chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Edward Lasker vs Georg Rotlewi
Hauptturnier-A (1910), Hamburg GER
Italian Game: Scotch Gambit. Max Lange Attack Long Variation (C55)  ·  1/2-1/2

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 317 more games of Ed. Lasker
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Premium members can see a list of all games that they have seen recently at their Game History Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Sep-19-10  backrank: The game score given here is thoroughly incomplete. The remaining moves were 41. ♔e3 ♘g5
42. ♔f4 ♘h3+ 43. ♔g3 ♘g5 44. ♔g4 ♘e4 45. f3 ♘f6+ 46. ♔f5 ♔e7 47. f4 ♘d7 48. ♘d3 ♘f8 49. ♘c5 b6 50. ♘d3 a5 51. ♔e5 c6 52. ♔f5 ♘e6 53. ♘e5 c5 54. ♘c4 b5 55. ♘xa5 c4 56. ♔e5 ♘c5 57. ♘c6+ ♔f8 58. ♘a7 b4 59. ♔d4 c3 60. bxc3 ♘e6+ 61. ♔c4 bxc3 62. ♔xc3 ♘xf4 1/2-1/2

One can observe that Ed. Lasker made serious and interesting winning attempts, throwing it all away with his rash 58. move. The game is annotated by himself in his book 'Chess secrets (I learned from the masters)'. Anyway, the endgame is highly instructive, and from move 49 on he included it in his classic work 'Chess strategy'.

Aug-03-12  backrank: Now I observe that the game score has been completed. Thank you, chessgames.com !
Jul-26-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: This is a superb game. White's e pawn has a charmed life.
Jul-26-17  JimNorCal: Lasker missed a win as given by game notes in a couple of his books. Truly an absorbing and hard fought struggle though.
Dec-03-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  NM JRousselle: 31 f4 has to the path to victory.

31 f4 Ne2+ 32 Kf2 Nf4 33 Kf3 Re5 34 Kf4 looks strong for White.

Oct-05-23
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: As NM JRouselle and Edward Lasker <Chess Secrets I Learned From the Masters> pointed out, 31.f4 was winning. Even though White winds up a pawn down after 31.f4 Ne2+ 32.Kf2 Nxf4 33.Kf3 Rxe5 34.Kxf4 Re2 35.h4 Rxb2 36.Rxd3 Rxa2, he wins easily because his pawns are further advanced.

After 31.Nxd3 Rxg4+ Lasker forged on through a long tricky ending, reaching this position:


click for larger view

Rotlewi had just played 57....Ke7-f8, Lasker explains, <To give me as few checking opportunities as possible.>

Lasker played 58.Na7 (Oh rashness of youth! he writes), and Rotlewi forced an immediate draw with 58....b4 59.Kd4 c3 60.bxc3 Ne6+! 61.Kc4 bxc3 62.Kxc3 Nxf4.

In this book, Lasker says that he had two plans he could have tried: (1) to try to force the f-pawn through (2) to let the f-pawn go and attack the black pawns with his king and knight.

The first would not have worked, he says, supplying the following variation: 58. f5 Nd3+ 59. Ke6 Nxb2 60. Ne5 Nd3 61. Nd7+ Kg8 62. f6 Nf4+ 63. Ke7 Ng6+ 64. Ke8 c3. White's knight has to retreat to b3 to guard the queening square, while the Black knight guards <White>'s queening square. If White's king goes after the black pawns, Black takes the f-pawn and the N+P v. N ending is an easy draw.

What he should have done, Lasker writes, is go after the Black q-side pawns while guarding his own: 58.Kd4 Nd3 59. Kc3 Nxf4 60. Na7 Ne2+ 61. Kd2 Nd4 62. a3 and both pawns, Lasker writes, will fall after 63.Kc3.

But as the meme goes, <Isn't there someone you forgot to ask?> Stockfish spoils the story: 62....Nb3+ 63.Kc3 Nc5 64.Nxb5 Na4+ 65.Kc2 Ke7


click for larger view

What can White do? Pushing the b-pawn is an instant draw, and the White king can't approach the black pawn. 66.Nc3 Nb6 67.a4 Kd6 68.a5 Na8 69.Ne4+ Kc6 doesn't get White anywhere. Lasker's winning line doesn't win.

But back up, SF says: 58.Kd4 Nd3 59.Na7, and if 59....Nxf4 60.Nxb5 Nd3 61.a4 Nxb2 62.a5 and White's king, knight and pawn are going to overpower Black's knight: 62....Nd3 63. Kxc4 Ne5+ 64. Kd5 Nd3 65. Kd6 Nb4 66. Kc5 Nd3+ 67. Kb6 Nb4 68. Nc3 Ke7 69. Kb5 Nc2 70. a6, etc.

Nor does 61....b4 62.Nc6 Nxb2 Nxb4 work, since Black's last pawn will soon fall.

SF also finds another win at move 58: Nd4 Nd3+ 59. Ke4 Nxb2 60. Nxb5 Ke7 61. Nc3 Nd3 62. Nd5+ Kd6 63. Kd4 Nb2 64. Nc3 Ke6 65. a4 and White will queen a pawn, with or without winning the Black c-pawn in the process.

But why do these lines work? Because Black's king is either late to the fray or doesn't show up at all. And why is that? Because Rotlewi stuck it on f8 <To give me as few checking opportunities as possible>(??). If instead 57....Kd7, the engine suggests, the game is drawn. For example: 58.Nd4 Nd3+ 59.Ke4 b4 60.b3 (a clever winning attempt, now that Nc6 is unplayable) 60....Kd6! and if 61.bxc4


click for larger view

61....Nxf4!! 62.Kxf4 Kc5

Believe it or not, that's a draw. For example: 63.Nb3+ Kxc4 64.Ke3 Kc3 65.Nc1 Kb2 66.Kd2 Kb1!


click for larger view

The pawn can't move, the knight can't abandon the pawn, the king can't abandon the knight.

The defense works, of course, because the Black king is active. Put it on f8 as in the game, and 58.Nd4 Nd3+ 59.Ke4 b4 60.b3 Nc1 61.bxc4 Nxa2 62.c5 and White will win.

The ending was probably drawn all the way from 31.Nxd3(?) to 57....Kf8(?).

I'm really enjoying Lasker's work. He lived a very interesting life around interesting people. And <Chess Secrets I Learned From Stockfish> would probably not sell a lot of copies. But it would be a damned good book.

Oct-06-23  Retireborn: <keypusher> Thank you. Another interesting aspect of the game is its connection to the game from the main tournament, as set out in the kibitzing there:-

Marshall vs Tarrasch, 1910

One wonders if Rotlewi was also aware of the earlier game. His 15...Be7 seems reasonable, if no stronger than Tarrasch's 15...d3.

Oct-06-23
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <Retireborn> Yes, in Chess Secrets Lasker has a funny story about Marshall showing off the Tarrasch game to him in appalling pidgin German. His own guess was that Rotlewi did not know about the earlier game.

Lasker also says that he got a telegram from the <beautiful and witty> wife of the philosopher Ernst Cassirer at the very point when he was trying to figure out how to continue after 15....Be7: <Immer mutig! Denken Sie nur an das alte Wort: Heute Rotlevi, morgen Totlevi!>. <Courage! Think of the old saying: Today Redlevi, tomorrow Deadlevi!> Apparently <Heute rot, morgen tot> is an old German saying, although a better translation is apparently <here today and gone tomorrow>.

SF does not particularly care for 15....Be7, thinks 16.Ng5 is not the best reply, and thinks 16....Qf4 is a downright blunder, since White is able to capture the e6 pawn with tempo. Hard to imagine any master playing this position accurately.

As Lasker points out, 25.Nf6 would have led to a winning ending after 25....Nd4 26.Rxe7 Nxf5 27.Rxg7 Nxg7, though SF thinks 28.h3 is a lot more accurate than Lasker's 28.Rd1.

Oct-16-23  Gaito:


click for larger view

BLACK TO MOVE

In this position Rotlewi played 15...Be7. When Dr. Tarrasch and Capablanca faced this position as Black against Frank J. Marshall (also in 1910), both masters played 15...d3, but they lost their respective games, although that had nothing to do with the move 15...d3, which seems to be Black's best move in this position. See the games in the following links:

Marshall vs Capablanca, 1910

Marshall vs Tarrasch, 1910

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC