chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Lewis Phillips vs John M McRae
NSW v VIC Telegraph Match (1870), Australia, Nov-09
French Defense: Winawer. Delayed Exchange Variation (C01)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 6 more games of J McRae
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Sep-06-13  optimal play: <<<INTERCOLONIAL CHESS MATCH.

The match by telegraph between seven players of New South Wales and seven players of Victoria, which has formed the leading topic of conversation in the Melbourne chess circles for some time past, took place yesterday, and resulted in a victory for Victoria.

The Victorian players met at the Telegraph office, Market-square, where seven boards had been provided, at 10 o'clock in the morning, and lots having been drawn, the combatants were paired as follows :

No, 1, Hollander (NSW) v. Goldsmith (Vic) ;
No. 2, Phillips (Vic) v. M'Rae (NSW) ;
No. 3, Heydon (NSW) v. Burns (Vic) ;
No. 4, Baynes (Vic) v. Smith (NSW) ;
No. 5, Ryan (NSW) v. Sedgefield (Vic) ;
No. 6, Stanley (Vic) v. Russell (NSW) ;
No. 7, Fisher (Vic) v. Pendrill (NSW).

The representatives of New South Wales had the first move on boards 1, 3, and 5 ; and those of Victoria on boards 2, 4, 6, and 7.

Play commenced at 11 o'clock, and the telegrams were despatched with admirable speed and precision.

At about 10 o'clock [p.m.] Mr. M'Rae, the representative of New South Wales at board 2, succumbed to Mr. L. S. Phillips.

- The Argus (Melbourne, Vic.) issue Thursday 10 November 1870>

NOTES.

(a) 3.♘c3

A move lately brought into vogue by Herr Paulsen.

(b) 5...♕xd5

He would have done better by taking P with P. If he intended to take with Q his previous move was an error.

(c) 6...c5

To this move, Mr. M'Rae attributes the loss of the game.

(d) 9.♗d3

White, no doubt, saw that he might have gained a pawn here, but preferred playing as in the text.

(e) 9...♘a6

Kt to Q 2, followed by B to Q Kt 2, would have been better.

(f) 11...♗b7

Threatening Kt to Kt 5.

(g) 14...O-O

Very dangerous under the circumstances.

(h) 18...♕c7

It was impossible to avoid the loss of a pawn here.

(i) 30.a6

Elegantly played, for if Black takes the rook, White checks at K 8, then takes the R ch, and afterwards the Q, winning easily.

(j) 30...♕e4

P to K 4 looks better. Blacks plays for a perpetual check, but without avail.

(k) 31.a7

White conducts his game throughout with great accuracy and brilliancy.

(l) 34.♔g1

Had he moved R to B 2, Black would have drawn by perpetual check.

The game is very creditable to Mr. M'Rae, whose opponent is evidently one of the most brilliant and beautiful players in the Victorian team.

- Australian Town and Country Journal (NSW) issue Saturday 19 November 1870>

The result of the match was that Victoria scored games 1, 2 and 3 ; New South Wales scored game No. 4. Games Nos. 5 and 6 were drawn, and No. 7 terminated in a dispute, which it has been agreed to refer to Judge Francis.

- Australian Town and Country Journal (NSW) issue Saturday 12 November 1870>

Jan-01-21  schnarre: Yet another game that shows the hazards of deploying the Queen too early.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC