chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Alfred Schroeder vs Oscar Chajes
Rice Memorial (1916), New York, NY USA, rd 13, Feb-03
Italian Game: Italian Variation (C50)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 1 more A Schroeder/O Chajes game
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Help with kibitzing features can be found on our Kibtizing Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jan-26-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: I can't believe this game has no kibitzing. You see, it had a enormous effect on chess history.

The Rice Memorial tournament (New York, 1916) was played in two stages. A fourteen-player round robin was to qualify four players for a final section to decide the four top prizes, with a fifth prize going to the top non-qualifier. As a result of this last round loss, Chajes finished fifth in the preliminary, one-half point short of qualifying for the final.

However, as reported in the <Brooklyn Daily Eagle> of Sunday, February 6, 1916:

<"Five players, instead of four, will compete in the final state of the Rice Memorial chess masters tournament as the result of action taken at a meeting of the players and managers, with W. M. de Visser, the referee, in the chair, held at the rooms of the Manhattan Chess Club yesterday afternoon. Jose R. Capablanca, with 12 points; D. Janowski, B. Kostic and A. Kupchik, each with 8 1/2, had qualified for the finals, but Oscar Chajes, the fifth prize winner, was added to the list as a result of the action. Chajes, it appears, after having a draw offered to him in his last game with Schroeder in the thirteenth round, played on in an effort to win, under the impression that only by so doing would he be considered for the finals. In this he was mistaken, but the players yesterday all agreed to let him in with eight points and to play the extra rounds necessary to give him a chance for the higher prizes.">

So naturally Chajes won a game from Capablanca in the Final. That's gratitude for you. After that loss, Capablanca began his eight-year unbeaten streak over a total of 63 games. Had Chajes not been admitted to the final, the streak would have stretched for 10 years (1914-1924) and 93 games.

Yes, indeed, a very important game! And now it has some kibitzing.

Dec-05-21  Messiah: <Phony Benoni: I can't believe this game has no kibitzing. You see, it had a enormous effect on chess history.

The Rice Memorial tournament (New York, 1916) was played in two stages. A fourteen-player round robin was to qualify four players for a final section to decide the four top prizes, with a fifth prize going to the top non-qualifier. As a result of this last round loss, Chajes finished fifth in the preliminary, one-half point short of qualifying for the final.

However, as reported in the <Brooklyn Daily Eagle> of Sunday, February 6, 1916:

<"Five players, instead of four, will compete in the final state of the Rice Memorial chess masters tournament as the result of action taken at a meeting of the players and managers, with W. M. de Visser, the referee, in the chair, held at the rooms of the Manhattan Chess Club yesterday afternoon. Jose R. Capablanca, with 12 points; D. Janowski, B. Kostic and A. Kupchik, each with 8 1/2, had qualified for the finals, but Oscar Chajes, the fifth prize winner, was added to the list as a result of the action. Chajes, it appears, after having a draw offered to him in his last game with Schroeder in the thirteenth round, played on in an effort to win, under the impression that only by so doing would he be considered for the finals. In this he was mistaken, but the players yesterday all agreed to let him in with eight points and to play the extra rounds necessary to give him a chance for the higher prizes.">

So naturally Chajes won a game from Capablanca in the Final. That's gratitude for you. After that loss, Capablanca began his eight-year unbeaten streak over a total of 63 games. Had Chajes not been admitted to the final, the streak would have stretched for 10 years (1914-1924) and 93 games.

Yes, indeed, a very important game! And now it has some kibitzing.>

Interesting!

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC