chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
L H Deelman vs A Bleijkmans
NED corr (1887) (correspondence), Netherlands
Dutch Defense: General (A80)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Annotations by Stockfish (Computer).      [22610 more games annotated by Stockfish]

explore this opening
find similar games 4 more games of L H Deelman
sac: 38...Qe1+ PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you find a mistake in the database, use the correction form. There is a link at the bottom that reads "Spot an error? Please suggest your correction..." Avoid posting corrections in the kibitzing area.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

THIS IS A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE.   [CLICK HERE] FOR ORIGINAL.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Mar-05-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  gawain: This is terrific. The immediate...Qe1+ does not work but if Black begins with 37...Qe4+ White is helpless.
Mar-05-18  stst: An Installment Loan, need 2 stages to finish:
37........Qe4+
38.Ka1 (only sq.) Qe1+ again
39.NxQ but then RxN# as the K smothers himself, too deep to get out.
Mar-05-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  agb2002: Black has a bishop for a knight and a pawn.

White threatens Rxe7.

Black wins with 37... Qe4+ 38.Ka1 Qe1+ 39.Nxe1 Rxe1#.

The direct sacrifice 37.. Qe1+ would work if Black's c-pawn were on c4.

Mar-05-18  AlicesKnight: Not too hard once you see the ....e4 check first. Somebody please explain why not 34....Nxh4.
Mar-05-18  Boerboel Guy: <Gregor Samsa Mendel: 37 Rxh7 was a horrible blunder, especially for a correspondence game.> Exactly! and in fact 37 gxh7+! wins for White...
Mar-05-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: Most likely, the score has a typo and White's 34th move was Qh3 instead.
Mar-05-18  gofer: This is a <correspondence game> and white played <37 Rxh7??>

That is really bizarre!

<37 gxh7+ ...>

37 ... Kf8
38 h8=Q+ Kf7
39 Qh7+ Kf8
40 Qxf4+ mating

37 ... Kg7
38 h8=Q+ Rxh8 (Kf7 Qxf4+ mating)
39 Qf7+ Kxh6
40 Qf6+ +-

37 ... Kf7
38 Qxf4+ Kg7
39 h8=Q+ Rxh8
39 Rxh8 Kxh8
40 Qe5+ +-

<37 ... Kh8>
<38 Qxf4 ...>

White is winning this at a canter. How does someone miss the mating threat (after <37 Rxh7??>) during a correspondence game?!

Mar-05-18  goodevans: <34...Nf8??>, <35.Bxh7+??>, <36...Qe7??>, <37.Rxh7??>. Practically all of the last few moves before the finale were outright blunders.

I can only imagine that both players were in severe time trouble!

;o)

Mar-05-18  gofer: <perfidious:> You must be right!

It's a really good explanation for the difficulties that white was facing at <37 ...?> and explains everything!

Mar-05-18  SpamIAm: <goodevans>, they must have FedExed all of their last five moves. ;)
Mar-05-18  morfishine: First <37...Qe4+> forces the White King into the corner, then <38...Qe1+> forces mate

*****

Mar-05-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  malt: Starting with 37...Qe4+ 38.Ka1 Qe1+ 39.N:e1 R:e1#

<Check'm & Wreck'm>

37.gh7+ would be better for White

Mar-05-18  zb2cr: Mate in three, forced. 37. ... Qe4+; 38. Ka1, Qe1+; 39. Nxe1, Rxe1#.
Mar-05-18  sorokahdeen: Ditto on the previous comments re: "Correspondence? Really?"

Let me add: "That wasn't blitz? Are you sure?!"

Mar-05-18  mqhelisi: Zwischenzug pure breed!
Mar-05-18  zborris8: Vides videsit echo man vintsvides man tridusit. Vimus curmudgle videsvints Vides vintsmarquisyogis vides vimus flips videsit dudes hatusit, it swinus Vides vides flavs vimusvasts vides dudes. Tridus dudesit bulks flak fulco mack vintsvimus vides vimus Tridusvimushiats. Vimus bulks vintsvimus, winter c4?? Marquis try dushat is what ushat hints bang!! Vints tridus vints!! Sucksuk mac schlongschlong. Gobusit's vides, vintsvides videsmarquis' vintsbangs. Flags vimus flipsvasts Vides bulks hints vintsit'svasts vimus knight's videsits. Vides vile vimus fife curvy it hint shiat: Qe4+ sew dirty harrys hints vimusit's vides hatusits.
Mar-05-18  zborris8: Oops. Wrong account. j/k!
Mar-05-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  Stonehenge: The year 1987 is probably wrong. White may be L H Deelman and Black Dirk Bleijkmans or A Bleijkmans.
Mar-05-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: <lost in space: Most complicated was to find out that it is black to move.> Exactly the same thing happened to me...
Mar-05-18  Arn Zufeld: I love Mondayís too. Thatís probably the reason I only achieved a Grandpatzer rating...
Mar-05-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  Breunor: When we evaluate the moves after 34, I'm almost positive Perfidious is correct and white played 34 Qh3 and not Qh4.

Even a 900 player would see either Nx h4 or Qxf5ch. Some of the subsequent moves then, although not best, aren't crazy. Note that 37 gxh7ch is still lost (Stockfish shows -6.6) but it is better than mate in 3.

Mar-05-18  landshark: Could today's puzzle be the first Monday ever that's both very easy AND insane?
Mar-05-18  King.Arthur.Brazil: Monday puzzle always make me begin the week laughing. Today is so easy that, I have to see why did white have being check mated, while he is so near to black king neck. So I see other friends talking the same: how can one fall on a 3 moves check-mate, with a move Txh7 in a postal chess game? I guess that he just MAKE any fool move, thinking "I already winned". Everyday, I feel that when I was a young chess player, I could have won some master title, as my chess is stronger than most of the these chess players I see on every monday puzzle here.
Mar-06-18  patzer2: Yesterday's Monday puzzle solution was a back rank mate-in-three starting with 37...Qe4+! -+.

The decisive mistake was 37. Rxh7?? allowing 37...Qe4+! Instead, 37. gxh7+! +- (+8.17 @ 31 ply, Stockfish 9) is a crushing win for White/

Feb-17-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  Stonehenge: Changed the players, the year and the score.

The game can be found in <Schaakschakeringen, May 1987>, although they made the same mistake with 34. Qh4??.

search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CORRESPONDENCE. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Dutch Def: 5.BxNf6 BxBf6 6.e4 (A80) 0-1 Stockfish; 37...?
from Vere's Attic had a stuffed Fredthebear by fredthebear
Dutch Def: 5.BxNf6 BxBf6 6.e4 (A80) 0-1 Stockfish; 37...?
from Hachee is a traditional Dutch stew. by fredthebear
37...? (Monday, March 5)
from Puzzle of the Day 2018 by Phony Benoni
37...Qe4+! solves Monday Mar 5, 2018
from Mate (Mate-in-Three) by patzer2
85_#OTB_How to get away with Checkmate 2
by trh6upsz
85_#OTB_How to get away with Checkmate 2
by whiteshark
37...? (March 5, 2018)
from Monday Puzzles, 2018-2021 by Phony Benoni
Queen Sacrifice in continuation brings checkmate with next move
from Back Rank Mate Examples by trh6upsz
Despeje casilla de escape
from Manejo de piezas -Superioridad en despliegue de by Ediciones3jaques
610_Back rank mating tactics
by whiteshark
37...? (Monday, March 5)
from POTD Dutch by takchess
Queen Sacrifice in continuation brings checkmate with next move
from Back Rank Mate Examples by ChessCoachClark

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC