agree that it was played in 1972."

-- Hugh Edward Myers : Nimzovich's Defence to 1.e4, Caissa Editions, 1985, page 111 (game #32)

= = =

Schmidt* with all its homophonic variations is the most common family name in Germany. *(like Smith in the UK !?)

Mar-14-18  petemccabe: That is the most puzzle-like finish of an actual game I have ever seen.
Mar-14-18  morfishine: Piece of junk, totally composed
Mar-14-18  newzild: <<morfishine:> Piece of junk, totally composed>>

You must be a lot of fun at parties.

Mar-14-18  RookFile: I love the knight promotion at the end. Best part of the game.
Premium Chessgames Member
  ChessHigherCat: Knight-time rendezvous with death
Mar-15-18  Retireborn: I too would be inclined to query the authenticity of this game, but it's also true that this particular opening has produced some odd-looking finishes in the past;

Kiss vs G Barcza, 1934

And the Mieses-Schenk simul game given in the kibitz here.

Hans Georg Schenk

Mar-15-18  Cheapo by the Dozen: I don't think this game is NECESSARILY composed. The whole combination depends upon Black never having bothered to advance the e-pawn, but each move he didn't do it seems plausible, especially as he might have been planning a fianchetto instead.

Allowing d5 without having any decent squares for his knight is also somewhat plausible, as he might have been looking at an eventual ... Nb4.

Jul-10-18  SpiritedReposte: Yikes!
Sep-07-18  Petrosianic: Of course you don't need it on YouTube when you can see it here...
Sep-07-18  WorstPlayerEver: 7... e6 shows the importancy of square d5
Dec-08-18  newzild: Added to my Game Collection: The Best Games You've Never Heard Of
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <An Englishman> According to Komodo, Black could have achieved complete equality with 6...Qf5! In the game continuation, after 7.d5 (7.Be3 was better), 7...e6! would have equalized.

I don't subscribe to <morfishine>'s belief that this game was composed. People have played hundreds of billions of games. Inevitably, some of them are going to end in extraordinary finishes. I've only played tens of thousands of games, I suppose, but I've won three of them with O-O-O# and two games by capturing en passant with mate. See Game Collection: En passant mates, Game Collection: Mate by Castling, and In the last game, my opponent deliberately played ridiculous moves, so I would put an asterisk next to that one.

search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Nimzowitsch Def.: Scandinavian. Exchange (B00) 1-0 1 N# 1 N def
from Rgrrgrr at Fredthebear by fredthebear
98_B00/B01 (Best of) Scandinavian, Nimzowitsch,
by whiteshark
Nimzowitsch Def.: Scandinavian. Exchange (B00) 1-0 1 N# 1 N def
from Minors on the Back Rank Watching Fredthebear by fredthebear
Charming Miniatures. Compiled by Syracrophy.
by PinkLedDoor
85_#OTB_How to get away with Checkmate 2
by whiteshark
16 moves
from Chess Miniatures, Collection XII by wwall
Spectacular queen sacrifices
by obrit
Q-sac followed by underpromotion
from miniatures by goodevans
A tremendous sacrificial attack ends with a startling checkmate
from The Best Games You've Never Heard Of by newzild
Jarman's favorite games
by Jarman
Tremendous Miniature
from Scandinavian Sensations by Mating Net
Adrian Chantler's favorite games
by Adrian Chantler

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us

Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC